Biomechanical evaluation of a new intramedullary nail compared with proximal femoral nail antirotation and InterTAN for the management of femoral intertrochanteric fractures

被引:2
作者
Wang, Chaofeng [1 ]
Duan, Ning [1 ]
Li, Zhong [1 ]
Ma, Teng [1 ]
Zhang, Kun [1 ]
Wang, Qian [1 ]
Huang, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Pathol, Hong Hui Hosp, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
mechanical; femur; intertrochanteric fracture; stability; finite element method; implant; SINGLE LAG SCREW; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; FIXATION; BLADE; PFN;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1353677
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical treatment is the main treatment method for femoral intertrochanteric fractures (FIFs), however, there are lots of implant-related complications after surgery. Our team designed a new intramedullary nail (NIN) to manage such fractures. The purpose of this study was to introduce this new implant and compare it with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN for treating FIFs. Methods: An AO/OTA 31-A1.3 FIF model was built and three fixation models were created via finite element method, comprising PFNA, InterTAN, and the NIN. Vertical, anteroposterior (A-P) bending, and torsional loads were simulated and applied to the three fixation models. Displacement and stress distribution were monitored. In order to compare PFNA and the NIN deeply, finite element testing was repeated for five times in vertical load case. Results: The finite element analysis (FEA) data indicated that the NIN possessed the most outstanding mechanical properties among the three fixation models. The NIN model had lower maximal stress at implants compared to PFNA and InterTAN models under three load conditions. The trend of maximal stress at bones was similar to that of maximal stress at implants. Besides, the NIN model showed smaller maximal displacement compared with PFNA and InterTAN models under vertical, A-P bending, and torsional load cases. The trend for maximal displacement of fracture surface (MDFS) was almost identical with that of maximal displacement. In addition, there was significant difference between the PFNA and NIN groups in vertical load case (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with PFNA and InterTAN, the NIN displayed the best mechanical properties for managing FIFs, including the lowest von Mises stress at implants and bones, and the smallest maximal displacement and MDFS under vertical, A-P bending, and torsional load cases. Therefore, this study might provide a new choice for patients with FIFs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures
    Kristek, Dalibor
    Lovric, Ivan
    Kristek, Jozo
    Biljan, Marta
    Kristek, Gordana
    Sakic, Kata
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2010, 34 (03) : 937 - 940
  • [22] Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: A study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
    Tang, Peifu
    Hu, Fangke
    Shen, Jing
    Zhang, Licheng
    Zhang, Lihai
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (06): : 876 - 881
  • [23] Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures
    Sahin, Suner
    Erturer, Erden
    Ozturk, Irfan
    Toker, Serdar
    Seckin, Faik
    Akman, Senol
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2010, 44 (02) : 127 - 134
  • [24] Biomechanical study on the stability and strain conduction of intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus triangular supporting intramedullary nail
    Haicheng Wang
    Weijie Yang
    Kai Ding
    Yanbin Zhu
    Yifan Zhang
    Chuan Ren
    Kuo Zhao
    Qi Zhang
    Wei Chen
    Yingze Zhang
    International Orthopaedics, 2022, 46 : 341 - 350
  • [25] Biomechanical study on the stability and strain conduction of intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus triangular supporting intramedullary nail
    Wang, Haicheng
    Yang, Weijie
    Ding, Kai
    Zhu, Yanbin
    Zhang, Yifan
    Ren, Chuan
    Zhao, Kuo
    Zhang, Qi
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Yingze
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 46 (02) : 341 - 350
  • [26] Procedure for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures using the "Three-Finger Method" Assisted by Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation
    Cheng Qian
    Lin Li
    Zhu Xiao-dong
    Li Gui-zhu
    Gao Xiao-ming
    Qian Yao
    Zhao Guo-yang
    Di Dong-hua
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) : 543 - 551
  • [27] The nail-shaft-axis of the of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) is an important prognostic factor in the operative treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
    Jiamton, Chittawee
    Boernert, Katja
    Babst, Reto
    Beeres, Frank J. P.
    Link, Bjorn-Christian
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2018, 138 (03) : 339 - 349
  • [28] Cemented hemiarthroplasty versus proximal femoral nail antirotation in the management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly: a case control study
    Zhuangzhuang Jin
    Shuoyan Xu
    Yue Yang
    Yingliang Wei
    Yicheng Tian
    Ziyuan Wang
    Lunhao Bai
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [29] Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail
    Min, Woo-Kie
    Kim, Shin-Yoon
    Kim, Tae-Kong
    Lee, Kyu-Bong
    Cho, Myung-Rae
    Ha, Yong-Chan
    Koo, Kyung-Hoi
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 63 (05): : 1054 - 1060
  • [30] Proximal femoral nail antirotation and third-generation Gamma nail: which is a better device for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures?
    Yang, Yue-Hua
    Wang, Yu-Ren
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (08) : 446 - 450