Environmental and economic impacts of improper materials in the recycling of separated collected food waste through anaerobic digestion and composting

被引:10
|
作者
Le Pera, Adolfo [1 ]
Sellaro, Miriam [1 ]
Sicilia, Francesco [1 ]
Ciccoli, Roberto [2 ]
Sceberras, Beatrice [2 ]
Freda, Cesare [3 ]
Fanelli, Emanuele [3 ]
Cornacchia, Giacinto [3 ]
机构
[1] Calabra Maceri & Servizi SpA, via M Polo 54, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, CS, Italy
[2] ENEA CR Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, I-00123 Rome, Italy
[3] ENEA Trisaia Res Ctr, ss Jonica 106 km 419, I-75026 Rotondella, MT, Italy
关键词
Food waste; Life cycle assessment; Environmental life cycle costing; Compositional analysis; Anaerobic digestion; Composting; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; ORGANIC FRACTION; IMPURITIES; OFMSW; BIOWASTE; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163240
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Separately collected food waste (SC-FW) is effectively recycled through industrial anaerobic digestion (AD) and composting. However, the presence of improper materials in SC-FW not only generates technical problems to AD and composting, but also lowers the quality of the outputs of the processes. As a consequence, improper materials found in SC-FW cause not negligible environmental and economic burdens.In this study, the environmental and economic impacts due to the presence of unsuitable materials in the SC-FW, de-termined through compositional analysis, were estimated through life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing approaches. Three different scenarios were analysed for both AD and composting processes: (i) the current sit-uation (CS); (ii) the improved scenario (AS) with an amount of improper materials in SC-FW reduced to 3 % (w/w); (iii) the ideal scenario (IS) with the total absence of foreign materials.Environmental benefits were determined for the AS and IS scenarios in 17 of the 19 analysed impact categories. Con-sidering the GHG emissions, higher savings were measured for AD in AS and IS scenarios (47 % and 79%, respectively) than in CS scenario. Similarly, savings of -10.4 kg fossil oil eq/tonSC-FW (AS) and - 17.1 kg fossil oil eq/tonSC-FW (IS) for AD could be obtained with respect to the CS scenario. Greater economic benefits were calculated for AD (-76.4 euro/ tonSC-FW) and composting (-52.2 euro/tonSC-FW) in the IS scenario. Savings up to euro 2,249,780 and euro 3,888,760 could have been obtained in 2022 by reducing to 3 % (w/w) and eliminating, respectively, the amount of improper materials in the SC-FW.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental impacts and nutrient distribution routes for food waste separated disposal on large-scale anaerobic digestion/composting plants
    Zhou, Yuxiao
    Hu, Yuzhi
    Chen, A. J. Y.
    Cheng, Zhaowen
    Bi, Zhujie
    Zhang, Ruina
    Lou, Ziyang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 318
  • [2] A technical, economic and environmental comparison of composting and anaerobic digestion of biodegradable municipal waste
    Murphy, JD
    Power, NM
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 41 (05): : 865 - 879
  • [3] Effects of anaerobic digestion of food waste on biogas production and environmental impacts: a review
    Chew, Kah Rong
    Leong, Hui Yi
    Khoo, Kuan Shiong
    Vo, Dai-Viet N.
    Anjum, Hirra
    Chang, Chih-Kai
    Show, Pau Loke
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2021, 19 (04) : 2921 - 2939
  • [4] Environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion of household food waste
    Slorach, Peter C.
    Jeswani, Harish K.
    Cuellar-Franca, Rosa
    Azapagic, Adisa
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 236 : 798 - 814
  • [5] Environmental sustainability of an integrate anaerobic digestion-composting treatment of food waste: Analysis of an Italian plant in the circular bioeconomy strategy
    Le Pera, Adolfo
    Sellaro, Miriam
    Bencivenni, Egidio
    D'Amico, Francesco
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 139 : 341 - 351
  • [6] Effects of anaerobic digestion of food waste on biogas production and environmental impacts: a review
    Kah Rong Chew
    Hui Yi Leong
    Kuan Shiong Khoo
    Dai-Viet N. Vo
    Hirra Anjum
    Chih-Kai Chang
    Pau Loke Show
    Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2021, 19 : 2921 - 2939
  • [7] Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of dry and wet anaerobic digestion for treating food waste and biogas digestate
    Xiao, Huaping
    Zhang, Dongqing
    Tang, Zhihua
    Li, Kai
    Guo, Huafang
    Niu, Xiaojun
    Yi, Linzi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 338
  • [8] Reviewing the anaerobic digestion and co-digestion process of food waste from the perspectives on biogas production performance and environmental impacts
    Chiu, Sam L. H.
    Lo, Irene M. C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (24) : 24435 - 24450
  • [9] Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste-recycling Wastewater
    Han, Gyuseong
    Shin, Seung Gu
    Lim, Juntaek
    Jo, Minho
    Hwang, Seokhwan
    2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AQUA SCIENCE, WATER RESOURCE AND LOW CARBON ENERGY, 2010, 1251 : 209 - 212
  • [10] Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic waste: Environmental impact and economic assessment
    Van Fan, Yee
    Klemes, Jiff Jaromir
    Perry, Simon
    Lee, Chew Tin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 231 : 352 - 363