Clearing the air: Public health concerns and support for natural gas restrictions in the United States

被引:2
作者
McLean, Elena V. [1 ]
Whang, Taehee [2 ]
Yang, Joonseok [3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA
[2] Yonsei Univ, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Natural gas; Energy; Natural gas ban; Public opinion; Climate change; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POLICY; POLARIZATION; PERCEPTIONS; FRACKING; POLITICS; OPINION; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2023.103404
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earlier policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. have often treated natural gas as a clean fuel due to its higher energy output per unit of carbon dioxide emitted compared to other fuels. However, recent local decarbonization initiatives seek to restrict residential uses of natural gas. Public support for such policies could be a key factor in determining whether local governments implement natural gas restrictions. It may also indicate the potential for state and federal governments to adopt similar measures. In this study, we conduct an online survey with 2623 U.S. adults to demonstrate how public support for natural gas restrictions varies based on policy framing. These framings include (1) household economic costs, (2) industry positions, (3) health impacts, (4) contribution to climate change, and (5) political support. Our results show that public support for policies to ban natural gas in new construction is significantly influenced by the health impact of these policies. This finding suggests that U.S. citizens are sensitive to non-economic health frames when evaluating a policy proposal to phase out natural gas use. Meanwhile, factors such as monthly energy costs, industry support, climate effects, and political backing show only a weak influence on public opinion regarding these policies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Debating clean energy: Frames, counter frames, and audiences
    Aklin, Michael
    Urpelainen, Johannes
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (05): : 1225 - 1232
  • [2] Willingness to pay and political support for a US national clean energy standard
    Aldy, Joseph E.
    Kotchen, Matthew J.
    Leiserowitz, Anthony A.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (08) : 596 - 599
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Residential building electrification in California: consumer economics, greenhouse gases and grid impacts
  • [4] Ansolabehere S., 2016, Clean and Cheap: How Americans Think About Energy in the Age of Global Warming
  • [5] Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption?
    Attari, Shahzeen Z.
    Schoen, Mary
    Davidson, Cliff I.
    DeKay, Michael L.
    de Bruin, Waendi Bruine
    Dawes, Robyn
    Small, Mitchell J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (06) : 1701 - 1710
  • [6] Basu R., 1999, J ENV MED, V1, P173, DOI 10.1002/JEM.28
  • [7] Green Priorities: How economic frames affect perceptions of renewable energy in the United States
    Bayulgen, Oksan
    Benegal, Salil
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 47 : 28 - 36
  • [8] Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design
    Bechtel, Michael M.
    Scheve, Kenneth F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (34) : 13763 - 13768
  • [9] Meta-analyses of fifteen determinants of public opinion about climate change taxes and laws
    Bergquist, Magnus
    Nilsson, Andreas
    Harring, Niklas
    Jagers, Sverker C.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (03) : 235 - +
  • [10] Energy policy and public opinion: patterns, trends and future directions
    Bergquist, Parrish
    Konisky, David M.
    Kotcher, John
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ENERGY, 2020, 2 (03):