FLASH Radiotherapy and the Use of Radiation Dosimeters

被引:23
|
作者
Siddique, Sarkar [1 ]
Ruda, Harry E. [2 ,3 ]
Chow, James [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Dept Phys, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Appl Sci & Engn, Ctr Adv Nanotechnol, Toronto, ON M5S 3E4, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3E4, Canada
[4] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
FLASH radiotherapy; ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy; detectors; dosimetry; CHAMBER;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15153883
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: FLASH radiotherapy (RT) delivering ultra-high dose rate radiation can reduce normal tissue toxicity while effectively treating tumors. However, implementing FLASH RT in clinical settings faces challenges like limited depth penetration and complex treatment planning. Monte Carlo simulation is a valuable tool to optimize FLASH RT. Radiation detectors, including diamond detectors like microDiamond and ionization chambers, play a crucial role in accurately measuring dose delivery. Moreover, optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters and radiochromic films are used for validation. Advancements are being made to improve detector accuracy in FLASH RT. Further research is needed to refine treatment planning and detector performance for widespread FLASH RT implementation, which can potentially revolutionize cancer treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) using ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation, known as FLASH RT, has shown promising results in reducing normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. However, implementing FLASH RT in clinical settings presents technical challenges, including limited depth penetration and complex treatment planning. Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is a valuable tool for dose calculation in RT and has been investigated for optimizing FLASH RT. Various MC codes, such as EGSnrc, DOSXYZnrc, and Geant4, have been used to simulate dose distributions and optimize treatment plans. Accurate dosimetry is essential for FLASH RT, and radiation detectors play a crucial role in measuring dose delivery. Solid-state detectors, including diamond detectors such as microDiamond, have demonstrated linear responses and good agreement with reference detectors in UHDR and ultra-high dose per pulse (UHDPP) ranges. Ionization chambers are commonly used for dose measurement, and advancements have been made to address their response nonlinearities at UHDPP. Studies have proposed new calculation methods and empirical models for ion recombination in ionization chambers to improve their accuracy in FLASH RT. Additionally, strip-segmented ionization chamber arrays have shown potential for the experimental measurement of dose rate distribution in proton pencil beam scanning. Radiochromic films, such as Gafchromic (TM) EBT3, have been used for absolute dose measurement and to validateMCsimulation results in high-energy X-rays, triggering the FLASH effect. These films have been utilized to characterize ionization chambers and measure off-axis and depth dose distributions in FLASH RT. In conclusion, MC simulation provides accurate dose calculation and optimization for FLASH RT, while radiation detectors, including diamond detectors, ionization chambers, and radiochromic films, offer valuable tools for dosimetry in UHDR environments. Further research is needed to refine treatment planning techniques and improve detector performance to facilitate the widespread implementation of FLASH RT, potentially revolutionizing cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Plastic scintillator-based dosimeters for FLASH radiotherapy
    Ciarrocchi, E.
    Morrocchi, M.
    Del Sarto, D.
    Di Martino, F.
    Linsalata, S.
    Pensavalle, J. H.
    Bisogni, M. G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S779 - S780
  • [2] Radiation measurement in the environment of FLASH using passive dosimeters
    Mukherjee, B.
    Rybka, D.
    Makowski, D.
    Lipka, T.
    Simrock, S.
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 18 (08) : 2387 - 2396
  • [3] Commissioning of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for use in radiotherapy
    Dunn, Leon
    Lye, Jessica
    Kenny, John
    Lehmann, Joerg
    Williams, Ivan
    Kron, Tomas
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2013, 51-52 : 31 - 39
  • [4] Review of four novel dosimeters developed for use in radiotherapy
    Metcalfe, P.
    Quinn, A.
    Loo, K.
    Lerch, M.
    Petasecca, M.
    Wong, J.
    Hardcastle, N.
    Carolan, M.
    McNamara, J.
    Cutajar, D.
    Fuduli, I.
    Espinoza, A.
    Porumb, C.
    Rosenfeld, A.
    7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY (IC3DDOSE), 2013, 444
  • [5] State-of-the-art silicon carbide diode dosimeters for ultra-high dose-per-pulse radiation at FLASH radiotherapy
    Fleta, Celeste
    Pellegrini, Giulio
    Godignon, Philippe
    Gomez Rodriguez, Faustino
    Paz-Martin, Jose
    Kranzer, Rafael
    Schueller, Andreas
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (09):
  • [6] FLASH radiotherapy: an emerging approach in radiation therapy
    Matuszak, Natalia
    Suchorska, Wiktoria Maria
    Milecki, Piotr
    Kruszyna-Mochalska, Marta
    Misiarz, Agnieszka
    Pracz, Jacek
    Malicki, Julian
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2022, 27 (02) : 344 - 351
  • [7] USE OF MINIATURE GLASS ROD DOSIMETERS IN RADIATION ECOLOGY
    KAYE, SV
    ECOLOGY, 1965, 46 (1-2) : 201 - 206
  • [8] The use of pellets of Brazilian natural topaz as radiation dosimeters
    Souza, DN
    Valerio, MEG
    De Lima, JF
    Caldas, LVE
    RADIATION EFFECTS AND DEFECTS IN SOLIDS, 2001, 156 (1-4): : 325 - 330
  • [9] Radiation Induced Acoustic Dosimetry of Electron Flash Radiotherapy
    Bjegovic, K.
    Sun, L.
    Pandey, P. K.
    Gonzalez, G.
    Vozenin, M. C.
    Limoli, C.
    Xiang, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7749 - 7749
  • [10] FLASH Radiotherapy: The Next Technological Advance in Radiation Therapy?
    Symonds, P.
    Jones, G. D. D.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 31 (07) : 405 - 406