Affective Responses to Trust Violations in a Human-Autonomy Teaming Context: Humans Versus Robots

被引:3
作者
Alarcon, Gene M. [1 ]
Lyons, Joseph B. [1 ]
Hamdan, Izz aldin [2 ]
Jessup, Sarah A. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Lab, 2245 Monahan Way, Wright Patterson Afb, OH 45433 USA
[2] Gen Dynam Informat Technol, 5000 Springfield St, Dayton, OH 45431 USA
[3] Consortium Univ, NW Suite 500,1020 19Th St, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Human-robot interaction; Trust; Emotions; Ability; Benevolence; Integrity; HUMAN-AUTOMATION TRUST; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12369-023-01017-w
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Despite the increasing use of robots in a variety of applications, little is known about the emotional responses humans experience when a robot or a human commits a trust violation. The current paper compares the affective responses of humans paired with either a human or a robot confederate who committed trust violations. Additionally, the current paper utilizes new manipulations in the literature to experimentally manipulate the type of trust violation, namely ability, benevolence, and integrity violations. As expected, when a robot committed an ability violation participants' positive affect decreased more than if the violation was performed by a human. When an integrity or benevolence violation occurred, participants had a greater decrease in positive affect when a human performed the violations than when a robot violated trust. Overall, participants experienced more negative affect with a human partner than a robot partner. Also, ability violations had stronger effects on negative affect than integrity violations. Results indicate humans do have different affective responses when trust is violated, depending on the type of violation as well as the partner performing the violation. Implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 35
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The Effects of Trustworthiness Manipulations on Trustworthiness Perceptions and Risk-Taking Behaviors
    Alarcon, Gene M.
    Capiola, August
    Lee, Michael A.
    Jessup, Sarah A.
    [J]. DECISION-WASHINGTON, 2022, 9 (04): : 388 - 406
  • [2] Exploring the differential effects of trust violations in human-human and human-robot interactions
    Alarcon, Gene M.
    Gibson, Anthony M.
    Jessup, Sarah A.
    Capiola, August
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2021, 93
  • [3] The effect of propensity to trust and perceptions of trustworthiness on trust behaviors in dyads
    Alarcon, Gene M.
    Lyons, Joseph B.
    Christensen, James C.
    Klosterman, Samantha L.
    Bowers, Margaret A.
    Ryan, Tyler J.
    Jessup, Sarah A.
    Wynne, Kevin T.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (05) : 1906 - 1920
  • [4] Bates D., 2015, lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8, DOI [DOI 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01]
  • [5] TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY
    BERG, J
    DICKHAUT, J
    MCCABE, K
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) : 122 - 142
  • [6] Linking precursors of interpersonal trust to human-automation trust: An expanded typology and exploratory experiment
    Calhoun, Christopher S.
    Bobko, Philip
    Gallimore, Jennie J.
    Lyons, Joseph B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRUST RESEARCH, 2019, 9 (01) : 28 - 46
  • [7] "Why Did You Hurt Me?" Victim's Interpersonal Betrayal Attribution and Trust Implications
    Chan, MeowLan Evelyn
    [J]. REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 13 (03) : 262 - 274
  • [8] Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience
    Chiou, Erin K.
    Lee, John D.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 65 (01) : 137 - 165
  • [9] Moral and Amoral Conceptions of Trust, with an Application in Organizational Ethics
    Cohen, Marc A.
    Dienhart, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 112 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [10] Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance
    Colquitt, Jason A.
    Scott, Brent A.
    LePine, Jeffery A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (04) : 909 - 927