Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces an elevation of tumour apparent diffusion coefficient values in patients with ovarian cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Reijonen, Milja [1 ,2 ]
Holopainen, Erikka [3 ,4 ]
Arponen, Otso [1 ,2 ]
Kononen, Mervi [3 ,5 ]
Vanninen, Ritva [3 ,4 ]
Anttila, Maarit [6 ,7 ]
Sallinen, Hanna [6 ]
Rinta-Kiikka, Irina [1 ,2 ]
Lindgren, Auni [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tampere, Finland
[2] Univ Tampere, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere, Finland
[3] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Inst Clin Med, Sch Med, Clin Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[5] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Kuopio, Finland
[6] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Kuopio, Finland
[7] Univ Eastern Finland, Inst Clin Med, Sch Med Obstet & Gynaecol, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Apparent diffusion coefficient; ADC values; Region of interest; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY; MRI; RECOMMENDATIONS; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-023-10760-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) is the modality of choice in the imaging of ovarian cancer (OC). We aimed to investigate the feasibility of different types of regions of interest (ROIs) in the measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion-weighted imaging in OC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 23 consecutive patients with advanced OC who had undergone NACT and mMRI. Seventeen of them had been imaged before and after NACT. Two observers independently measured the ADC values in both ovaries and in the metastatic mass by drawing on a single slice of (1) freehand large ROIs (L-ROIs) covering the solid parts of the whole tumour and (2) three small round ROIs (S-ROIs). The side of the primary ovarian tumour was defined. We evaluated the interobserver reproducibility and statistical significance of the change in tumoural pre- and post-NACT ADC values. Each patient's disease was defined as platinum-sensitive, semi-sensitive, or resistant. The patients were deemed either responders or non-responders.ResultsThe interobserver reproducibility of the L-ROI and S-ROI measurements ranged from good to excellent (ICC range: 0.71-0.99). The mean ADC values were significantly higher after NACT in the primary tumour (L-ROI p < 0.001, S-ROIs p < 0.01), and the increase after NACT was associated with sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. The changes in the ADC values of the omental mass were associated with a response to NACT.ConclusionThe mean ADC values of the primary tumour increased significantly after NACT in the OC patients, and the amount of increase in omental mass was associated with the response to platinum-based NACT. Our study indicates that quantitative analysis of ADC values with a single slice and a whole tumour ROI placement is a reproducible method that has a potential role in the evaluation of NACT response in patients with OC.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diffusion-weighted MRI of epithelial ovarian cancers: Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values with histologic grade and surgical stage
    Oh, Ji-Won
    Rha, Sung Eun
    Oh, Soon Nam
    Park, Michael Yong
    Byun, Jae Young
    Lee, Ahwon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 590 - 595
  • [22] Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Kim, Yun Ju
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Lee, Ah Won
    Jin, Min-Sun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Song, Byung Joo
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 34 (10) : 657 - 666
  • [23] Apparent diffusion coefficient values predict response to brachytherapy in bulky cervical cancer
    Dong, Elizabeth E.
    Xu, Junqian
    Kim, Joo-Won
    Bryan, Jason
    Appleton, Jewel
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    Ludwig, Michelle S.
    Hanania, Alexander N.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [24] Apparent diffusion coefficient values predict response to brachytherapy in bulky cervical cancer
    Elizabeth E. Dong
    Junqian Xu
    Joo-Won Kim
    Jason Bryan
    Jewel Appleton
    Daniel A. Hamstra
    Michelle S. Ludwig
    Alexander N. Hanania
    Radiation Oncology, 19
  • [25] Apparent diffusion coefficient modifications in assessing gastro-oesophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment: comparison with tumour regression grade at histology
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    Giganti, Francesco
    Orsenigo, Elena
    Cellina, Michaela
    Esposito, Antonio
    Agostini, Giulia
    Albarello, Luca
    Mazza, Elena
    Ambrosi, Alessandro
    Socci, Carlo
    Staudacher, Carlo
    Del Maschio, Alessandro
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (08) : 2165 - 2174
  • [26] Association between the apparent diffusion coefficient and the preoperative chemotherapy response of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer
    Zhu, Bin
    Zhou, Guoping
    Wang, Shiwei
    Wang, Lan
    Wang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [27] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Measured by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Predict Chemoradiotherapeutic Effect for Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Aoyagi, Tomoyoshi
    Shuto, Kiyohiko
    Okazumi, Shinichi
    Shimada, Hideaki
    Kazama, Toshiki
    Matsubara, Hisahiro
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 28 (04) : 252 - 257
  • [28] The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer
    Kuang, Fei
    Ren, Jing
    Zhong, Qun
    Fu Liyuan
    Huan, Yi
    Chen, Ziqian
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (04) : 1050 - 1058
  • [29] The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer
    Fei Kuang
    Jing Ren
    Qun Zhong
    Fu Liyuan
    Yi Huan
    Ziqian Chen
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 1050 - 1058
  • [30] Changes in prostate apparent diffusion coefficient values during radiotherapy after neoadjuvant hormones
    McPartlin, Andrew
    Kershaw, Lucy
    McWilliam, Alan
    Ben Taylor, Marcus
    Hodgson, Clare
    van Herk, Marcel
    Choudhury, Ananya
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2018, 10 (12) : 359 - 364