Genotypic variation in functional contributors to yield for a diverse collection of field-grown cotton

被引:1
|
作者
Kaur, Navneet [1 ]
Snider, John L. [1 ]
Paterson, Andrew H. [2 ,3 ]
Virk, Gurpreet [1 ]
Parkash, Ved [1 ]
Roberts, Phillip [4 ]
Li, Changying [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Tifton, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Genet, Dept Plant Biol, Athens, GA USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Athens, GA USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Dept Entomol, Tifton, GA USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY; UPLAND COTTON; LINT YIELD; GOSSYPIUM-HIRSUTUM; SEEDLING VIGOR; FIBER QUALITY; GENETIC DIVERSITY; DRY-MATTER; COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE; CROP MATURITY;
D O I
10.1002/csc2.21232
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Yield improvement in cotton could be accelerated through selection for functional yield drivers such as interception of cumulative photosynthetically active radiation ( n-ary sumation IPAR), radiation use efficiency (RUE), and harvest index (HI). However, information on the extent to which these traits vary in cotton in the southeastern United States is limited. It was hypothesized that functional yield drivers would vary significantly within a diverse cotton collection. This study was conducted in Tifton and Athens, GA, and included a total of 4 site-years. Lint yield, total biomass production, n-ary sumation IPAR, RUE, and HI were all affected by genotype. Biomass was more strongly correlated with RUE than n-ary sumation IPAR. Even among the highest yielding genotypes, values for functional yield drivers (biomass and harvest index) differed significantly, indicating that high yields could be achieved by differentially manipulating these underlying traits. However, when considered for all genotypes, only HI exhibited a significant positive correlation with yield. Boll production and intra-boll yield components were also affected by genotype. When considered across upland genotypes, lint per boll, lint per seed, and lint percent were strongly associated with HI and lint yield, whereas boll mass and seed number per boll were not. We conclude that the genotypes evaluated in the current study achieve high lint production per boll and lint yields by manipulating different yield drivers. However, lint yield was primarily maximized through an increase in HI due to increases in boll production and within-boll distribution of biomass to fiber, not due to increases in total biomass production or boll size. Lint yield varied significantly across a diverse collection of cotton genotypes. Maximum lint yields were achieved by manipulating different functional yield drivers. Across all upland genotypes, harvest index was most strongly associated with lint yield. Harvest index was most associated with sympodial boll numbers, fiber per boll, and fiber per seed.
引用
收藏
页码:1846 / 1861
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Field-grown cotton shows genotypic variation in agronomic and physiological responses to waterlogging
    Zhang, Yanjun
    Li, Yan
    Liang, Tiantian
    Yuan, Yabin
    Li, Zhenhuai
    Xu, Shizhen
    Dai, Jianlong
    Fan, Shoujin
    Li, Cundong
    Dong, Hezhong
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2023, 302
  • [2] Quantifying physiological contributions to nitrogen-induced yield variation in field-grown cotton
    Pokhrel, Amrit
    Snider, John L.
    Virk, Simerjeet
    Sintim, Henry Y.
    Hand, Lavesta C.
    Vellidis, George
    Parkash, Ved
    Chalise, Devendra Prasad
    Lee, Joshua Mark
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2023, 299
  • [3] Differential Genotypic Response to Exogenous IAA in Field-Grown Upland Cotton
    Clement, Jenny
    Hague, Steve
    Gould, Jean
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2012, 16 (01): : 34 - 41
  • [4] Grain filling duration, a crucial determinant of genotypic variation of grain yield in field-grown tropical irrigated rice
    Yang, Woonho
    Peng, Shaobing
    Dionisio-Sese, Maribel L.
    Laza, Rebecca C.
    Visperas, Romeo A.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2008, 105 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [5] Water-induced variation in yield and quality can be explained by altered yield component contributions in field-grown cotton
    Hu, Wei
    Snider, John L.
    Wang, Haimiao
    Zhou, Zhiguo
    Chastain, Daryl R.
    Whitaker, Jared
    Perry, Calvin D.
    Bourland, Freddie M.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2018, 224 : 139 - 147
  • [6] 1-Methylcyclopropene Effects on the Physiology and Yield of Field-Grown Cotton
    Kawakami, Eduardo M.
    Oosterhuis, Derrick M.
    Snider, John L.
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2010, 14 (04): : 233 - 239
  • [7] 1-METHYLCYCLOPROPENE AND AMINOETHOXYVINYLGLYCINE EFFECTS ON YIELD COMPONENTS OF FIELD-GROWN COTTON
    de Brito, Giovani Greigh
    de Barcellos Ferreira, Alexandre Cunha
    Dias Coelho Borin, Ana Luiza
    Morello, Camilo de Lelis
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2013, 37 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [8] 1-Methylcyclopropene Effects on Field-Grown Cotton: Morphological Characteristics and Yield
    Maeda, Murilo M.
    Cothren, J. Tom
    Heilman, James L.
    Fernandez, Carlos J.
    Morgan, Gaylon D.
    da Costa, Vladimir A.
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2019, 23 (01): : 118 - 130
  • [9] Do genotypic differences in thermotolerance plasticity correspond with water-induced differences in yield and photosynthetic stability for field-grown upland cotton?
    Snider, John L.
    Chastain, Daryl R.
    Coillins, Guy D.
    Grey, Timothy L.
    Sorensen, Ronald B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2015, 118 : 49 - 55
  • [10] Pix plus and mepiquat chloride effects on physiology, growth, and yield of field-grown cotton
    Zhao, DL
    Oosterhuis, DM
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2000, 19 (04) : 415 - 422