Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study

被引:1
作者
You, Xiaolin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yanyun [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiao [1 ,2 ]
Min, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Kana [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Na [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, West China Univ Hosp 2, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, West China Univ Hosp 2, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Ctr Translat Med, Lab Mol & Translat Med, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; multi-port laparoscopic surgery; minimally invasive surgery; sing-port laparoscopy; endometrial cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PORT LAPAROSCOPY; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; HERNIA; LESS; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS).Materials and methods This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching.Results A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875).Conclusion TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Learning curve for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon [J].
Torng, Pao-Ling ;
Lin, Kuan-Hung ;
Hwang, Jing-Shiang ;
Liu, Hui-Shan ;
Chen, I-Hui ;
Chen, Chi-Ling ;
Huang, Su-Cheng .
GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2013, 2 (04) :126-131
[32]   'Scarless' Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery by the Combination of Mini-Laparscopic and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Equipment [J].
Kallidonis, Panagiotis ;
Georgiopoulos, Ioannis ;
Kyriazis, Iason ;
Al-Aown, Abdulrahman ;
Kontogiannis, Stavros ;
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ;
Liatsikos, Evangelos N. .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 92 (04) :414-421
[33]   Comparing outcomes of ovarian cystectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: A retrospective cohort study [J].
Chang, Chi-Han ;
Ding, Dah-Ching .
JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 86 (07) :682-687
[34]   The effectiveness of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy with hemoperitoneum [J].
Yang, Juseok ;
Na, Yong Jin ;
Song, Yong Jung ;
Choi, Ook Hwan ;
Lee, Sun Kyung ;
Kim, Hwi Gon .
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (01) :35-39
[35]   Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid or upper rectal cancer [J].
Mitsuyoshi Tei ;
Yozo Suzuki ;
Masahisa Ohtsuka ;
Kazuya Iwamoto ;
Atsushi Naito ;
Mitsunobu Imasato ;
Tsunekazu Mizushima ;
Hiroki Akamatsu .
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2022, 37 :1553-1560
[36]   Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid or upper rectal cancer [J].
Tei, Mitsuyoshi ;
Suzuki, Yozo ;
Ohtsuka, Masahisa ;
Iwamoto, Kazuya ;
Naito, Atsushi ;
Imasato, Mitsunobu ;
Mizushima, Tsunekazu ;
Akamatsu, Hiroki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (07) :1553-1560
[37]   Perioperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in hysterectomy: A comparative study [J].
Yuan, Wenhan ;
Yang, Fan ;
Zheng, Ying .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 165 (03) :1151-1157
[38]   Single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Sun, Ning ;
Zhang, Jialin ;
Zhang, Chengshuo ;
Shi, Yue .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 216 (06) :1205-1211
[39]   Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer: a Systematic Review [J].
Arslanca, Tufan ;
Arslanca, S. Banu ;
Dursun, Polat .
CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 9 (02) :45-50
[40]   Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy and cystectomy with the aid of a transurethral port: a feasibility study [J].
Su, Jian ;
Zhu, Qingyi ;
Yuan, Lin ;
Zhang, Yang ;
Zhang, Qingling ;
Wei, Yunfei .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (01) :111-118