Evaluating Chatbot Efficacy for Answering Frequently Asked Questions in Plastic Surgery: A ChatGPT Case Study Focused on Breast Augmentation

被引:81
作者
Seth, Ishith [1 ,3 ]
Cox, Aram [1 ]
Xie, Yi [1 ]
Bulloch, Gabriella [2 ]
Hunter-Smith, David J. [1 ]
Rozen, Warren M. [1 ]
Ross, Richard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Peninsula Hlth, Dept Plast Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Alfred Ctr, Cent Clin Sch, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1093/asj/sjad140
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies into healthcare is transforming patient-practitioner interaction and could offer an additional platform for patient education and support. Objectives This study investigated whether ChatGPT-4 could provide safe and up-to-date medical information about breast augmentation that is comparable to other patient information sources. Methods ChatGPT-4 was asked to generate 6 commonly asked questions regarding breast augmentation and respond to them. Its responses were qualitatively evaluated by a panel of specialist plastic and reconstructive surgeons and reconciled with a literature search of 2 large medical databases for accuracy, informativeness, and accessibility. Results ChatGPT-4 provided well-structured, grammatically accurate, and comprehensive responses to the questions posed; however, it was limited in providing personalized advice and sometimes generated inappropriate or outdated references. ChatGPT consistently encouraged engagement with a specialist for specific information. Conclusions Although ChatGPT-4 showed promise as an adjunct tool in patient education regarding breast augmentation, there are areas requiring improvement. Additional advancements and software engineering are needed to enhance the reliability and applicability of AI-driven chatbots in patient education and support systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1126 / 1135
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Cosmetic tourism for breast augmentation: a systematic review [J].
Brightman, Louise ;
Ng, Sze ;
Ahern, Susannah ;
Cooter, Rodney ;
Hopper, Ingrid .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (09) :842-847
[2]   Breast Implant Imaging Surveillance among US Plastic Surgeons: US Food and Drug Administration Recommendations versus Clinical Reality [J].
Carr, Logan W. ;
Roberts, John ;
Mericli, Alex F. ;
Liu, Jun ;
Arribas, Elsa M. ;
Clemens, Mark W. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (06) :1381-1387
[3]   Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques [J].
Chae, Michael P. ;
Rozen, Warren Matthew ;
Spychal, Robert T. ;
Hunter-Smith, David J. .
GLAND SURGERY, 2016, 5 (02) :212-226
[4]  
Codner MA, 2001, CLIN PLAST SURG, V28, P587
[5]   Risk of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in a cohort of 3546 women prospectively followed long term after reconstruction with textured breast implants [J].
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Ghione, Paola ;
Ni, Andy ;
Hu, Qunying ;
Ganesan, Nivetha ;
Galasso, Natasha ;
Dogan, Ahmet ;
Horwitz, Steven M. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2020, 73 (05) :841-846
[6]  
GHALI S., 2023, PMFA J
[7]   Application of ChatGPT in Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: Ally or Antagonist? [J].
Gupta, Rohun ;
Pande, Parna ;
Herzog, Isabel ;
Weisberger, Joseph ;
Chao, John ;
Chaiyasate, Kongkrit ;
Lee, Edward S. .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2023, 43 (07) :NP587-NP590
[8]   Breast Augmentation [J].
Hidalgo, David A. ;
Spector, Jason A. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (04) :567E-583E
[9]   Silicone breast implant rupture: a review [J].
Hillard, Christopher ;
Fowler, Jason D. ;
Barta, Ruth ;
Cunningham, Bruce .
GLAND SURGERY, 2017, 6 (02) :163-168
[10]   Does Demand for Breast Augmentation Reflect National Financial Trends? [J].
Kearney, L. ;
Dolan, R. T. ;
Clover, A. J. ;
Kelly, E. J. ;
O'Broin, E. ;
O'Shaughnessy, M. ;
O'Sullivan, S. T. .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 41 (02) :293-297