Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study

被引:1
作者
You, Xiaolin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yanyun [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiao [1 ,2 ]
Min, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Kana [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Na [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, West China Univ Hosp 2, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, West China Univ Hosp 2, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Ctr Translat Med, Lab Mol & Translat Med, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; multi-port laparoscopic surgery; minimally invasive surgery; sing-port laparoscopy; endometrial cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PORT LAPAROSCOPY; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; HERNIA; LESS; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS).Materials and methods This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching.Results A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875).Conclusion TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case–control study
    So Hyun Ahn
    Joo Hyun Park
    Hye Rim Kim
    SiHyun Cho
    Myeongjee Lee
    Seok Kyo Seo
    Young Sik Choi
    Byung Seok Lee
    BMC Surgery, 21
  • [22] Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
    Song, Taejong
    Kim, Mi-La
    Jung, Yong Wook
    Yoon, Bo Sung
    Joo, Won Duk
    Seong, Seok Ju
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (04) : 317.e1 - 317.e9
  • [23] Comparison of modified transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: initial experience
    Shen, Yang
    Ye, Hesong
    Zhu, Qingyi
    Su, Jian
    Zhu, Chen
    Deng, Zhonglei
    Ma, Long
    Yuan, Lin
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2020, 15 (01) : 199 - 207
  • [24] Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in performing laparoscopic cryptorchidectomy in a cat
    Scussel Feranti, Joao Pedro
    de Oliveira, Marilia Teresa
    de Souza, Fernando Wiecheteck
    Dutra Correa, Luis Felipe
    Lemos Pinto Filho, Saulo Tadeu
    Dalmolin, Fabiola
    Hartmann, Hellen Fialho
    Brun, Mauricio Veloso
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2015, 45 (10): : 1826 - 1829
  • [25] Comparative analysis of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in ovarian cystectomy
    Huang, Lu
    Lin, Yong-Hong
    Yang, Yue
    Gong, Zhao-Lin
    He, Li
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (02) : 757 - 764
  • [26] The Comparison of Robotic Single-Site Surgery to Single-Port Laparoendoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Advanced-Stage Endometriosis
    Moon, Hye-Sung
    Shim, Ji Eun
    Lee, Sa Ra
    Jeong, Kyungah
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (12): : 1483 - 1488
  • [27] Therapeutic effect of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery versus triple-port laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cyst
    Zhang, Yihai
    Shi, Li
    Li, Chunfu
    Zhang, Bing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (12): : 14023 - 14030
  • [28] Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tuoheti, Zulipiyamu
    Han, Lili
    Mulati, Gulimire
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (12) : E24908
  • [29] Improvement of Gasless Laparoscopic Single-Site Lifting and Use in Surgery for Endometrial Carcinoma
    Zhao, Bingbing
    Lu, Xinqiu
    Gan, Xuli
    Yang, Zhijun
    Li, Li
    Zhang, Jieqing
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 51 (04)
  • [30] Learning curve for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon
    Torng, Pao-Ling
    Lin, Kuan-Hung
    Hwang, Jing-Shiang
    Liu, Hui-Shan
    Chen, I-Hui
    Chen, Chi-Ling
    Huang, Su-Cheng
    GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2013, 2 (04): : 126 - 131