What do healthcare providers think of the quality of uterotonics? A mixed-methods systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Torloni, Maria Regina [1 ]
Betran, Ana Pilar [2 ]
Corona, Martha Vazquez [3 ]
Bohren, Meghan [3 ]
Widmer, Mariana [2 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo Fed Univ, Evidence Based Healthcare Postgrad Program, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] WHO, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Programme, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Melbourne, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Gender & Womens Hlth Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
Maternal medicine; Adverse events; Toxicity; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Systematic Review; OXYTOCIN; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068442
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo synthesise evidence on the perceptions of healthcare providers (HCPs) about the quality of oxytocin and misoprostol available in their settings, and their actions as a result of these perceptions.DesignMixed-methods systematic review.Eligibility criteriaWe included quantitative and qualitative studies reporting HCPs' perceptions about oxytocin or misoprostol quality.Data sourcesWe searched CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ebscohost, Embase, PubMed, Global Index Medicus, Portal regional BVS, PsycNET, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to 31 March 2022 and grey literature.Risk of biasWe used the Center for Evidence-Based Management critical appraisal tool for surveys. For qualitative studies, we used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. We conducted separate quantitative and qualitative syntheses and integrated the evidence into a narrative synthesis (convergent segregated review design).ResultsWe included five (three quantitative and two qualitative) studies, of moderate or high quality, conducted in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In the three quantitative studies (N=7065 participants), 8.2-21.3% of HCPs had experienced problems due to known/suspected low-quality oxytocin and 3.3% due to low-quality misoprostol. In the two qualitative studies, perception of oxytocin quality varied. In quantitative studies, when confronted with suspected/known low-quality oxytocin, 29-78% of HCPs would inform a supervisor, 62% would document this in writing, 45-54% would change to another drug and 5-37% would double the dose of oxytocin. Qualitative evidence suggests that many HCPs do not formally report suspected low-quality oxytocin or misoprostol, and use higher doses or additional uterotonics.ConclusionsA proportion of HCPs from LMICs perceive oxytocin to be of low quality. There is very limited evidence on their perceptions about misoprostol. Many HCPs do not report suspected low-quality uterotonics but change to another medicine or double the dose of oxytocin.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022323812.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sensory-based approaches in psychiatric care: A systematic mixed-methods review
    Ma, Dongfei
    Su, Jianping
    Wang, Hong
    Zhao, Yingnan
    Li, Huanhuan
    Li, Yijing
    Zhang, Xu
    Qi, Yicheng
    Sun, Jiao
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (10) : 3991 - 4004
  • [42] Use of social network analysis methods to study professional advice and performance among healthcare providers: a systematic review
    Sabot, Kate
    Wickremasinghe, Deepthi
    Blanchet, Karl
    Avan, Bilal
    Schellenberg, Joanna
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [43] Evidence-based healthcare competence of social and healthcare educators: A systematic review of mixed methods
    Immonen, Kati
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Oikarinen, Anne
    Holopainen, Arja
    Kuivila, Heli
    Mannisto, Merja
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    Mattila, Outi
    Vesterinen, Soili
    Paatalo, Kati
    Koivunen, Kirsi
    Ylimaki, Saija
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2022, 108
  • [44] Do doctors and other healthcare professionals know overdiagnosis in screening and how are they dealing with it? A protocol for a mixed methods systematic review
    Piessens, Veerle
    Heytens, Stefan
    Van Den Bruel, Ann
    Van Hecke, Ann
    De Sutter, An
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [45] Game design elements of serious games in the education of medical and healthcare professions: a mixed-methods systematic review of underlying theories and teaching effectiveness
    Aster, Alexandra
    Laupichler, Matthias Carl
    Zimmer, Saskia
    Raupach, Tobias
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 29 (05) : 1825 - 1848
  • [46] Abortion stigma among abortion seekers, healthcare professionals and the public in high-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
    Bernard, Marie
    Niemann, Jana
    Weinhold, Laura
    Jepsen, Dennis
    Miani, Celine
    Luck-Sikorski, Claudia
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [47] Barriers to healthcare professionals screening, recognizing, and managing delirium in the adult patients receiving specialist palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Qian, Fang
    Yao, Danyang
    Shi, Huanhuan
    Tung, Tao-Hsin
    Bi, Dongjun
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2025, 24 (01):
  • [48] Vaccination coverage, beliefs, and attitudes in transplanted children and adolescents: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Herrero-Diez, Maria Teresa
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2023, 97
  • [49] A mixed-methods systematic review of interventions to improve leadership competencies of managers supervising nurses
    Chen, Wenjun
    Modanloo, Shokoufeh
    Graham, Ian D.
    Hu, Jiale
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Gifford, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (08) : 4156 - 4211
  • [50] End-of-life experiences in the dying process: scoping and mixed-methods systematic review
    Silva, Tais Oliveira
    Ribeiro, Henrique Goncalves
    Moreira-Almeida, Alexander
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 13 (E3) : e624 - e640