Optimal straw management co-benefits crop yield and soil carbon sequestration of intensive farming systems

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Enli [3 ]
Qian, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yingbo [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zongxin [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Kaichang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Engn Res Ctr Wheat & Maize, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Acad Agr Sci, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[3] CSIRO Agr & Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
farming system; greenhouse gas emission; soil carbon sequestration; straw return; wheat-maize double cropping system; N2O EMISSIONS; ORGANIC-MATTER; RESIDUE-CARBON; CHINA; DYNAMICS; INPUTS; WHEAT; DECOMPOSITION; IMPACTS; PLAIN;
D O I
10.1002/ldr.4610
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Straw retention has been widely recommended to sequester more soil organic carbon (SOC) in agricultural soils, while carbon sequestration may not respond linearly to additional carbon input amount. The response of SOC, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and economic income to different straw management methods in intensive wheat-maize double cropping systems still need systematical study. An 8-year field experiment was conducted in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain to investigate the impacts of optimal straw management (wheat straw was all crushed and spread on the soil surface, maize straw was all crushed and returned t into 0-15 cm soil layer) and optimal straw management (wheat straw was all crushed and spread on the soil surface, while maize straw was all harvested for feed) on SOC sequestrations, carbon economy and economic income. The results showed that only returning wheat straw into the field could maintain a similar crop yield (15.0 Mg ha(-1)) and SOC sequestration amount (9.06 Mg C ha(-1)) to the conventional straw management method. While this optimal straw management method kept a stable SOC sequestration rate of 1.24 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) when the SOC sequestration rate decreased from 1.76 to 1.20 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) in the conventional method. The optimal management method also further reduced GHG emissions by 85.4% and using maize straw as stock feed increased net income by 28.3%. Only returning wheat straw could realize economic and environmental benefits win-win in the wheat-maize double cropping systems, which provides important background knowledge about safe and sustainable agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:2322 / 2333
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Global warming potential of farming systems across England: possible mitigation and co-benefits for water quality and biodiversity
    Zhang, Yusheng
    Collins, Adrian L.
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 45 (02)
  • [32] Co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippine uplands: implications for forest landscape restoration
    Mukul, Sharif A.
    Herbohn, John
    Firn, Jennifer
    BIOTROPICA, 2016, 48 (06) : 882 - 889
  • [33] Long-term effect of farming systems on the yield of crop rotation and soil nutrient content
    Keres, Indrek
    Alaru, Maarika
    Talgre, Liina
    Eremeev, Viacheslav
    Luik, Anne
    Loit, Evelin
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 29 (03) : 210 - 221
  • [34] Effect of crop rotation and straw application in combination with mineral nitrogen fertilization on soil carbon sequestration in the Thyrow long-term experiment Thy_D5
    Kroschewski, Baerbel
    Richter, Christel
    Baumecker, Michael
    Kautz, Timo
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2023, 488 (1-2) : 121 - 136
  • [35] Role of fertilization regime on soil carbon sequestration and crop yield in a maize-cowpea intercropping system on low fertility soils
    Roohi, Mahnaz
    Arif, Muhammad Saleem
    Guillaume, Thomas
    Yasmeen, Tahira
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Shakoor, Awais
    Farooq, Taimoor Hassan
    Shahzad, Sher Muhammad
    Bragazza, Luca
    GEODERMA, 2022, 428
  • [36] Soil carbon sequestration and associated economic costs for farming systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plain: A meta-analysis
    Grace, Peter R.
    Antle, John
    Aggarwal, P. K.
    Ogle, Stephen
    Paustian, Keith
    Basso, Bruno
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 146 (01) : 137 - 146
  • [37] Carbon footprint of milk from sheep farming systems in Northern Spain including soil carbon sequestration in grasslands
    Batalla, Inmaculada
    Knudsen, Marie Trydeman
    Mogensen, Lisbeth
    del Hierro, Oscar
    Pinto, Miriam
    Hermansen, John E.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 104 : 121 - 129
  • [38] Fourteen-years impact of crop establishment, tillage and residue management on carbon input, soil carbon sequestration, crop productivity and profitability of rice-wheat system
    Fagodiya, Ram K.
    Sharma, Gargi
    Verma, Kamlesh
    Singh, Ajay
    Singh, Ranbir
    Sheoran, Parvender
    Rai, Arvind Kumar
    Prajapat, Kailash
    Kumar, Suresh
    Chandra, Priyanka
    Rani, Sonia
    Sharma, D. P.
    Yadav, R. K.
    Sharma, P. C.
    Biswas, A. K.
    Chaudhari, S. K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2024, 161
  • [39] Combined use of compost and wood scraps to increase carbon stock and improve soil quality in intensive farming systems
    Scotti, R.
    D'Ascoli, R.
    Caceres, M. Gonzalez
    Bonanomi, G.
    Sultana, S.
    Cozzolino, L.
    Scelza, R.
    Zoina, A.
    Rao, M. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2015, 66 (03) : 463 - 475
  • [40] Irrigation, Straw, and Nitrogen Management Benefits Wheat Yield and Soil Properties in a Dryland Agro-Ecosystem
    Wang, Shujuan
    Tian, Xiaohong
    Liu, Ting
    Lu, Xinchun
    You, Donghai
    Li, Shuo
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (06) : 2193 - 2201