Impact of living donor liver transplantation on long-term cardiometabolic and graft outcomes in cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

被引:0
作者
Karnam, Ravikiran S. [1 ,2 ]
Azhie, Amirhossein [1 ]
Yang, Cathy [1 ]
Rogalsky, Andrew [1 ]
Chen, Shiyi [3 ,4 ]
Xu, Wei [3 ,4 ]
Patel, Keyur [1 ,5 ]
Selzner, Nazia [1 ,5 ]
Lilly, Leslie [1 ,5 ]
Cattral, Mark [1 ,6 ]
Bhat, Mamatha [1 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Ajmera Transplant Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Narayana Hlth, Bengaluru, India
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Multiorgan Transplant Program, 585 Univ Ave,11PMB 183, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
deceased donor liver transplantation; liver transplantation; living donor liver; metabolic complications; NASH; transplantation; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.15008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aimNon-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to determine whether living donor LT (LDLT) recipients experienced less recurrent NASH, cirrhosis, and cardiometabolic complications compared to deceased donor LT (DDLT). MethodPatients with LDLT and DDLT for NASH between February 2002 and May 2018 at University Health Network (UHN) were compared. Cox Proportional Hazard model was used to analyze overall survival (OS), Fine and Gray's Competing Risk models were conducted to analyze cumulative incidence of post LT outcomes. ResultsOne hundred and ninety-nine DDLTs and 66 LDLTs were performed for NASH cirrhosis. Time and rate of recurrence of NAFLD and NASH were comparable in both groups. Graft cirrhosis was more common in DDLT recipients (n = 14) versus LDLT (n = 0) (p < .0001). Significant fibrosis (Fibrosis >= F2) developed in 50 recipients (12 LDLT and 38 DDLT) post LT (DDLT vs. LDLT: HR = 1.00, 95% CI = (.52-1.93), p = .91) and there was no difference in time to significant fibrosis (p = .57). There was no difference in development of post-transplant diabetes, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and cancers. LDLT group had better renal function at 10 years (MDRD eGFR of 57.0 mL/min vs. 48.5 mL/min, p = .047). Both groups had a comparable OS (HR = 1.83 (95% CI = .92-3.62), p = .08). ConclusionOverall, LDLT recipients had significantly better renal function by virtue of having early transplantation in their disease course. LDLT was also associated with significantly less graft cirrhosis, although OS and cardiometabolic outcomes were comparable between LDLT and DDLT.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation
    Barbetta, Arianna
    Aljehani, Mayada
    Kim, Michelle
    Tien, Christine
    Ahearn, Aaron
    Schilperoort, Hannah
    Sher, Linda
    Emamaullee, Juliet
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 (07) : 2399 - 2412
  • [2] Liver Transplant Recipient Survival Benefit with Living Donation in the Model for Endstage Liver Disease Allocation Era
    Berg, Carl L.
    Merion, Robert M.
    Shearon, Tempie H.
    Olthoff, Kim M.
    Brown, Robert S., Jr.
    Baker, Talia B.
    Everson, Gregory T.
    Hong, Johnny C.
    Terrault, Norah
    Hayashi, Paul H.
    Fisher, Robert A.
    Everhart, James E.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 54 (04) : 1313 - 1321
  • [3] Frequency and Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in the United States
    Charlton, Michael R.
    Burns, Justin M.
    Pedersen, Rachel A.
    Watt, Kymberly D.
    Heimbach, Julie K.
    Dierkhising, Ross A.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 141 (04) : 1249 - 1253
  • [4] Age and liver transplantation
    Durand, Francois
    Levitsky, Josh
    Cauchy, Francois
    Gilgenkrantz, Helene
    Soubrane, Olivier
    Francoz, Claire
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 70 (04) : 745 - 758
  • [5] NAFLD and Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease Will Be Responsible for Almost All New Diagnoses of Cirrhosis in Canada by 2040
    Flemming, Jennifer A.
    Djerboua, Maya
    Groome, Patti A.
    Booth, Christopher M.
    Terrault, Norah A.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 (06) : 3330 - 3344
  • [6] Adult Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant (LDLT Versus DDLT) at a Single Center Time to Change Our Paradigm for Liver Transplant
    Humar, Abhinav
    Ganesh, Swaytha
    Jorgensen, Dana
    Tevar, Amit
    Ganoza, Armando
    Molinari, Michele
    Hughes, Christopher
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (03) : 444 - 451
  • [7] Can Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States Reach Its Potential?
    Kaplan, Alyson
    Rosenblatt, Russell
    Samstein, Benjamin
    Brown, Robert S., Jr.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 27 (11) : 1644 - 1652
  • [8] Living Donation Versus Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation for Low Model for End Stage Liver Disease Recipients
    Kling, Catherine E.
    Perkins, James D.
    Reyes, Jorge D.
    Montenovo, Martin I.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 25 (04) : 580 - 587
  • [9] Risk Factors for New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients, an Analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Database
    Kuo, Hung-Tien
    Sampaio, Marcelo Santos
    Ye, Xiaoyi
    Reddy, Pavani
    Martin, Paul
    Bunnapradist, Suphamai
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 89 (09) : 1134 - 1140
  • [10] OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Liver
    Kwong, A.
    Kim, W. R.
    Lake, J. R.
    Smith, J. M.
    Schladt, D. P.
    Skeans, M. A.
    Noreen, S. M.
    Foutz, J.
    Miller, E.
    Snyder, J. J.
    Israni, A. K.
    Kasiske, B. L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 208 - 315