Safety of Omitting Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Ureterolithotripsy

被引:0
|
作者
Falahatkar, Reza [1 ]
Falahatkar, Siavash [1 ]
Akhavan, Ardalan [1 ]
Esmaeili, Samaneh [1 ]
Kazemnezhad, Ehsan [1 ]
Abedi, Emad Moaied [1 ]
机构
[1] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Razi Hosp, Urol Res Ctr, Rasht, Iran
关键词
Antibiotic prophylaxis; Fever; Transurethral ureterolithotripsy; Urinary tract infection;
D O I
10.32592/ircmj.2023.25.7.2474
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL) is a common and highly efficient procedure for treating ureteral stones. The need for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post-TUL infections remains controversial. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether the removal of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis affects the rate of postoperative complications in patients undergoing TUL. Methods: A total of 62 patients (aged 15-65 years) undergoing TUL between November 2021 and March 2022 were included in this controlled clinical trial. Patients were divided into two groups by the available gradual and sequential sampling methods: 33 had positive preoperative urine culture (UC), and 29 had negative preoperative UC. None of the patients in the two groups received preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes, such as the operative time, stone-free rate, postoperative analgesic use, fever, urinary tract infection (UTI), and hospital stay, were reviewed in both groups. Results: Patients with positive UC were significantly older than those with negative UC (P=0.018), and had a higher BMI (P=0.016). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in most perioperative variables or postoperative outcomes (P>0.05). In addition, patients in the positive UC group had significantly more underlying diseases than the other group (P=0.022). Postoperative symptomatic UTI was found in neither of the two groups. Fever was reported in 3 (9.1%) and 1 ( 3.4%) patients in the positive and negative UC groups, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P=0.616). In the matched logistic regression model, the effect of preoperative UC on postoperative fever was not significant (P=0.40). Conclusion: The results of our study showed that prophylactic antibiotics can be eliminated at the discretion of the surgeon in patients without symptomatic positive UC.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antibiotic prophylaxis for transurethral prostatic resection in men with preoperative urine containing less than 100,000 bacteria per ml: A systematic review
    Qiang, W
    Wu, JC
    MacDonald, R
    Monga, M
    Wilt, TJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04) : 1175 - 1181
  • [32] Need for a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment protocol for patients with preoperative biliary drainage undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Camps-Lasa, Judith
    Garcia-Domingo, Maria Isabel
    Fonollosa, Eric Herrero
    Sosa, Maria Luisa Galaviz
    Recasens, Maria Galofre
    Campos, Aurora Rodriguez
    Serra-Aracil, Xavier
    Andorra, Esteban Cugat
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2024, 102 (10): : 540 - 547
  • [33] Prehospital Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Open Fractures: Practicality and Safety
    Lack, William
    Seymour, Rachel
    Bickers, Anna
    Studnek, Jonathan
    Karunakar, Madhav
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2019, 23 (03) : 385 - 388
  • [34] Preoperative preparation, antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical wound infection in breast surgery
    Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil
    de las Casas-Camara, Gonzalo
    Pita-Lopez, Maria Jose
    Robustillo-Rodela, Ana
    Diaz-Agero, Cristina
    Monge-Jodra, Vicente
    Fereres, Jose
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2011, 29 (06): : 415 - 420
  • [35] Audit of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in a surgical site infections surveillance network
    Rioux, C
    Blanchon, T
    Golliot, F
    Berrouane, Y
    Chalfine, A
    Costa, Y
    Laisné, MJ
    Levy, S
    Richard, L
    Seguier, JC
    Botherel, AH
    Astagneau, P
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2002, 21 (08): : 627 - 633
  • [36] Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in prosthetic joint infections: not a concern for intraoperative cultures
    Perez-Prieto, Daniel
    Portillo, Maria E.
    Puig-Verdie, Lluis
    Alier, Albert
    Gamba, Carlo
    Guirro, Pau
    Martinez-Diaz, Santos
    Horcajada, Juan P.
    Trampuz, Andrej
    Monllau, Joan C.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2016, 86 (04) : 442 - 445
  • [37] Different duration strategies of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an observational study
    Hamouda, Khaled
    Oezkur, Mehmet
    Sinha, Bhanu
    Hain, Johannes
    Menkel, Hannah
    Leistner, Marcus
    Leyh, Rainer
    Schimmer, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 10
  • [38] Comparison of Fluoroquinolones and Other Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens for Preventing Complications in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
    Tulone, Gabriele
    Giannone, Sofia
    Mannone, Piero
    Tognarelli, Alessio
    Di Vico, Tommaso
    Giaimo, Rosa
    Zucchi, Alessandro
    Rossanese, Marta
    Abrate, Alberto
    Pavan, Nicola
    Claps, Francesco
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Bartoletti, Riccardo
    Simonato, Alchiede
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (03):
  • [39] Different duration strategies of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an observational study
    Khaled Hamouda
    Mehmet Oezkur
    Bhanu Sinha
    Johannes Hain
    Hannah Menkel
    Marcus Leistner
    Rainer Leyh
    Christoph Schimmer
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 10
  • [40] Efficacy of 1 versus 3 days of intravenous amikacin as a prophylaxis for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: A prospective randomized trial
    Jayanth, Selvin Theodore
    Chandrasingh, J.
    Sahni, Rani Diana
    Mukha, Rajiv Paul
    Kumar, Santosh
    Devasia, Antony
    Kekre, Nitin Sudhakar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 37 (02) : 133 - 139