Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces an elevation of tumour apparent diffusion coefficient values in patients with ovarian cancer

被引:2
作者
Reijonen, Milja [1 ,2 ]
Holopainen, Erikka [3 ,4 ]
Arponen, Otso [1 ,2 ]
Kononen, Mervi [3 ,5 ]
Vanninen, Ritva [3 ,4 ]
Anttila, Maarit [6 ,7 ]
Sallinen, Hanna [6 ]
Rinta-Kiikka, Irina [1 ,2 ]
Lindgren, Auni [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tampere, Finland
[2] Univ Tampere, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere, Finland
[3] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Inst Clin Med, Sch Med, Clin Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[5] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Kuopio, Finland
[6] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Kuopio, Finland
[7] Univ Eastern Finland, Inst Clin Med, Sch Med Obstet & Gynaecol, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Apparent diffusion coefficient; ADC values; Region of interest; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY; MRI; RECOMMENDATIONS; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-023-10760-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) is the modality of choice in the imaging of ovarian cancer (OC). We aimed to investigate the feasibility of different types of regions of interest (ROIs) in the measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion-weighted imaging in OC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 23 consecutive patients with advanced OC who had undergone NACT and mMRI. Seventeen of them had been imaged before and after NACT. Two observers independently measured the ADC values in both ovaries and in the metastatic mass by drawing on a single slice of (1) freehand large ROIs (L-ROIs) covering the solid parts of the whole tumour and (2) three small round ROIs (S-ROIs). The side of the primary ovarian tumour was defined. We evaluated the interobserver reproducibility and statistical significance of the change in tumoural pre- and post-NACT ADC values. Each patient's disease was defined as platinum-sensitive, semi-sensitive, or resistant. The patients were deemed either responders or non-responders.ResultsThe interobserver reproducibility of the L-ROI and S-ROI measurements ranged from good to excellent (ICC range: 0.71-0.99). The mean ADC values were significantly higher after NACT in the primary tumour (L-ROI p < 0.001, S-ROIs p < 0.01), and the increase after NACT was associated with sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. The changes in the ADC values of the omental mass were associated with a response to NACT.ConclusionThe mean ADC values of the primary tumour increased significantly after NACT in the OC patients, and the amount of increase in omental mass was associated with the response to platinum-based NACT. Our study indicates that quantitative analysis of ADC values with a single slice and a whole tumour ROI placement is a reproducible method that has a potential role in the evaluation of NACT response in patients with OC.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Value of diffusion-weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Elsa Iannicelli
    Marco Di Pietropaolo
    Emanuela Pilozzi
    Mattia Falchetto Osti
    Maria Valentino
    Luigi Masoni
    Mario Ferri
    Abdominal Radiology, 2016, 41 : 1906 - 1917
  • [42] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Prostate Cancer Imaging: Impact of b Values
    Peng, Yahui
    Jiang, Yulei
    Antic, Tatjana
    Sethi, Ila
    Schmid-Tannwald, Christine
    Eggener, Scott
    Oto, Aytekin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (03) : W247 - W253
  • [43] Investigated regional apparent diffusion coefficient values of the morphologically normal feline brain
    Lindt, Blanca
    Richter, Henning
    Del Chicca, Francesca
    JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 24 (08) : E214 - E222
  • [44] Evaluation of the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient
    Ju, Fa-Jun
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 7555 - 7561
  • [45] Apparent diffusion coefficient values and non-homogeneity of diffusion in brain tumors in diffusion-weighted MRI
    Basirjafari, Sedigheh
    Poureisa, Masoud
    Shahhoseini, Babak
    Zarei, Mohammad
    Neshin, Saeideh Aghayari Sheikh
    Aria, Sheida Anvari
    Nouri-Vaskeh, Masoud
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [46] Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values and peritumoral edema with pathologic biomarkers in patients with breast cancer
    Moradi, Behnaz
    Gity, Masoumeh
    Etesam, Fateme
    Borhani, Ali
    Ahmadinejad, Nasrin
    Kazemi, Mohammad Ali
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2020, 68 : 242 - 248
  • [47] Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI and clinicopathologic features in pancreatic cancer patients
    Hayano, Koichi
    Miura, Fumihiko
    Amano, Hodaka
    Toyota, Naoyuki
    Wada, Keita
    Kato, Kenichiro
    Sano, Keiji
    Takeshita, Koji
    Aoyagi, Tomoyoshi
    Shuto, Kiyohiko
    Matsubara, Hisahiro
    Asano, Takehide
    Takada, Tadahiro
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (02) : 243 - 248
  • [48] Normalized Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Prognostication of Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme
    Shankar, Jai Jai Shiva
    Bata, Adil
    Ritchie, Krista
    Hebb, Andrea
    Walling, Simon
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 43 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [49] Predicting liver metastasis of gastrointestinal tract cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging of apparent diffusion coefficient values
    Zheng, De-Xian
    Meng, Shu-Chun
    Liu, Qing-Jun
    Li, Chuan-Ting
    Shang, Xi-Dan
    Zhu, Yu-Seng
    Bai, Tian-Jun
    Xu, Shi-Ming
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (10) : 3031 - 3037
  • [50] Apparent diffusion coefficient values of the normal uterus: Interindividual variations during menstrual cycle
    Tsili, A. C.
    Argyropoulou, M. I.
    Tzarouchi, L.
    Dalkalitsis, N.
    Koliopoulos, G.
    Paraskevaidis, E.
    Tsampoulas, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (08) : 1951 - 1956