Optimal straw management co-benefits crop yield and soil carbon sequestration of intensive farming systems

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Enli [3 ]
Qian, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yingbo [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zongxin [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Kaichang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Engn Res Ctr Wheat & Maize, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Acad Agr Sci, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[3] CSIRO Agr & Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
farming system; greenhouse gas emission; soil carbon sequestration; straw return; wheat-maize double cropping system; N2O EMISSIONS; ORGANIC-MATTER; RESIDUE-CARBON; CHINA; DYNAMICS; INPUTS; WHEAT; DECOMPOSITION; IMPACTS; PLAIN;
D O I
10.1002/ldr.4610
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Straw retention has been widely recommended to sequester more soil organic carbon (SOC) in agricultural soils, while carbon sequestration may not respond linearly to additional carbon input amount. The response of SOC, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and economic income to different straw management methods in intensive wheat-maize double cropping systems still need systematical study. An 8-year field experiment was conducted in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain to investigate the impacts of optimal straw management (wheat straw was all crushed and spread on the soil surface, maize straw was all crushed and returned t into 0-15 cm soil layer) and optimal straw management (wheat straw was all crushed and spread on the soil surface, while maize straw was all harvested for feed) on SOC sequestrations, carbon economy and economic income. The results showed that only returning wheat straw into the field could maintain a similar crop yield (15.0 Mg ha(-1)) and SOC sequestration amount (9.06 Mg C ha(-1)) to the conventional straw management method. While this optimal straw management method kept a stable SOC sequestration rate of 1.24 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) when the SOC sequestration rate decreased from 1.76 to 1.20 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1) in the conventional method. The optimal management method also further reduced GHG emissions by 85.4% and using maize straw as stock feed increased net income by 28.3%. Only returning wheat straw could realize economic and environmental benefits win-win in the wheat-maize double cropping systems, which provides important background knowledge about safe and sustainable agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:2322 / 2333
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative assessment of different straw management practices on soil organic carbon and crop yield in the Chinese upland soils: A data-driven approach based on simulation and prediction model
    Ul Islam, Mahbub
    Jiang, Fahui
    Halder, Milton
    Barman, Alak
    Liu, Shuai
    Peng, Xinhua
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2024, 154
  • [22] The response of crop yield, carbon sequestration, and global warming potential to straw and biochar applications: A meta-analysis
    Liu, Rong
    Hu, Yiyun
    Zhan, Xiangsheng
    Zhong, Jiawang
    Zhao, Peng
    Feng, Hao
    Dong, Qin'ge
    Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 907
  • [23] Assessing soil carbon sequestration in upland rice systems using rice straw and mycorrhiza
    Syamsiyah, J.
    Sunarminto, B. H.
    Hanudin, E.
    Widada, J.
    Herawati, A.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE (ICCC 2018), 2018, 200
  • [24] Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture
    Sun, Wenjuan
    Canadell, Josep G.
    Yu, Lijun
    Yu, Lingfei
    Zhang, Wen
    Smith, Pete
    Fischer, Tony
    Huang, Yao
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (06) : 3325 - 3335
  • [25] Greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration and crop yields in a rain-fed rice field with crop rotation management
    Cha-un, Nittaya
    Chidthaisong, Amnat
    Yagi, Kazuyuki
    Sudo, Shigeto
    Towprayoon, Sirintornthep
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 237 : 109 - 120
  • [26] Soil carbon and nitrogen and tomato yield response to cover crop management
    Muchanga, Rafael A.
    Hirata, Toshiyuki
    Uchida, Yoshitaka
    Hatano, Ryusuke
    Araki, Hajime
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2020, 112 (03) : 1636 - 1648
  • [27] Cover cropping associated with no-tillage system promotes soil carbon sequestration and increases crop yield in Southern Brazil
    Besen, Marcos Renan
    Ribeiro, Ricardo Henrique
    Bratti, Felipe
    Locatelli, Jorge Luiz
    Schmitt, Djalma Eugenio
    Piva, Jonatas Thiago
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2024, 242
  • [28] Unlocking nitrogen management potential via large-scale farming for air quality and substantial co-benefits
    Li, Baojie
    Liao, Hong
    Li, Ke
    Wang, Ye
    Zhang, Lin
    Guo, Yixin
    Liu, Lei
    Li, Jingyi
    Jin, Jianbing
    Yang, Yang
    Gong, Cheng
    Wang, Teng
    Shen, Weishou
    Wang, Pinya
    Dang, Ruijun
    Liao, Kaihua
    Zhu, Qing
    Jacob, Daniel J.
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2024, 11 (10)
  • [29] Cover cropping associated with no-tillage system promotes soil carbon sequestration and increases crop yield in Southern Brazil
    Besen, Marcos Renan
    Ribeiro, Ricardo Henrique
    Bratti, Felipe
    Locatelli, Jorge Luiz
    Schmitt, Djalma Eugenio
    Piva, Jonatas Thiago
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2024, 242
  • [30] Co-benefits of a customized nutrient management approach tailored to smallholder farming for cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.)
    Liu, Mengjiao
    Yang, Binggeng
    Wang, Xiya
    Xu, Xinpeng
    Ding, Wencheng
    He, Ping
    Zhou, Wei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2025, 163