Multisensor Data Fusion in IoT Environments in Dempster-Shafer Theory Setting: An Improved Evidence Distance-Based Approach

被引:12
作者
Hamda, Nour El Imane [1 ,2 ]
Hadjali, Allel [2 ]
Lagha, Mohand [1 ]
机构
[1] Blida 1 Univ, Aeronaut & Spatial Studies Inst, ASL, Blida 09000, Algeria
[2] Natl Engn Sch Mech & Aerotech, LIAS, F-86961 Futuroscope, France
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
multisensor data fusion; IoT; Dempster-Shafer theory; uncertainty; evidence distance; belief entropy; COMBINING BELIEF FUNCTIONS; S-EVIDENCE THEORY; FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; COMBINATION; CONFLICT; ENTROPY;
D O I
10.3390/s23115141
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In IoT environments, voluminous amounts of data are produced every single second. Due to multiple factors, these data are prone to various imperfections, they could be uncertain, conflicting, or even incorrect leading to wrong decisions. Multisensor data fusion has proved to be powerful for managing data coming from heterogeneous sources and moving towards effective decision-making. Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory is a robust and flexible mathematical tool for modeling and merging uncertain, imprecise, and incomplete data, and is widely used in multisensor data fusion applications such as decision-making, fault diagnosis, pattern recognition, etc. However, the combination of contradictory data has always been challenging in D-S theory, unreasonable results may arise when dealing with highly conflicting sources. In this paper, an improved evidence combination approach is proposed to represent and manage both conflict and uncertainty in IoT environments in order to improve decision-making accuracy. It mainly relies on an improved evidence distance based on Hellinger distance and Deng entropy. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, a benchmark example for target recognition and two real application cases in fault diagnosis and IoT decision-making have been provided. Fusion results were compared with several similar methods, and simulation analyses have shown the superiority of the proposed method in terms of conflict management, convergence speed, fusion results reliability, and decision accuracy. In fact, our approach achieved remarkable accuracy rates of 99.32% in target recognition example, 96.14% in fault diagnosis problem, and 99.54% in IoT decision-making application.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   A Novel Fuzzy Approach for Combining Uncertain Conflict Evidences in the Dempster-Shafer Theory [J].
An, Jiyao ;
Hu, Meng ;
Fu, Li ;
Zhan, Jiawei .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :7481-7501
[2]  
Awogbami G., 2018, P IEEE SOUTHEASTCON, DOI [10.1109/secon.2018.8478815, DOI 10.1109/SECON.2018.8478815]
[3]   An Evidence Theory Based Multi Sensor Data Fusion for Multiclass Classification [J].
Awogbami, Gabriel ;
Agana, Norbert ;
Nazmi, Shabnam ;
Yan, Xuyang ;
Homaifar, Abdollah .
2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2018, :1755-1760
[4]   DFIOT: Data Fusion for Internet of Things [J].
Boulkaboul, Sahar ;
Djenouri, Djamel .
JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (04) :1136-1160
[5]   A New Method to Handle Conflict when Combining Evidences Using Entropy Function and Evidence Angle with an Effective Application in Fault Diagnosis [J].
Chen, Lei ;
Diao, Ling ;
Sang, Jun .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
[6]   A novel weighted evidence combination rule based on improved entropy function with a diagnosis application [J].
Chen, Lei ;
Diao, Ling ;
Sang, Jun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS, 2019, 15 (01)
[7]   Weighted Evidence Combination Rule Based on Evidence Distance and Uncertainty Measure: An Application in Fault Diagnosis [J].
Chen, Lei ;
Diao, Ling ;
Sang, Jun .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
[8]   An Improved Approach of Incomplete Information Fusion and Its Application in Sensor Data-Based Fault Diagnosis [J].
Chen, Yutong ;
Tang, Yongchuan .
MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (11)
[9]  
DEMPSTER AP, 1968, J ROY STAT SOC B, V30, P205
[10]   Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence [J].
Deng, Y ;
Shi, WK ;
Zhu, ZF ;
Liu, Q .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2004, 38 (03) :489-493