Impact of continuous glucose monitoring in youth with type 1 diabetes aged 15-21 years

被引:5
作者
Lee, Myron Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Holmes-Walker, Deborah Jane [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Farrell, Kaye [3 ]
Clark-Luccitti, Ashley [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Westmead Hosp, Dept Diabet & Endocrinol, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[3] Westmead Hosp, Dept Diabet & Endocrinol, Diabet Transit Support Programme, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
type; 1; diabetes; continuous glucose monitoring; youth; young adult; INSULIN-PUMP THERAPY; HYPOGLYCEMIA; ADULTS; FEAR;
D O I
10.1111/imj.15347
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background People with type 1 diabetes (T1D) aged <21 years are eligible for subsidised continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) products under the Australian National Diabetes Services Scheme. There are few real-world published studies to evaluate the benefits of CGM in young adults. Aims To perform a real-world observation study among youth with T1D to evaluate CGM use and benefits of CGM. Methods Patients at the Westmead Hospital Young Adult Diabetes Clinic aged 15-21 years who commenced CGM before July 2018 were followed for 6 months post commencement of CGM. Differences in HbA1c and glucose metrics at baseline and follow up are compared between those commencing CGM and those that did not. Results Forty-four (38%) of 115 eligible patients commenced CGM. Demographic characteristics and baseline HbA1c did not differ significantly between those started on CGM and those that did not. At 6 months, 18 (41%) of 44 patients still used CGM, with discomfort and inconvenience the most common reasons for dropout. In CGM continuers, at 6 months compared with baseline, there was no change in HbA1c (8.2% vs 8.0%; P = 0.8), coefficient of variation of glucose (38% vs 39%; P = 0.5) or percentage time in range (52% vs 58%; P = 0.3). Six-month follow-up HbA1c in CGM non-users deteriorated significantly compared with users. Mean hypoglycaemia fear scores (worry scale) were significantly decreased from baseline at 6 months (33 vs 18; P < 0.01). Conclusion There are high rates of discontinuation in CGM use among youth with T1D. At 6 months of CGM use, there was no significant change in glycaemic control, although HbA1c in non-users deteriorated significantly. Worry of hypoglycaemia was significantly decreased among those who continued CGM.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 215
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancies Affected by Type 1 Diabetes
    Gao, Valerie
    Snell-Bergeon, Janet K.
    Malecha, Emily
    Johnson, Carly A.
    Polsky, Sarit
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 26 (08) : 526 - 535
  • [42] Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on improving emotional well-being among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Klak, Anna
    Manczak, Malgorzata
    Owoc, Jakub
    Olszewski, Robert
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2021, 131 (09): : 808 - 818
  • [43] Model Identification using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data for Type 1 Diabetes
    Boiroux, Dimitri
    Hagdrup, Morten
    Mahmoudi, Zeinab
    Poulsen, Niels Kjolstad
    Madsen, Henrik
    Jorgensen, John Bagterp
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2016, 49 (07): : 759 - 764
  • [44] A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring with a Predictive Hypoglycemia Alert Function on Hypoglycemia in Physical Activity for People with Type 1 Diabetes (PACE)
    Rilstone, Sian
    Oliver, Nick
    Godsland, Ian
    Tanushi, Bruno
    Thomas, Maria
    Hill, Neil
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 26 (02) : 95 - 102
  • [45] Benefits and Barriers of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes
    Hilliard, Marisa E.
    Levy, Wendy
    Anderson, Barbara J.
    Whitehouse, Amanda L.
    Commissariat, Persis, V
    Harrington, Kara R.
    Laffel, Lori M.
    Miller, Kellee M.
    Van Name, Michelle
    Tamborlane, William, V
    DeSalvo, Daniel J.
    DiMeglio, Linda A.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 21 (09) : 493 - 498
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness of G5 Mobile continuous glucose monitoring device compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose alone for people with type 1 diabetes from the Canadian societal perspective
    Chaugule, Shraddha
    Graham, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (11) : 1128 - 1135
  • [47] Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Type 1 Diabetes
    Leelarathna, Lalantha
    Evans, Mark L. L.
    Neupane, Sankalpa
    Rayman, Gerry
    Lumley, Sarah
    Cranston, Iain
    Narendran, Parth
    Barnard-Kelly, Katharine
    Sutton, Christopher J. J.
    Elliott, Rachel A. A.
    Taxiarchi, Vicky P. P.
    Gkountouras, Georgios
    Burns, Matthew
    Mubita, Womba
    Kanumilli, Naresh
    Camm, Maisie
    Thabit, Hood
    Wilmot, Emma G. G.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (16) : 1477 - 1487
  • [48] Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
    Ellis, Samuel L.
    Naik, Ramachandra G.
    Gemperline, Kate
    Garg, Satish K.
    CURRENT DIABETES REVIEWS, 2008, 4 (03) : 207 - 217
  • [49] Continuous Glucose Monitoring Alarms in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: User Characteristics and the Impact of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Alarm Thresholds on Glycemic Control
    Gonzalez-Vidal, Tomas
    Rivas-Otero, Diego
    Agueria-Cabal, Pablo
    Ramos-Ruiz, Guillermo
    Delgado, Elias
    Menendez-Torre, Edelmiro
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 26 (05) : 313 - 323
  • [50] Comparison of Glycemic Metrics Measured Simultaneously by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes
    Norgaard, Sidse Kjaerhus
    Mathiesen, Elisabeth Reinhardt
    Norgaard, Kirsten
    Ringholm, Lene
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 23 (10) : 665 - 672