A prospective study of BurstDR™ spinal cord stimulation for non-operated discogenic low back pain

被引:2
|
作者
Mons, Martijn R. [1 ,2 ]
Chapman, Kenneth B. [3 ,4 ]
Terwiel, Chris [5 ]
Joosten, Elbert A. [1 ,2 ]
Kallewaard, Jan-Willem [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr MUMC, Univ Pain Clin Maastricht UPCM, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Maastricht, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci MHeNS, Dept Translat Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] New York Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Anesthesiol, Hempstead, NY USA
[5] Rijnstate Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Managmenent, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
burst stimulation; discogenic low back pain; spinal cord stimulation; BURST; PATIENT; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1111/papr.13181
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction: Chronic discogenic low back pain (CD-LBP) is caused by degeneration of the disc due to trauma to the annulus or by unprovoked degeneration, resulting in chronic pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) employing the BurstDR (TM) waveform has been shown to be an effective treatment in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The aim of this prospective case study was to determine the effect of BurstDR (TM) SCS on pain relief, disability, and patient satisfaction in a population with CD-LBP. Methods: Seventeen subjects with CD-LBP received a SCS trial with BurstDR (TM) stimulation. Patients with > 50% pain relief after a trial period of 2 weeks were permanently implanted (n = 15). Patients then rated LBP and leg pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EQ-5D quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain at baseline following trial, 3, 6, and 12 months after permanent implantation. Results: Treatment with BurstDR (TM) SCS resulted in significant reduction of LBP as the NRS was reduced from 71.7 +/- 7.3 at baseline to 42.5 +/- 18.1 at 12 months. Average pain relief at 12 months was 42.5%. In patients with leg pain (n = 8), pain was significantly reduced from 66.9 +/- 8.2 to 11.7 +/- 10.4 at 12 months. PainDETECT scores for neuropathic pain significantly reduced from 18.9 +/- 4.8 at baseline, and 14.8 +/- 3.2 at 12 months. Baseline ODI score significantly reduced from 41.2 +/- 12.8 to 25.8 +/- 8.6 at 12 months. PGIC scores remained low from 2.6 +/- 1.6 at 3 months, 2.5 +/- 1.0 at 6 months, and 2.5 +/- 1.3 at 12 months. EQ-5D-5L rates remained constant from baseline 56.10 +/- 23.9 to 68.6 +/- 12.9 at 12 months. Conclusion: BurstDR (TM) SCS resulted in significant reduction of back pain, leg pain, and quality of life in patients with CD-LBP and decreased the level of disability and generated positive patient satisfaction scores.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Karri, Jay
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Wahezi, Sayed
    Tang, Tuan
    Deer, Timothy
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2020, 23 (05) : 451 - 460
  • [32] Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Parameters in Patients with Predominant Back Pain
    Tiede, Jeffrey
    Brown, Lora
    Gekht, Gennady
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Yearwood, Thomas
    Morgan, Donna
    NEUROMODULATION, 2013, 16 (04): : 370 - 375
  • [33] High frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain
    Torres-Bayona, Sergio
    Mattar, Salvador
    Paula Arce-Martinez, Maria
    Miranda-Acosta, Yeiris
    Felipe Guillen-Burgos, Hernan
    Maloof, Dieb
    Sampron, Nicolas
    Farah, Jibril-Osman
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 23
  • [34] Comparing Conventional Medical Management to Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Low Back Pain in a Cohort of DISTINCT RCT Patients
    Deer, Timothy
    Heros, Robert
    Tavel, Edward
    Wahezi, Sayed
    Funk, Robert
    Buchanan, Patrick
    Christopher, Anne
    Weisbein, Jacqueline
    Gilligan, Christopher
    Patterson, Denis
    Antony, Ajay
    Ibrahim, Mohab
    Miller, Nathan
    Scarfo, Keith
    Johnson, Gayle
    Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni
    Okaro, Udoka
    Yue, James
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 2741 - 2752
  • [35] Efficacy Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Young Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain
    Zhang, Jianan
    Li, Qichang
    Du, Yu
    Yan, Zhengjian
    Chen, Liang
    Wang, Liyuan
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 665 - 674
  • [36] Spinal cord stimulation in conjunction with peripheral nerve field stimulation for the treatment of low back and leg pain: A case series
    Bernstein, Clifford A.
    Paicius, Richard M.
    Barkow, Stephen H.
    Lempert-Cohen, Cheryl
    NEUROMODULATION, 2008, 11 (02): : 116 - 123
  • [37] A prospective, randomized study of spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome
    North, RB
    Kidd, DH
    Piantadosi, S
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 84 (02) : 839 - 839
  • [38] Discogenic low back pain and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis - how appropriate is surgical treatment?
    Mayer, HM
    SCHMERZ, 2001, 15 (06): : 484 - 491
  • [39] The Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Axial Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis
    Conger, Aaron
    Sperry, Beau P.
    Cheney, Cole W.
    Burnham, Taylor M.
    Mahan, Mark A.
    Onofrei, Ligia, V
    Cushman, Daniel M.
    Wagner, Graham E.
    Shipman, Hank
    Teramoto, Masaru
    McCormick, Zachary L.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (11) : 2699 - 2712
  • [40] Updates on the Role of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Non-Surgical Chronic Lower Back Pain
    Aryal, Vinayak
    Poudel, Sujan
    Zulfiqar, Fizza
    Shrestha, Thakur
    Singh, Annie
    Shah, Shahtaj A.
    Soomro, Umar
    Choudhari, Jinal
    Quinonez, Jonathan
    Ruxmohan, Samir
    Amra, Amean
    Albert, Trevine
    Kemmerlin, Jesse
    Stein, Joel
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)