Scoring systems for risk stratification in upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding

被引:3
|
作者
Radaelli, Franco [1 ]
Rocchetto, Simone [2 ]
Piagnani, Alessandra [2 ]
Savino, Alberto [3 ]
Di Paolo, Dhanai [1 ]
Scardino, Giulia [1 ]
Paggi, Silvia [1 ]
Rondonotti, Emanuele [1 ]
机构
[1] Valduce Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Via Dante 10, I-22100 Como, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Via Festa Perdono 7, I-20122 Milan, MI, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Div Gastroenterol, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy
关键词
Gastrointestinal hemorrhages; Risk assessments; Risk scores; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Lower gastrointestinal bleeding; GLASGOW-BLATCHFORD SCORE; ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY; ROCKALL SCORE; VALIDATION; HEMORRHAGE; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101871
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Several scoring systems have been developed for both upper and lower GI bleeding to predict the bleeding severity and discriminate between low-risk patients, who may be suitable for outpatient management, and those who would likely need hospital-based interventions and are at high risk for adverse outcomes. Risk scores created to identify low-risk patients (namely the Glasgow Blatchford Score and the Oakland score) showed very good discriminative performances and their implementation has proven to be effective in reducing hospital admissions and healthcare burden. Conversely, the performances of risk scores in identifying specific adverse events to define high-risk patients are less accurate, and whether their integration into routine clinical practice has a tangible impact on patient management remains unproven.This review describes the existing risk score systems for GI bleeding, emphasizes key research findings, elucidates the circumstances in which their utilization can be beneficial, examines their constraints when considering routine clinical application, and discuss future development.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of four scoring systems for risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Tuncer, Hakan
    Yardan, Turker
    Akdemir, Hizir Ufuk
    Ayyildiz, Talat
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 34 (03) : 649 - 654
  • [2] External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Anchu A.C.
    Mohsina S.
    Sureshkumar S.
    Mahalakshmy T.
    Kate V.
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, 36 (2) : 105 - 112
  • [3] Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Kalkan, Cagdas
    Soykan, Irfan
    Karakaya, Fatih
    Tuzun, Ali
    Gencturk, Zeynep Biyikli
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 17 (04) : 575 - 583
  • [4] Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study
    Stanley, Adrian J.
    Laine, Loren
    Dalton, Harry R.
    Ngu, Jing H.
    Schultz, Michael
    Abazi, Roseta
    Zakko, Liam
    Thornton, Susan
    Wilkinson, Kelly
    Khor, Cristopher J. L.
    Murray, Iain A.
    Laursen, Stig B.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [5] Utility of the Shock Index for Risk Stratification in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Rassameehiran, Supannee
    Teerakanok, Jirapat
    Suchartlikitwong, Sakolwan
    Nugent, Kenneth
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (11) : 738 - 743
  • [6] Emergency department risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Ali, Huma
    Lang, Eddy
    Barkan, Alan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [7] Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study
    Yang, Hae Min
    Jeon, Seong Woo
    Jung, Jin Tae
    Lee, Dong Wook
    Ha, Chang Yoon
    Park, Kyung Sik
    Lee, Si Hyung
    Yang, Chang Heon
    Park, Jun Hyung
    Park, Youn Sun
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [8] Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 Scoring Systems for Risk Stratification in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department
    Yaka, Elif
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Dogan, Nurettin Ozgur
    Pekdemir, Murat
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [9] Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Thanapirom, Kessarin
    Ridtitid, Wiriyaporn
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    Thungsuk, Rattikorn
    Noophun, Phadet
    Wongjitrat, Chatchawan
    Luangjaru, Somchai
    Vedkijkul, Padet
    Lertkupinit, Comson
    Poonsab, Swangphong
    Ratanachu-ek, Thawee
    Hansomburana, Piyathida
    Pornthisarn, Bubpha
    Thongbai, Thirada
    Mahachai, Varocha
    Treeprasertsuk, Sombat
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (04) : 761 - 767
  • [10] Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding
    Robertson, Marcus
    Ng, Jonathan
    Abu Shawish, Walid
    Swaine, Adrian
    Skardoon, Gillian
    Huynh, Andrew
    Deshpande, Sheetal
    Low, Zi Yi
    Sievert, William
    Angus, Peter
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 32 (05) : 761 - 768