Biomechanical evaluation of a new intramedullary nail compared with proximal femoral nail antirotation and InterTAN for the management of femoral intertrochanteric fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Chaofeng [1 ]
Duan, Ning [1 ]
Li, Zhong [1 ]
Ma, Teng [1 ]
Zhang, Kun [1 ]
Wang, Qian [1 ]
Huang, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Pathol, Hong Hui Hosp, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
mechanical; femur; intertrochanteric fracture; stability; finite element method; implant; SINGLE LAG SCREW; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; FIXATION; BLADE; PFN;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1353677
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical treatment is the main treatment method for femoral intertrochanteric fractures (FIFs), however, there are lots of implant-related complications after surgery. Our team designed a new intramedullary nail (NIN) to manage such fractures. The purpose of this study was to introduce this new implant and compare it with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN for treating FIFs. Methods: An AO/OTA 31-A1.3 FIF model was built and three fixation models were created via finite element method, comprising PFNA, InterTAN, and the NIN. Vertical, anteroposterior (A-P) bending, and torsional loads were simulated and applied to the three fixation models. Displacement and stress distribution were monitored. In order to compare PFNA and the NIN deeply, finite element testing was repeated for five times in vertical load case. Results: The finite element analysis (FEA) data indicated that the NIN possessed the most outstanding mechanical properties among the three fixation models. The NIN model had lower maximal stress at implants compared to PFNA and InterTAN models under three load conditions. The trend of maximal stress at bones was similar to that of maximal stress at implants. Besides, the NIN model showed smaller maximal displacement compared with PFNA and InterTAN models under vertical, A-P bending, and torsional load cases. The trend for maximal displacement of fracture surface (MDFS) was almost identical with that of maximal displacement. In addition, there was significant difference between the PFNA and NIN groups in vertical load case (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with PFNA and InterTAN, the NIN displayed the best mechanical properties for managing FIFs, including the lowest von Mises stress at implants and bones, and the smallest maximal displacement and MDFS under vertical, A-P bending, and torsional load cases. Therefore, this study might provide a new choice for patients with FIFs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Huang, Yanfeng
    Zhang, Chunlin
    Luo, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (12) : 2465 - 2473
  • [2] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Yanfeng Huang
    Chunlin Zhang
    Yi Luo
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 2465 - 2473
  • [3] A comparison of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral fail antirotation in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures
    Imerci, Ahmet
    Aydogan, Nevres H.
    Tosun, Kursad
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2018, 84 (02): : 123 - 131
  • [4] BIOMECHANICAL STUDY ON PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION (PFNA) FOR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE
    Wang, Lizhen
    Zhao, Feng
    Han, Jingyun
    Wang, Chao
    Fan, Yubo
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 12 (04)
  • [5] Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femoral Bionic Nail (PFBN), Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan for Treatment of Reverse Obliquity Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Xiong, Chen
    Zhang, Lijia
    Wang, Yanhua
    Zhang, Xiaomeng
    Chen, Xiaofeng
    Yu, Kai
    Zhang, Yichong
    Fu, Huijuan
    Ding, Zhentao
    Zhang, Dianying
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2025,
  • [6] Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN) Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Wang, Yanhua
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Lijia
    Xiong, Chen
    Zhang, Xiaomeng
    Yu, Kai
    Ju, Jiabao
    Chen, Xiaofeng
    Zhang, Dianying
    Zhang, Yingze
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (09) : 2245 - 2255
  • [7] Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Results with the Proximal Femoral Intramedullary Nail (PROFIN), the Anti-Rotation Proximal Femoral Nail (A-PFN), and the InterTAN Nail
    Yalin, Mustafa
    Golgelioglu, Fatih
    Key, Sefa
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (03):
  • [8] A novel intramedullary nail design of intertrochanteric fracture fixation improved by proximal femoral nail antirotation
    She, Ze
    Yang, Fan
    Zhang, Siyuan
    Yang, Liang
    Wang, Xin
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 28 (02) : 292 - 302
  • [9] Biomechanical outcome of proximal femoral nail antirotation is superior to proximal femoral locking compression plate for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures: a biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures
    Ma, Jian-Xiong
    Wang, Jie
    Xu, Wei-Guo
    Yu, Jing-Tao
    Yang, Yang
    Ma, Xin-Long
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2015, 49 (04) : 426 - 432
  • [10] INTERTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia for intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis
    Zhang, Hui
    Zeng, Xianshang
    Zhang, Nan
    Zeng, Dan
    Xu, Ping
    Zhang, Lili
    Chen, Deng
    Yu, Weiguang
    Zhang, Xinchao
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (04) : 1297 - 1309