Development and Optimization of A Low-Pressure Microbubble Scrubber for Air Pollutants Removal Using CFD

被引:1
作者
Park, H. [1 ,2 ]
Yang, S. [1 ]
Yoo, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Jung, J. [3 ]
Moon, I. [2 ]
Cho, H. [1 ]
Kim, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Ind Technol, Green Mat & Proc R&D Grp, Ulsan 44413, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[3] Hankook Engn Co Ltd, Ulsan 44413, South Korea
关键词
microbubble; low-pressure microbubble scrubber; removing air pollutants; CFD; fluid analysis; PARTICULATE MATTER; WASTE-WATER; FLOW; SIMULATION; GENERATION; REDUCTION; POLLUTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.3808/jei.202400506
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
. A microbubble scrubber is a hybrid type scrubber that combines the advantages of a general scrubber with the advantages of the microbubble. Microbubble which has generally under 50 lim diameter is one of the effective ways to remove air pollutants, like PM, NOx, and SOx. The low-pressure microbubble (LPMB) scrubber is a low-power, high-efficiency method that uses a blower to draw flue gas into the solution and generate microbubbles in the water by using low-pressure or negative pressure. The objective of this study was to enhance the removal efficiency of air pollutants in an LPMB scrubber by determining its optimal operating conditions for generating a large number of microbubbles. To achieve this, we developed a CFD model based on a pilot-scale LPMB scrubber and conducted case studies under different operating conditions using fluid flow analysis. The case study consisted of 12 cases according to the pressure difference (1,000, 3,000, 5,000, and 7,000 Pa) between the scrubber inlet and outlet and the initial water level (-0.2, 0, and +0.2 m). The simulation results showed that the optimal operating conditions were a pressure difference of 5,000 Pa and an initial water level of -0.2 m. The removal rates of PM, NOx, and SOx were 99.9, 92.6, and 99.0%, respectively when operating under the optimal operating conditions of the LPMB scrubber. The results suggest that the proposed optimal operating conditions can effectively enhance the removal efficiency of the LPMB scrubber.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 40
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment
    Agarwal, Ashutosh
    Ng, Wun Jern
    Liu, Yu
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2011, 84 (09) : 1175 - 1180
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, 9 out of 10 people worldwide breathe polluted air, but more countries are taking action
  • [3] ANSYS, 2013, Ansys Fluent Theory Guide
  • [4] Modeling of Microbubble Flow and Coalescence Behavior in the Contact Zone of a Dissolved Air Flotation Tank Using a Computational Fluid Dynamics-Population Balance Model
    Chen, Aqiang
    Yang, Wensan
    Geng, Shujun
    Gao, Fei
    He, Taobo
    Wang, Zhenbo
    Huang, Qingshan
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (36) : 16989 - 17000
  • [5] Uneven distribution of particle flow in RFCC reactor riser
    Cho, Hyungtae
    Kim, Junghwan
    Park, Chanho
    Lee, Kwanghee
    Kim, Myungjun
    Moon, Il
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 312 : 113 - 123
  • [6] Simulation and economic assessment of using H2O2 solution in wet scrubber for large marine vessels
    Choi, Yeongryeol
    Kim, Junghwan
    Moon, Il
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 194
  • [7] Cohen AJ, 2017, LANCET, V389, P1907, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6, 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6]
  • [8] Status of Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) systems from coal-fired power plants: Overview of the physic-chemical control processes of wet limestone FGDs
    Cordoba, Patricia
    [J]. FUEL, 2015, 144 : 274 - 286
  • [9] EEA, 2018, Environmental indicator report 2018: in support to the mon-itoring of the Seventh Environment Action Programme, DOI [10.2800/180334, DOI 10.2800/180334]
  • [10] Effect of salinity on air dissolution, size distribution of microbubbles, and hydrodynamics of a dissolved air flotation (DAF) system
    Fanaie, Vahid Reza
    Khiadani, Mehdi
    [J]. COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2020, 591 (591)