The role of zinc fertilization and its interaction with nitrogen and phosphorus starter fertilization on early maize development and grain yield

被引:2
|
作者
Capo, Luca [1 ]
Battisti, Michela [1 ]
Blandino, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Agr Forest & Food Sci, Largo Braccini 2, I-10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy
关键词
Diammonium phosphate; Early vigor; Seed treatment; Foliar treatment; Seed furrow; SEED TREATMENT; CORN; GROWTH; SOIL; ACCUMULATION; TEMPERATURES; IRON;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109245
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The early planting of maize in temperate growing areas leads to yield and quality benefits, although a low soil temperature can affect the early nutrient uptake and delay plant development. Not only can the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) uptake be limited, but that of zinc (Zn) can also be affected. Moreover, the application of N and P at early growth stages can result in an enhancement of maize growth. Two field experiment were carried out in North Italy during the 2012-14 period to: i) evaluate the most effective Zn application strategy by comparing seed, soil and foliar applications with an untreated control; ii) investigate the role of a Zn seed treatment on the early development and yield of maize grown in three different types of soils. The effect of Zn application was compared, in both experiments, to starter NP fertilization in bands at planting, according to a full factorial design. Zn fertilization significantly enhanced the early vigor and yield of the maize, although the effects were less pronounced than those of the NP fertilizer. Among the Zn fertilization strategies, maize growth was quicker for the seed and soil applications than for the foliar application or the untreated control. The former application significantly increased the plant height at stem elongation (+32%), shortened the planting-flowering period by 1 day, and increased the grain yield by 4%. Overall, the application of NP starter fertilizer shortened the plantingflowering period by 4.5 days and increased the yield by 10%, compared to the unfertilized control. In the second experiment, higher plant vigor indices were detected in all the soils for the NP starter fertilization (+22-27%) and for the Zn seed treatment (+3-9%) than in the controls. The NP starter fertilization reduced the grain moisture at harvest by 2.3% and increased grain yield by 14%, while the Zn treatment significantly increased the kernel weight but did not affect the grain yield or the moisture content. The interaction between the NP fertilization and the Zn treatment was never significant. Thus, the positive effect of Zn on the early vigor was an additional benefit to that produced by the starter NP fertilization. The study demonstrated that a Zn application at planting, with both a seed dressing and a soil treatment, significantly enhanced the early growth of different maize hybrids, in different growing seasons and soils, although the use of a NP starter fertilization led to more consistent agronomic benefits. Furthermore, the combination of NP and Zn starter fertilization resulted in a further advantage for all the considered production situations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agronomic strategies to enhance the early vigor and yield of maize part II: the role of seed applied biostimulant, hybrid, and starter fertilization on crop performance
    Capo, Luca
    Sopegno, Alessandro
    Reyneri, Amedeo
    Ujvari, Gergely
    Agnolucci, Monica
    Blandino, Massimo
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [2] The synergistic effect of nitrogen and phosphorus starter fertilization sub-surface banded at sowing on the early vigor, grain yield and quality of maize
    Blandino, Massimo
    Battisti, Michela
    Vanara, Francesca
    Reyneri, Amedeo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2022, 137
  • [3] Maize grain yield and grain zinc concentration response to zinc fertilization: A meta-analysis
    Mutambu, Dominic
    Kihara, Job
    Mucheru-Muna, Monicah
    Bolo, Peter
    Kinyua, Michael
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (05)
  • [4] MAIZE GRAIN YIELD RESPONSE TO VARIABLE ROW NITROGEN FERTILIZATION
    Edmonds, Daniel E.
    Tubana, Brenda S.
    Kelly, Jonathan P.
    Crain, Jared L.
    Edmonds, Matthew D.
    Solie, John B.
    Taylor, Randy K.
    Raun, William R.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2013, 36 (07) : 1013 - 1024
  • [5] RESPONSE OF GRAIN YIELD, PERCENT AND YIELD OF PROTEIN FOR PURE LINES OF MAIZE AND ITS DIALLEL CROSSES TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION
    Yahya, Shaimaa H.
    Dawod, Khalid M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 18 : 1727 - 1736
  • [6] Agronomic strategies to enhance the early vigor and yield of maize. Part I: the role of seed applied biostimulant, hybrid and starter fertilization on rhizosphere bacteria profile and diversity
    Ujvari, Gergely
    Capo, Luca
    Grassi, Arianna
    Cristani, Caterina
    Pagliarani, Irene
    Turrini, Alessandra
    Blandino, Massimo
    Giovannetti, Manuela
    Agnolucci, Monica
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [7] Rice Aboveground Nitrogen Content, Development, and Yield as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization and Flood Timing
    Richmond, Tyler L.
    Slaton, Nathan A.
    Hardke, J. T.
    Roberts, Trenton L.
    Norman, R. J.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2018, 110 (06) : 2626 - 2640
  • [8] Zinc Partitioning in Maize Grain after Soil Fertilization with Zinc Sulfate
    Kanwal, Shamsa
    Rahmatullah
    Ranjha, A. M.
    Ahmad, Rashid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 12 (02) : 299 - 302
  • [9] Effects of Straw Return and Nitrogen Fertilization on Grain Yield and Leaf Senescence of Maize in Northeast China
    Cheng, Minglei
    Zhan, Wenjie
    Chen, Shuaimin
    Lan, Tianjiao
    Liu, Zhiming
    Shao, Xiwen
    Wang, Lichun
    Lyu, Yanjie
    Wang, Yongjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2023, 17 (03) : 503 - 515
  • [10] Zinc fertilization of lentil for grain yield and grain zinc concentration in ten Saskatchewan soils
    Maqsood, Muhammad A.
    Schoenau, Jeff
    Vandenberg, Albert
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2016, 39 (06) : 866 - 874