Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study

被引:1
|
作者
You, Xiaolin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yanyun [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiao [1 ,2 ]
Min, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Kana [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Na [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, West China Univ Hosp 2, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, West China Univ Hosp 2, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Ctr Translat Med, Lab Mol & Translat Med, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; multi-port laparoscopic surgery; minimally invasive surgery; sing-port laparoscopy; endometrial cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PORT LAPAROSCOPY; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; HERNIA; LESS; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS).Materials and methods This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching.Results A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875).Conclusion TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment of Early Stage Endometrial Cancer by Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparison Study
    Cai, Hui-hua
    Liu, Mu-biao
    He, Yuan-li
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (14)
  • [2] First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study
    Fagotti, Anna
    Boruta, David M., II
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fanfani, Francesco
    Paglia, Amelia
    Escobar, Pedro F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04) : 353.e1 - 353.e6
  • [3] Robotic single-site surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer: a case-control study
    Sun, Hao
    Gao, Jinghai
    Jin, Zhijin
    Wu, Yuxian
    Zhou, Yang
    Liu, Xiaojun
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2021, 16 (03) : 597 - 603
  • [4] Role of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in the implementation ERAS in gynecology oncology: a retrospective study
    Li, Fanlin
    Zheng, Ying
    Chen, Sijing
    Wang, Qiao
    Wang, Kana
    Yang, Fan
    Liu, Jianhong
    Wang, Na
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [5] Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology
    Humphrey, John E.
    Canes, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 416 - 428
  • [6] Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery vs. multiport laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian cysts: a retrospective cohort study
    Shan, Shuzhi
    Zhao, Sufen
    Wang, Xiao
    BMC SURGERY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Transumbilical multi-port laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus transumbilical single-site laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: A retrospectively comparative study
    Liu, Dehong
    Zhou, Huixia
    Ma, Lifei
    Xie, Huawei
    Tao, Tian
    Cao, Hualin
    Zhou, Xiaoguang
    Luo, Xiaolong
    Chen, Shaojun
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2017, 13 (06) : 618.e1 - 618.e5
  • [8] Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
    Wang, Si-Yun
    Yin, Ling
    Guan, Xiao-Ming
    Xiao, Bing-Bing
    Zhang, Yan
    Delgado, Amanda
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (11) : 1305 - 1310
  • [9] Comparison of Transvaginal and Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Ovarian Cysts
    Zhang, Chunhua
    Duan, Kristina
    Fang, Fang
    Wu, Ling
    Xu, Quinn
    Delgado, Stephanie
    Shu, Fuxue
    Hu, Linyi
    Guan, Xiaoming
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2021, 25 (02)
  • [10] Feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology with conventional laparoscopic instruments
    de Poncheville, L.
    Smirnoff, A.
    Menard, J.
    Corbineau, G.
    Vie-Buret, V.
    Nohra, O.
    Leyre, S.
    Drapier, E.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2012, 40 (12): : 729 - 733