Scoring systems for risk stratification in upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding

被引:3
|
作者
Radaelli, Franco [1 ]
Rocchetto, Simone [2 ]
Piagnani, Alessandra [2 ]
Savino, Alberto [3 ]
Di Paolo, Dhanai [1 ]
Scardino, Giulia [1 ]
Paggi, Silvia [1 ]
Rondonotti, Emanuele [1 ]
机构
[1] Valduce Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Via Dante 10, I-22100 Como, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Via Festa Perdono 7, I-20122 Milan, MI, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Div Gastroenterol, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy
关键词
Gastrointestinal hemorrhages; Risk assessments; Risk scores; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Lower gastrointestinal bleeding; GLASGOW-BLATCHFORD SCORE; ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY; ROCKALL SCORE; VALIDATION; HEMORRHAGE; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101871
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Several scoring systems have been developed for both upper and lower GI bleeding to predict the bleeding severity and discriminate between low-risk patients, who may be suitable for outpatient management, and those who would likely need hospital-based interventions and are at high risk for adverse outcomes. Risk scores created to identify low-risk patients (namely the Glasgow Blatchford Score and the Oakland score) showed very good discriminative performances and their implementation has proven to be effective in reducing hospital admissions and healthcare burden. Conversely, the performances of risk scores in identifying specific adverse events to define high-risk patients are less accurate, and whether their integration into routine clinical practice has a tangible impact on patient management remains unproven.This review describes the existing risk score systems for GI bleeding, emphasizes key research findings, elucidates the circumstances in which their utilization can be beneficial, examines their constraints when considering routine clinical application, and discuss future development.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strengths and limitations of risk stratification tools for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a narrative review
    Alali, Ali A.
    Boustany, Antoine
    Martel, Myriam
    Barkun, Alan N.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 17 (08) : 795 - 803
  • [42] A novel scoring system to predict therapeutic intervention for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Ito, Nobuhito
    Funasaka, Kohei
    Furukawa, Kazuhiro
    Kakushima, Naomi
    Hirose, Takashi
    Muroi, Koichi
    Suzuki, Tomohiko
    Suzuki, Takahiro
    Hida, Emiko
    Ishikawa, Takuya
    Yamamura, Takeshi
    Ohno, Eizaburo
    Nakamura, Masanao
    Kawashima, Hiroki
    Miyahara, Ryoji
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (02) : 423 - 430
  • [43] Limits of pre-endoscopic scoring systems in geriatric patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Di Gioia, Giuseppe
    Sangineto, Moris
    Paglia, Annalisa
    Cornacchia, Maria Giulia
    Parente, Fernando
    Serviddio, Gaetano
    Romano, Antonino Davide
    Villani, Rosanna
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [44] Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Lu, Xuefeng
    Zhang, Xiaojie
    Chen, Hong
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2020, 112 (06) : 467 - 473
  • [45] Scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Which one scores better?
    Dhir, Vinay
    Shah, Rahul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 38 (02) : 95 - 97
  • [46] Which scoring systems are useful for predicting the prognosis of lower gastrointestinal bleeding? Old and new
    Jeong, Ku Bean
    Moon, Hee Seok
    In, Kyung Ryun
    Kang, Sun Hyung
    Sung, Jae kyu
    Jeong, Hyun Yong
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [47] The efficacy and comparison of upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scoring systems on predicting clinical outcomes among emergency unit patients
    Arikoglu, Sezer
    Tezel, Onur
    Buyukturan, Galip
    Basgoz, Bilgin Bahadir
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [48] The Glasgow Blatchford scoring system enables accurate risk stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
    Srirajaskanthan, R.
    Conn, R.
    Bulwer, C.
    Irving, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 64 (07) : 868 - 874
  • [49] Comparison of the AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford score for risk stratification in elderly patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Zhao, S. F.
    Qu, Q. Y.
    Feng, K.
    Song, M. Q.
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2017, 8 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [50] MH-STRALP: A scoring system for prognostication in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Hu, Jun-Nan
    Xu, Fei
    Hao, Ya-Rong
    Sun, Chun-Yan
    Wu, Kai-Ming
    Lin, Yong
    Zhong, Lan
    Zeng, Xin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (03):