Ethical considerations of using system dynamics in participatory settings: a social-ecological-systems perspective

被引:3
作者
Amorocho-Daza, Henry [1 ,2 ]
van der Zaag, Pieter [1 ,2 ]
Susnik, Janez [1 ]
机构
[1] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Land & Water Management Dept, POB 3015, NL-2601 DA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Water Management Dept, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MANAGEMENT; ISSUES; REFLECTIONS; LESSONS; SCRIPTS; EQUITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1002/sdr.1755
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The social-ecological systems (SES) approach elicits a broad understanding of some of the most pressing socionatural challenges (e.g. resource scarcity, biodiversity loss, and climate change) and the responsibility that humans have in addressing them. System dynamics has proven a powerful paradigm for dealing with complex SES-related issues. Here we discuss some ethical considerations of using system dynamics (SD) to model SES, something that is often either overlooked or discussed as an isolated issue. Sustainable development and human rights are used as ethical standpoints across the modelling cycle, opening the discussion around guiding principles that need to be considered when modelling SES. Based on these, a set of guiding ethical questions are identified and classified across a participatory SD modelling cycle. This structured approach is a simple yet potentially useful tool for SD practitioners to examine the ethical implications of their modelling endeavours in the context of grand societal challenges. (c) 2023 The Authors. System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Leverage points for sustainability transformation
    Abson, David J.
    Fischer, Joern
    Leventon, Julia
    Newig, Jens
    Schomerus, Thomas
    Vilsmaier, Ulli
    von Wehrden, Henrik
    Abernethy, Paivi
    Ives, Christopher D.
    Jager, Nicolas W.
    Lang, Daniel J.
    [J]. AMBIO, 2017, 46 (01) : 30 - 39
  • [2] Andersen DF, 1997, SYST DYNAM REV, V13, P107, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<107::AID-SDR120>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-7
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation. 1/ 2013
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, PRED 2021
  • [6] Berti E., 2014, SUSTAINABLE HUMANITY, VExtra Series 41, P661
  • [7] Bourguignon D., 2016, The precautionary principle. Definitions, applications and governance: Indepth analysis
  • [8] Brundtland GH., 1987, Our common future
  • [9] Chadwick RF., 2012, Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, V2nd edn
  • [10] Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Boyd, David R.
    Gould, Rachelle K.
    Jetzkowitz, Jens
    Liu, Jianguo
    Muraca, Barbara
    Naidoo, Robin
    Olmsted, Paige
    Satterfield, Terre
    Selomane, Odirilwe
    Singh, Gerald G.
    Sumaila, Rashid
    Ngo, Hien T.
    Boedhihartono, Agni Klintuni
    Agard, John
    de Aguiar, Ana Paula D.
    Armenteras, Dolors
    Balint, Lenke
    Barrington-Leigh, Christopher
    Cheung, William W. L.
    Diaz, Sandra
    Driscoll, John
    Esler, Karen
    Eyster, Harold
    Gregr, Edward J.
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Pedraza, Gladys Cecilia Hernandez
    Hickler, Thomas
    Kok, Marcel
    Lazarova, Tanya
    Mohamed, Assem A. A.
    Murray-Hudson, Mike
    Farrell, Patrick O.
    Palomo, Ignacio
    Saysel, Ali Kerem
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Settele, Josef
    Strassburg, Bernardo
    Xue, Dayuan
    Brondizio, Eduardo S.
    [J]. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2020, 2 (03) : 693 - 717