Clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with different organ system infection: A retrospective observational study

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Haiyan [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Fengli [1 ]
Liu, Xiaoyun [1 ]
Huang, Jiabao [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Lingnan Hosp, Dept Gen Practice, 2693 Kaichuang Rd, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Gen Practice, 2693 Kaichuang Rd, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
etiology; microbiological identification; mNGS; precision diagnosis; treatment; PROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOGENS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000036745
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Microbiological identification is essential for appropriate treatment, but conventional methods are time-consuming and have a low sensitivity. In contrast, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a culture-free and hypothesis-free technique that can detect a wide array of potential pathogens. This study aimed to reveal the overall diagnostic value of mNGS for infectious diseases of different organ systems and compare the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS with conventional methods. In a retrospective cohort study, 94 patients with mNGS results were enrolled, and clinical data were recorded and analyzed to compare the positive rate of mNGS with traditional methods including as smears, serological tests, and traditional PCR, etc. In this study, mNGS and culture were both positive in 12.77% cases and were both negative in 23.4% cases. There were positive results in 56 cases (54.26%) only by mNGS and 4 cases (4.26%) were positive only by culture. There were significant differences in sensitivity of pathogen detection between of ID and NID group for mNGS (chi(2) = 10.461, P = .001)and conventional methods(chi(2) = 7.963, P = .005). The positive predictive values and negative predictive values of diagnosing infectious disease by mNGS were 94.12% and 30.77%, respectively. mNGS increased the sensitivity rate by approximately 53.66% compared with that of culture (78.05% vs24.39%; chi(2) = 47.248, P < .001) and decreased the specificity rate by 12.5% compared with that of culture (66.67% vs 100.0%; chi(2) = 4.8, P = .028). mNGS can identify emerging or rare pathogen and further guide treatment regimens. mNGS has advantages in identifying overall pathogens and bacteria, however, there was no obvious advantage in identifying fungi, virus and tuberculosis. mNGS has higher specificity than conventional methods in identifying pathogens and advantages in detecting emerging or rare pathogens.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Application and Influencing Factor Analysis of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in ICU Patients With Sepsis
    Sun, Limin
    Zhang, Shuguang
    Yang, Ziyue
    Yang, Fei
    Wang, Zhenhua
    Li, Hongqiang
    Li, Yaoguang
    Sun, Tongwen
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [22] Clinical Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Sepsis Patients with Early Antibiotic Treatment
    Chen, Yongru
    Chen, Chongyue
    Chen, Wei
    Gai, Wei
    Zheng, Yafeng
    Guo, Yuxin
    Wang, Zhaoning
    Chen, Yongsong
    Cai, Zhiming
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2024, 17 : 4695 - 4706
  • [23] Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of infectious diseases
    Zhao, Yu
    Zhang, Wenhui
    Zhang, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [24] Clinical usefulness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for Talaromyces marneffei diagnosis in China: a retrospective study
    Zhang, Xuan
    Yao, Xinfei
    Chen, Huixin
    Yang, Meifang
    Han, Dongsheng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 43 (07) : 1367 - 1374
  • [25] Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in optimizing the diagnosis of ascitic infection in patients with liver cirrhosis
    Shi, Pei
    Liu, Juan
    Liang, An
    Zhu, Wentao
    Fu, Jiwei
    Wu, Xincheng
    Peng, Yuchen
    Yuan, Songsong
    Wu, Xiaoping
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] Experience of implementing metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with suspected pulmonary infection in clinical practice
    Lai, Yuting
    Chen, Binqi
    Chen, Sida
    Shen, Yan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [27] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pulmonary infection in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected individuals
    Sun, Luyao
    Zhang, Kaiyu
    Liu, Yong
    Che, Lihe
    Zhang, Peng
    Wang, Bin
    Du, Na
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [28] Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in cutaneous tuberculosis
    Kong, Min
    Li, Wei
    Kong, Qingsheng
    Dong, Haixin
    Han, Aizhong
    Jiang, Liqing
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [29] Clinical application and drug-use-guidance value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in central nervous system infection
    Lin, Ke
    Zhang, Hao-Cheng
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhou, Yang
    Fu, Zhang-Fan
    Wang, Hong-Yu
    Zhao, Yuan-Han
    Qiu, Chao
    Fan, Ming-Xiang
    Song, Jie-Yu
    Ai, Jing-Wen
    Zhang, Wen-Hong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 15 (01): : 47 - +
  • [30] Exploring the Clinical Utility of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Infection
    Guijuan Xie
    Bo Zhao
    Xun Wang
    Liang Bao
    Yiming Xu
    Xian Ren
    Jiali Ji
    Ting He
    Hongqing Zhao
    Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 1419 - 1435