What do healthcare providers think of the quality of uterotonics? A mixed-methods systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Torloni, Maria Regina [1 ]
Betran, Ana Pilar [2 ]
Corona, Martha Vazquez [3 ]
Bohren, Meghan [3 ]
Widmer, Mariana [2 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo Fed Univ, Evidence Based Healthcare Postgrad Program, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] WHO, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Programme, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Melbourne, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Gender & Womens Hlth Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
Maternal medicine; Adverse events; Toxicity; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Systematic Review; OXYTOCIN; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068442
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo synthesise evidence on the perceptions of healthcare providers (HCPs) about the quality of oxytocin and misoprostol available in their settings, and their actions as a result of these perceptions.DesignMixed-methods systematic review.Eligibility criteriaWe included quantitative and qualitative studies reporting HCPs' perceptions about oxytocin or misoprostol quality.Data sourcesWe searched CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ebscohost, Embase, PubMed, Global Index Medicus, Portal regional BVS, PsycNET, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to 31 March 2022 and grey literature.Risk of biasWe used the Center for Evidence-Based Management critical appraisal tool for surveys. For qualitative studies, we used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. We conducted separate quantitative and qualitative syntheses and integrated the evidence into a narrative synthesis (convergent segregated review design).ResultsWe included five (three quantitative and two qualitative) studies, of moderate or high quality, conducted in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In the three quantitative studies (N=7065 participants), 8.2-21.3% of HCPs had experienced problems due to known/suspected low-quality oxytocin and 3.3% due to low-quality misoprostol. In the two qualitative studies, perception of oxytocin quality varied. In quantitative studies, when confronted with suspected/known low-quality oxytocin, 29-78% of HCPs would inform a supervisor, 62% would document this in writing, 45-54% would change to another drug and 5-37% would double the dose of oxytocin. Qualitative evidence suggests that many HCPs do not formally report suspected low-quality oxytocin or misoprostol, and use higher doses or additional uterotonics.ConclusionsA proportion of HCPs from LMICs perceive oxytocin to be of low quality. There is very limited evidence on their perceptions about misoprostol. Many HCPs do not report suspected low-quality uterotonics but change to another medicine or double the dose of oxytocin.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022323812.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coaching to develop leadership of healthcare managers: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Hu, Shuang
    Valimaki, Maritta
    Liu, Siying
    Li, Xianhong
    Shumaila, Batool
    Huang, Wenqiu
    Liu, Xincen
    Guo, Wendi
    Chen, Wenjun
    Chen, Jia
    Hu, Jiale
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [2] Quality of Life in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Dahan-Oliel, N.
    Oliel, S.
    Tsimicalis, A.
    Montpetit, K.
    Rauch, F.
    Dogba, M. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2016, 170 (01) : 62 - 76
  • [3] Healthcare professionals' competence in stroke care pathways: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Jarva, Erika
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Merilainen, Merja
    Karsikas, Eevi
    Koivunen, Kirsi
    Jounila-Ilola, Paivi
    Oikarinen, Anne
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (9-10) : 1206 - 1235
  • [4] What influences child feeding in the Northern Triangle? A mixed-methods systematic review
    Deeney, Megan
    Harris-Fry, Helen
    MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2020, 16 (04)
  • [5] How do people with eating disorders experience the stigma associated with their condition? A mixed-methods systematic review
    O'Connor, Cliodhna
    McNamara, Niamh
    O'Hara, Lesley
    McNicholas, Megan
    McNicholas, Fiona
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 30 (04) : 454 - 469
  • [6] Parents' and healthcare providers' perceptions, experiences, knowledge of, and attitudes toward kangaroo care of preterm babies in hospital settings: Mixed-methods systematic review
    Almutairi, Amal
    Gavine, Anna
    McFadden, Alison
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024, 51 (04): : 690 - 707
  • [7] Multiple sclerosis and identity: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Graziano, Federica
    Calandri, Emanuela
    Borghi, Martina
    Giacoppo, Ilenia
    Verdiglione, Jessica
    Bonino, Silvia
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, : 2199 - 2216
  • [8] A mixed-methods systematic review of the effects of mindfulness on nurses
    Guillaumie, Laurence
    Boiral, Olivier
    Champagne, Julie
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (05) : 1017 - 1034
  • [9] What do parents think about cyberbullying? A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Pardo-Gonzalez, Elizabeth
    Souza, Sidclay B.
    REVISTA DE EDUCACION, 2022, (397): : 97 - 124
  • [10] What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
    Backman, Chantal
    Crick, Michelle
    Cho-Young, Danielle
    Scharf, Megan
    Shea, Beverley
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7