The Impact of Professional Development on Data-Based Decision-Making for Students With Extensive Support Needs

被引:5
作者
Ruhter, Lindsay [1 ,2 ]
Karvonen, Meagan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Lawrence, KS USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Accessible Teaching Learning & Assessment Syst ATL, R Pearson Hall,1122 West Campus Rd, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
data-based decision-making; professional development; special education; extensive support needs; significant cognitive disabilities; general education curriculum access; INSTRUCTIONAL DECISIONS; ALTERNATE ASSESSMENTS; TEACHERS; METAANALYSIS; PLACEMENT; LITERACY; CAPACITY; PROGRESS; BELIEFS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1177/07419325231164636
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
There is evidence that data-based decision-making (DBDM) can improve outcomes for a wide range of students. However, less is known about how special education teachers are trained to use data to inform instruction that targets academic progress for students with extensive support needs (ESN). The purpose of this systematic literature review was to describe the intervention literature on professional development (PD) on teachers' use of DBDM for students with ESN. Eight studies were identified. The DBDM interventions primarily targeted teachers' decision-making related to instruction in individualized curricular goals or academics in functional contexts and were driven by data on isolated skills and concrete decision rules. All but one study documented some improvement in teacher or student outcomes after DBDM PD. Suggestions for future research, limitations of this review, and implications for practice including student progress in the general education curriculum are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 57
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Why Aren't Students with Severe Disabilities Being Placed in General Education Classrooms: Examining the Relations Among Classroom Placement, Learner Outcomes, and Other Factors [J].
Agran, Martin ;
Jackson, Lewis ;
Kurth, Jennifer A. ;
Ryndak, Diane ;
Burnette, Kristin ;
Jameson, Matt ;
Zagona, Alison ;
Fitzpatrick, Heather ;
Wehmeyer, Michael .
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2020, 45 (01) :4-13
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INDIVIDUALS DISABILI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 033 REL I ED SCI NAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WORKFORCE INNOVATION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NO CHILD LEFT ACT 20
[6]  
Bacon J, 2016, TEACH COLL REC, V118
[7]  
*Bolton M., 2014, THESIS MISSOURI BAPT
[8]  
Brookhart S., 2017, Formative Assessment for Students with Disabilities
[9]   A content analysis of the curricular philosophies reflected in states' alternate assessment performance indicators [J].
Browder, D ;
Spooner, F ;
Ahlgrim-Delzell, L ;
Flowers, C ;
Algozzine, B ;
Karvonen, M .
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2003, 28 (04) :165-181
[10]   AN INVIVO EVALUATION OF THE USE OF DATA-BASED RULES TO GUIDE INSTRUCTIONAL DECISIONS [J].
BROWDER, D ;
DEMCHAK, MA ;
HELLER, M ;
KING, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE HANDICAPS, 1989, 14 (03) :234-240