Superior survival for breast-conserving therapy over mastectomy in patients with breast cancer: A population-based SEER database analysis across 30 years

被引:2
作者
Ke, Shanbao [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Li, Baiyu [1 ]
Feng, Xiao [1 ]
Yan, Danfang [2 ]
Liu, Jianbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ Peoples Hosp, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Oncol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 12卷
关键词
breast cancer; recurrence; cancer-specific survival; competing risk; propensity score weighting; SEER; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; COMPETING RISKS; STAGE-I; KAPLAN-MEIER; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE; RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; EORTC; 10801; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.1032063
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IntroductionIt has been believed that breast-conserving therapy (lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation, Lum + RT) and mastectomy without radiation (Mast + NoRT) have equivalent survival outcomes. However, there is a need to re-evaluate the role of lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation due to changed breast cancer management over time. This study aimed to conduct a population-based study that compare long-term oncologic survival outcomes after Lum + RT vs Mast + NoRT. MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify female breast cancer patients with a primary localized breast cancer diagnosis from 1988 to 2018. The standardized incidence/mortality ratio (SIR/SMR) for breast cancer recurrence (BCR) and breast cancer-specific death (BSD) was estimated by the SEER*Stat program. Cumulative incidences of BCR and BSD were assessed using Gray's method. We evaluated the effects of Lum + RT vs. Mast + NoRT on breast cancer recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Fine-Gray competing risk model analyses, propensity score-adjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards model analyses were applied. ResultsA total of 205,788 women were included in the study. Patients who underwent Lum + RT had higher SIR of BCR (4.14 [95% confidence interval, CI: 3.94-4.34] vs. 1.11 [95% CI: 1.07-1.14]) and lower SMR (9.89 [95% CI: 9.71-10.08] vs. 17.07 [95% CI: 16.82-17.33]) than patients who underwent Mast + NoRT. Lum + RT was associated with higher competing risk of BCR (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.996, 95% CI: 1.925-2.069, p < 0.001) and lower competing risk of BSD when compared to Mast + RT (adjusted HR: 0.584, 95% CI: 0.572-0.597, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed similar results (adjusted HR after PSW for BRFS: 1.792, 95% CI 1.716-1.871, p < 0.001; adjusted HR after PSW for BCSS: 0.706, 95% CI 0.688-0.725, p < 0.001). These findings persisted in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses. DiscussionThe present study further confirmed superior long-term survival with lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation over mastectomy independent of patient characteristics including age, race, time period, historic subtype, tumor size, historic grade and stage, indicating that this benefit may result from the treatment itself.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Mastectomy in Young Breast Cancer Patients Concerning Molecular Subtypes: A SEER Population-Based Study
    Yu, Ping
    Tang, Hailin
    Zou, Yutian
    Liu, Peng
    Tian, Wenwen
    Zhang, Kaiming
    Xie, Xiaoming
    Ye, Feng
    CANCER CONTROL, 2020, 27 (01)
  • [2] Comparison of recurrence and survival rates after breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy in young women with breast cancer
    Cao, J. Q.
    Olson, R. A.
    Tyldesley, S. K.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (06) : E593 - E601
  • [3] Survival Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Therapy Compared With Mastectomy for Patients With Early-Stage Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast: A SEER Population-Based Study
    Wang, Song
    Zhang, Yiyuan
    Yin, Fangxu
    Wang, Xiaohong
    Yang, Zhenlin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [4] Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study
    Volker Arndt
    Christa Stegmaier
    Hartwig Ziegler
    Hermann Brenner
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2008, 134 : 1311 - 1318
  • [5] Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study
    Arndt, Volker
    Stegmaier, Christa
    Ziegler, Hartwig
    Brenner, Hermann
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 134 (12) : 1311 - 1318
  • [6] T1-2N0M0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Breast-Conserving Therapy Has Better Survival Compared to Mastectomy: A SEER Population-Based Retrospective Analysis
    Li, Huan
    Chen, Yajuan
    Wang, Xin
    Tang, Lin
    Guan, Xiaoxiang
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2019, 19 (06) : E669 - E682
  • [7] Breast-conserving therapy shows better prognosis in mucinous breast carcinoma compared with mastectomy: A SEER population-based study
    Yu, Ping
    Liu, Peng
    Zou, Yutian
    Xie, Xinhua
    Tang, Hailin
    Li, Na
    Xie, Xiaoming
    Ye, Feng
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (15): : 5381 - 5391
  • [8] The different outcomes between breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in triple-negative breast cancer: a population-based study from the SEER 18 database
    Chen, Qing-Xia
    Wang, Xiao-Xiao
    Lin, Pei-Yang
    Zhang, Jie
    Li, Jun-Jing
    Song, Chuan-Gui
    Shao, Zhi-Ming
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (03) : 4773 - 4780
  • [9] Survival Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Therapy versus Mastectomy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer, Including Centrally Located Breast Cancer: A SEER-Based Study
    Yu, Tianshui
    Cheng, Weilun
    Wang, Ting
    Chen, Ziang
    Ding, Yu
    Feng, Jianyuan
    Duan, Yunqiang
    Hu, Anbang
    Li, Mingcui
    Zhang, Hanyu
    Li, Yanling
    Ma, Fei
    Guo, Baoliang
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2022, 2022
  • [10] Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for older women with triple-negative breast cancer: population-based study
    Mburu, Waruiru
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    Hodges, James S.
    Virnig, Beth A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (13) : 953 - 967