Understanding Human-Autonomy Teams Through a Human-Animal Teaming Model

被引:1
|
作者
Lum, Heather C. [1 ,3 ]
Phillips, Elizabeth K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Human Syst Engn, Fulton Sch Engn, Mesa, AZ USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept Psychol, Human Factors & Appl Cognit Grp, Fairfax, VA USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Fulton Sch Engn, Human Syst Engn, 7271 E Sonoran Arroyo Mall, Mesa, AZ 85212 USA
关键词
Human-animal teaming; Human-robot teaming; Human-autonomy teaming; Human-animal interaction; Working dogs; Animal-robot analog; PERFORMANCE; ANTHROPOMORPHISM; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/tops.12713
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The relationship between humans and animals is complex and influenced by multiple variables. Humans display a remarkably flexible and rich array of social competencies, demonstrating the ability to interpret, predict, and react appropriately to the behavior of others, as well as to engage others in a variety of complex social interactions. Developing computational systems that have similar social abilities is a critical step in designing robots, animated characters, and other computer agents that appear intelligent and capable in their interactions with humans and each other. Further, it will improve their ability to cooperate with people as capable partners, learn from natural instruction, and provide intuitive and engaging interactions for human partners. Thus, human-animal team analogs can be one means through which to foster veridical mental models of robots that provide a more accurate representation of their near-future capabilities. Some digital twins of human-animal teams currently exist but are often incomplete. Therefore, this article focuses on issues within and surrounding the current models of human-animal teams, previous research surrounding this connection, and the challenges when using such an analogy for human-autonomy teams. This article focuses on issues within and surrounding the current models of human-animal teams, previous research surrounding this connection, and the challenges when using such an analogy for human-autonomy teams.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 567
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Human-Autonomy Teaming Using Flexible Human Performance Models: An Initial Pilot Study
    Shannon, Christopher J.
    Horney, David C.
    Jackson, Kimberly F.
    How, Jonathan P.
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS IN ROBOTS AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS, 2017, 499 : 211 - 224
  • [32] Modeling operator self-assessment in human-autonomy teaming settings
    Cummings, Mary L.
    Li, Songpo
    Zhu, Haibei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2022, 157
  • [33] Sub-patterns for Human-Autonomy Teaming: Variations on a Delegation Theme
    Miller, Christopher A.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, (EPCE 2016), 2016, 9736 : 198 - 210
  • [34] Testing Human-Autonomy Teaming Concepts on a Global Positioning System Interface
    Russell, Ricky
    HUMAN INTERFACE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION: INFORMATION IN APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, HIMI 2018 HELD AS PART OF HCII 2018, PART II, 2018, 10905 : 450 - 464
  • [35] Human-autonomy Teaming: Need for a guiding team-based framework?
    O'Neill, Thomas A.
    Flathmann, Christopher
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Salas, Eduardo
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 146
  • [36] Designing High-Impact Experiments for Human-Autonomy / AI Teaming
    Flathmann, Christopher
    Mcneese, Nathan J.
    O'Neill, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2025,
  • [37] The forgotten teammate: Considering the labor perspective in human-autonomy teams
    Begerowski, Sydney R.
    Hedrick, Katelyn N.
    Waldherr, Flanagan
    Mears, Laine
    Shuffler, Marissa L.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 145
  • [38] Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human-autonomy teaming effectiveness
    Chen, Jessie Y. C.
    Lakhmani, Shan G.
    Stowers, Kimberly
    Selkowitz, Anthony R.
    Wright, Julia L.
    Barnes, Michael
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2018, 19 (03) : 259 - 282
  • [39] Trust Measurement in Human-Autonomy Teams: Development of a Conceptual Toolkit
    Krausman, Andrea
    Neubauer, Catherine
    Forster, Daniel
    Lakhmani, Shan
    Baker, Anthony L.
    Fitzhugh, Sean M.
    Gremillion, Gregory
    Wright, Julia L.
    Metcalfe, Jason S.
    Schaefer, Kristin E.
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [40] Low-rank human-like agents are trusted more and blamed less in human-autonomy teaming
    Gall, Jody
    Stanton, Christopher J.
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 7