Clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with different organ system infection: A retrospective observational study

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Haiyan [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Fengli [1 ]
Liu, Xiaoyun [1 ]
Huang, Jiabao [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Lingnan Hosp, Dept Gen Practice, 2693 Kaichuang Rd, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Gen Practice, 2693 Kaichuang Rd, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
etiology; microbiological identification; mNGS; precision diagnosis; treatment; PROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOGENS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000036745
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Microbiological identification is essential for appropriate treatment, but conventional methods are time-consuming and have a low sensitivity. In contrast, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a culture-free and hypothesis-free technique that can detect a wide array of potential pathogens. This study aimed to reveal the overall diagnostic value of mNGS for infectious diseases of different organ systems and compare the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS with conventional methods. In a retrospective cohort study, 94 patients with mNGS results were enrolled, and clinical data were recorded and analyzed to compare the positive rate of mNGS with traditional methods including as smears, serological tests, and traditional PCR, etc. In this study, mNGS and culture were both positive in 12.77% cases and were both negative in 23.4% cases. There were positive results in 56 cases (54.26%) only by mNGS and 4 cases (4.26%) were positive only by culture. There were significant differences in sensitivity of pathogen detection between of ID and NID group for mNGS (chi(2) = 10.461, P = .001)and conventional methods(chi(2) = 7.963, P = .005). The positive predictive values and negative predictive values of diagnosing infectious disease by mNGS were 94.12% and 30.77%, respectively. mNGS increased the sensitivity rate by approximately 53.66% compared with that of culture (78.05% vs24.39%; chi(2) = 47.248, P < .001) and decreased the specificity rate by 12.5% compared with that of culture (66.67% vs 100.0%; chi(2) = 4.8, P = .028). mNGS can identify emerging or rare pathogen and further guide treatment regimens. mNGS has advantages in identifying overall pathogens and bacteria, however, there was no obvious advantage in identifying fungi, virus and tuberculosis. mNGS has higher specificity than conventional methods in identifying pathogens and advantages in detecting emerging or rare pathogens.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of the clinical factors affecting the negative rate of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with spinal infection
    Zhang, Guang
    Liu, Qianfei
    He, Dan
    Hu, Xiaojiang
    Li, Yanbing
    Tang, Mingxing
    Liu, Shaohua
    Liu, Weiqiong
    Zhang, Hongqi
    Gao, Qile
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 111 (01) : 1458 - 1460
  • [42] Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for rapid molecular identification in spinal infection diagnosis
    Lv, Hui
    Liao, Sheng
    Shi, Zhenzhen
    Guo, Yuan
    Zhou, Jianhong
    Chen, Hui
    Luo, Fei
    Xu, Jianzhong
    Zhang, Zhongrong
    Zhang, Zehua
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [43] The diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in critically ill patients with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study
    Li, Chaozhong
    Wang, Fang
    Li, Wanrong
    Sun, Guihu
    Yang, Dexing
    Yang, Ting
    Yang, Guohui
    Liang, Bo
    Huang, Yun
    Tang, Wenzhi
    Li, Fei
    Ye, Yujia
    Qian, Chuanyun
    Wu, Haiying
    Meng, Zhaohui
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (41) : e39987
  • [44] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patients: a retrospective study
    Bao, Shujun
    Song, Huihui
    Chen, Yang
    Zhong, Caiming
    Tang, Hao
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [45] The role of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the pathogen detection of invasive osteoarticular infection
    Fang, Xinyu
    Cai, Yuanqing
    Chen, Xiaoqing
    Huang, Changyu
    Lin, Yiming
    Huang, Zida
    Zhang, Chaofan
    Huang, Ying
    Li, Wenbo
    Zhang, Wenming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 122 : 996 - 1001
  • [46] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pulmonary infections diagnosis in patients with diabetes
    Zhang, Siqin
    Ou, Jing
    Tan, Yuxue
    Yang, Bin
    Wu, Yaoyao
    Liu, Lin
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [47] Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in suspected intraocular infections
    Qian, Zhuyun
    Zhang, Yankun
    Wang, Lu
    Li, Ziqiang
    Wang, Hui
    Kang, Hao
    Feng, Jing
    Hu, Xiaofeng
    Tao, Yong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 33 (01) : 391 - 397
  • [48] Clinical Characteristics and the Effect of Timing for Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis
    He, Dehua
    Liu, Ming
    Chen, Qimin
    Liu, Ying
    Tang, Yan
    Shen, Feng
    Wang, Difen
    Liu, Xu
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2022, 15 : 7377 - 7387
  • [49] Diagnostic Role of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Tubercular-Associated Infection
    Wang, Boyong
    Wang, Qiaojie
    Li, Mingzhang
    Yu, Jinlong
    Jiang, Feng
    Hu, Yujie
    Guo, Geyong
    Chen, Xiaohua
    Tang, Jin
    Han, Pei
    Shen, Hao
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2024, 17 : 1951 - 1960
  • [50] Clinical application value of metagenome next-generation sequencing in pulmonary diffuse exudative lesions: a retrospective study
    Wu, Yisong
    Wu, Jian
    Xu, Nengluan
    Lin, Ming
    Yue, Wenxiang
    Chen, Yusheng
    Zhang, Qiongyao
    Li, Hongru
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 14