An Open-Label Study of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation on Behavioral Regulation in a Mixed Neurodevelopmental Clinical Cohort

被引:1
作者
Brandes-Aitken, Annie [1 ,2 ]
Gerdes, Molly [1 ]
Hattangadi, Neil [1 ]
Shapiro, Kevin A. [1 ,3 ]
Marco, Elysa J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cortica Healthcare Inc, San Diego, CA 92111 USA
[2] New York Univ, Dept Appl Psychol, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Neurol Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
关键词
cranial electrotherapy stimulation; neurodevelopment; sensory sensitivity; anxiety; emotion regulation; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; EMOTION REGULATION; ADAPTIVE-BEHAVIOR; AUTISM; ANXIETY; CHILDREN; EFFICACY; INTERVENTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.31083/j.jin2205119
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: Individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders often report disturbances in the autonomic nervous system (ANS)-related behavioral regulation, such as sensory sensitivity, anxiety, and emotion dysregulation. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a method of non-invasive neuromodulation presumed to modify behavioral regulation abilities via ANS modulation. Here we examined the feasibility and preliminary effects of a 4-week CES intervention on behavioral regulation in a mixed neurodevelopmental cohort of children, adolescents, and young adults. Methods: In this single-arm open-label study, 263 individuals aged 4-24 who were receiving clinical care were recruited. Participants received at-home CES treatment using an Alpha-Stim (R) AID CES device for 20 minutes per day, 5-7 days per week, for four weeks. Before and after the intervention, a parent-report assessment of sensory sensitivities, emotion dysregulation, and anxiety was administered. Adherence, side effects, and tolerance of the CES device were also evaluated at follow-up. Results: Results showed a 75% completion rate, an average tolerance score of 68.2 (out of 100), and an average perceived satisfaction score of 58.8 (out of 100). Additionally, a comparison between pre- and post-CES treatment effects showed a significant reduction in sensory sensitivity, anxiety, and emotion dysregulation in participants following CES treatment. Conclusions: Results provide justification for future randomized control trials using CES in children and adolescents with behavioral dysregulation. Significance: CES may be a useful therapeutic tool for alleviating behavioral dysregulation symptoms in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental differences.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Update on Psychopharmacological Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Aishworiya, Ramkumar
    Valica, Tatiana
    Hagerman, Randi
    Restrepo, Bibiana
    [J]. NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 19 (01) : 248 - 262
  • [2] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Pilot Study
    Bandeira, Igor Dorea
    Quadros Guimaraes, Rachel Silvany
    Jagersbacher, Joao Gabriel
    Barretto, Thiago Lima
    de Jesus-Silva, Jessica Regina
    Santos, Samantha Nunes
    Argollo, Nayara
    Lucena, Rita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2016, 31 (07) : 918 - 924
  • [3] A clinical trial of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for anxiety and comorbid depression
    Barclay, Timothy H.
    Barclay, Raymond D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2014, 164 : 171 - 177
  • [4] THE CENTRAL AUTONOMIC NETWORK - FUNCTIONAL-ORGANIZATION, DYSFUNCTION, AND PERSPECTIVE
    BENARROCH, EE
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1993, 68 (10) : 988 - 1001
  • [5] AUTONOMIC DETERMINISM - THE MODES OF AUTONOMIC CONTROL, THE DOCTRINE OF AUTONOMIC SPACE, AND THE LAWS OF AUTONOMIC CONSTRAINT
    BERNTSON, GG
    CACIOPPO, JT
    QUIGLEY, KS
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (04) : 459 - 487
  • [6] Bracciano A.G., 2012, Journal of Neurotherapy, V16, P60
  • [7] Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) Does Not Reliably Influence Emotional, Physiological, Biochemical, or Behavioral Responses to Acute Stress
    Brunye, Tad T.
    Giles, Grace E.
    Eddy, Marianna D.
    Navarro, Ester
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT, 2022, 6 (03) : 417 - 433
  • [8] A Critical Review of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Neuromodulation in Clinical and Non-clinical Samples
    Brunye, Tad T.
    Patterson, Joseph E.
    Wooten, Thomas
    Hussey, Erika K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [9] A pilot study of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for generalized anxiety disorder
    Bystritsky, Alexander
    Kerwin, Lauren
    Feusner, Jamie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 69 (03) : 412 - 417
  • [10] Cacioppo JT, 2007, HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 3RD EDITION, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521844711