Prediction of ground-state spin in odd-A nuclei within decision tree

被引:1
|
作者
Wen, Hu-Feng [1 ]
Shang, Tian-Shuai [1 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
Niu, Zhong-Ming [2 ]
Yang, Dong [1 ]
Xue, Yong-He [1 ]
Li, Xiang [1 ]
Huang, Xiao-Long [3 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Sch Phys, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Sch Phys & Optoelect Engn, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Atom Energy Sci, Key Lab Nucl Data, Beijing 102413, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ground-state spin; odd-A nuclei; machine learning; decision tree; MONTE-CARLO; DATA SHEETS; MODELS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.7498/aps.72.20230530
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Ground-state spin, as a fundamental parameter of nucleus, has consistently been a hot topic in research on nuclear data and structure. In this paper, we extensively investigate the odd-mass nuclei (odd -A nuclei) on the nuclide chart by using decision trees, including odd-proton nuclei (odd -Z nuclei) and odd-neutron nuclei (odd -N nuclei), and train ground-state spin prediction models of odd -Z nuclei and odd -N nuclei. In the case of randomly dividing the training set and validation set in a ratio of 75% to 25%, the accuracy rate of the training set and validation set for odd -Z nuclei reach 98.9% and 79.3%, respectively. The accuracy rate of the training set and validation set for the odd -N nuclei reach 98.6% and 71.6%, respectively. At the same time, by 1000 random selections of training set and validation set, after being validated repetitively, the standard error of the accuracy rate obtained can be less than 5%, further verifying the reliability and generalization performance of the decision tree. On the other hand, the accuracy rate of decision tree is much higher than those of theoretical models commonly used in nuclear structure research, such as Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov, covariant density functional theory, and finite range droplet model. Next, by taking all spin-determined odd -Z nuclei and odd -N nuclei as a learning set, the ground-state spin values for 254 spin undetermined but recommended odd -Z nuclei and 268 spin undetermined but recommended odd -N nuclei are predicted, with the predicted set coincidence rates reaching 68.5% and 69.0%, respectively. Finally, four odd-mass number chains, i.e. Z = 59, Z = 77, N = 41, and N = 59, are selected to compare the learning (prediction) results of the decision tree with the experimental (recommended) values of the corresponding nuclei, and to discuss the differences and similarities in the results given by the three theoretical models, thereby further demonstrating the research and application value of the decision tree in the ground-state spin of nuclei.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] An artificial neural network application on nuclear charge radii
    Akkoyun, S.
    Bayram, T.
    Kara, S. O.
    Sinan, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS G-NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)
  • [2] Neural network predictions of (n,2n) reaction cross-sections at 14.6 MeV incident neutron energy
    Akkoyun, Serkan
    Amrani, Naima
    Bayram, Tuncay
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2023, 191
  • [3] Akkoyun S, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2001.08561
  • [4] Estimations of first 2+ energy states of even-even nuclei by using artificial neural networks
    Akkoyun, Serkan
    Kaya, Huseyin
    Torun, Yunis
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2022, 96 (06) : 1791 - 1797
  • [5] Estimations of fission barrier heights for Ra, Ac, Rf and Db nuclei by neural networks
    Akkoyun, Serkan
    Bayram, Tuncay
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS E, 2014, 23 (10):
  • [6] Iterative Bayesian Monte Carlo for nuclear data evaluation
    Alhassan, Erwin
    Rochman, Dimitri
    Vasiliev, Alexander
    Hursin, Mathieu
    Koning, Arjan J.
    Ferroukhi, Hakim
    [J]. NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2022, 33 (04)
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2019, ENSDF DAT 5 16
  • [8] Nuclear mass systematics using neural networks
    Athanassopoulos, S
    Mavrommatis, E
    Gernoth, KA
    Clark, JW
    [J]. NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2004, 743 (04) : 222 - 235
  • [9] Nuclear Data Sheets for A=92
    Baglin, Coral M.
    [J]. NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS, 2012, 113 (10) : 2187 - +
  • [10] Bayesian Neural Network improvements to nuclear mass formulae and predictions in the SuperHeavy Elements region
    Banos Rodriguez, Ubaldo
    Zuniga Vargas, Cristofher
    Goncalves, Marcello
    Barbosa Duarte, Sergio
    Guzman, Fernando
    [J]. EPL, 2019, 127 (04)