A qualitative exploration of reproductive coercion experiences and perceptions in four geo-culturally diverse sub-Saharan African settings

被引:2
作者
Thomas, Haley L. [1 ]
Bell, Suzanne O. [1 ]
Karp, Celia [1 ]
Omoluabi, Elizabeth [2 ]
Kibira, Simon P. S. [3 ]
Makumbi, Frederick [3 ]
Galadanci, Hadiza [4 ]
Shiferaw, Solomon [5 ]
Seme, Assefa [5 ]
Moreau, Caroline [1 ,6 ]
Wood, Shannon N. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Univ Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Makerere Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Kampala, Uganda
[4] Bayero Univ Kano, Ctr Adv Med Res & Training, Kano, Nigeria
[5] Addis Ababa Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Reprod Hlth & Hlth Serv Management, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[6] CESP Ctr Res Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Soins Primaires & Prevent, U1018, Inserm, F-94800 Villejuif, France
[7] 615 N Wolfe St, E4644, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
SSM-QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH | 2024年 / 5卷
关键词
Reproductive coercion; Contraception; Reproductive health; Qualitative research; Sub-Saharan Africa; Couples; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; PREGNANCY; INTENTION; HEALTH; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100383
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Reproductive coercion (RC) is any intentional behavior that interferes with another's reproductive decisionmaking or pregnancy outcome. This study aims to qualitatively examine RC experiences and perceptions among women and men in Ethiopia, Nigeria (Kano and Anambra States), and Uganda. This is a secondary analysis utilizing qualitative data from the xxx study. Across sites, focus group discussions (38 groups; n=320 participants) and in-depth interviews (n=120) were conducted, recorded, and transcribed. Transcripts were loaded into Atlas.ti, and quotes describing experiences of reproductive control or abuse were coded as "reproductive coercion." RC quotes were input into a matrix for thematic analysis. Emergent RC themes included indirect reproductive pressures, direct family planning interference, concurrent experiences of violence, and responses to RC. Indirect reproductive pressures included tactics to both promote and prevent pregnancy, while direct interference centered on pregnancy promotion. Women who were not compliant with their partners' reproductive demands were often subjected to violence from multiple actors (i.e., parents, in-laws, community members) in addition to their partners. Despite concurrent forms of violence, women across sites resisted RC by using contraceptives covertly, choosing to abort, or leaving their abusive partnerships. Women and men across sites indicated that men were highly influential in fertility. RC behaviors were a mechanism of control over desired reproductive outcomes, which were often rooted in perceptions of childbearing as social status. Findings indicate a need for more nuanced community interventions targeting social norms, as well as improved RC screening and response within health services.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Polygyny and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 16 cross-sectional demographic and health surveys
    Ahinkorah, Bright Opoku
    [J]. SSM-POPULATION HEALTH, 2021, 13
  • [2] "Having a Child Meant I had a Real Life": Reproductive Coercion and Childbearing Motivations Among Young Black Men Living in Baltimore
    Alexander, Kamila A.
    Sanders, Renata Arrington
    Grace, Karen Trister
    Thorpe, Roland J.
    Doro, Elizabeth
    Bowleg, Lisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2021, 36 (17-18) : NP9197 - NP9225
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Gender and health
  • [4] Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study
    Boyce, Sabrina C.
    Uysal, Jasmine
    DeLong, Stephanie M.
    Carter, Nicole
    Undie, Chi-Chi
    Liambila, Wilson
    Wendoh, Seri
    Silverman, Jay G.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [5] Caldwell JC, 1996, J COMP FAM STUD, V27, P331
  • [6] Camp A. R., 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2388982, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2388982]
  • [7] Center for Reproductive Rights, 2023, WORLDS ABORTION LAWS
  • [8] Gendered power dynamics and threats to sexual and reproductive autonomy among adolescent girls and young adult women: A cross-sectional survey in three urban settings
    Decker, Michele R.
    Wood, Shannon N.
    Byrne, Meagan E.
    Yao-N'dry, Nathalie
    Thiongo, Mary
    Gichangi, Peter
    OlaOlorun, Funmilola M.
    Koffi, Alain K.
    Radloff, Scott
    Ahmed, Saifuddin
    Tsui, Amy O.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [9] Married very young adolescent girls in Niger at greatest risk of lifetime male partner reproductive coercion and sexual violence
    DeLong, Stephanie M.
    Brooks, Mohamad, I
    Aliou, Sani
    Lundgren, Rebecka
    Corneliess, Caitlin
    Johns, Nicole E.
    Challa, Sneha
    Carter, Nicole
    Lauro, Giovanna
    Silverman, Jay G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04):
  • [10] Dozier Jessica L, 2022, Contracept X, V4, P100084, DOI 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100084