Assessment of Vulnerability Caused by Earthquake Disasters Based on DEA: A Case Study of County-Level Units in Chinese Mainland

被引:2
作者
Gao, Yuxin [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Xianrui [1 ,2 ]
Xi, Menghao [3 ]
Zhao, Qiuhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Emergency Support Simulat Technol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Disaster Prevent, Sch Emergency Management, Sanhe 065201, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
earthquake disaster; vulnerability decomposition; DEA; county level; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; EFFICIENCY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/su15097545
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earthquake activity can generate huge energy in a short period of time, bringing enormous risks to people's lives and property safety. This poses a great challenge to regional sustainable development. Meanwhile, due to the complex mechanism, seismic activity is difficult to accurately predict. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore how to reduce earthquake disaster losses from the perspective of human society. In this study, we use vulnerability to reflect the relative impact of earthquake disasters on different counties. The vulnerability caused by earthquakes is calculated with the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. We use CCR and BCC models to further decompose vulnerability into pure technology vulnerability and scale vulnerability. This study analyzes 69 earthquake disasters that occurred in the Chinese mainland from 2013 to 2020 and explores the influencing factors of pure technology vulnerability from both quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Three main conclusions are drawn. First, four factors, including the added value of the secondary industry, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, investment density of fixed assets and energy released by earthquakes, have a significant impact on the pure technical vulnerability of counties caused by earthquake disasters. Second, in the samples under consideration, the average vulnerability of the regions with an earthquake magnitude below 5.0 is higher than that of the regions with an earthquake magnitude between 5.0 and 6.0. There are deficiencies in organization, management and facilities in regions with a small earthquake risk. Third, through qualitative analysis, it is shown that the seismic function of buildings affects the vulnerability of counties facing earthquake disasters. The results of the research can provide decision makers with new insights into earthquake prevention and disaster reduction management.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Vulnerability
    Adger, W. Neil
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03): : 268 - 281
  • [2] Social Vulnerability Assessment Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Model for Earthquake Hazard in Tabriz City, Iran
    Alizadeh, Mohsen
    Alizadeh, Esmaeil
    Kotenaee, Sara Asadollahpour
    Shahabi, Himan
    Pour, Amin Beiranvand
    Panahi, Mahdi
    Bin Ahmad, Baharin
    Saro, Lee
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [3] A Hybrid Analytic Network Process and Artificial Neural Network (ANP-ANN) Model for Urban Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment
    Alizadeh, Mohsen
    Ngah, Ibrahim
    Hashim, Mazlan
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Pour, Amin Beiranvand
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [4] EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS FOR EXOGENOUSLY FIXED INPUTS AND OUTPUTS
    BANKER, RD
    MOREY, RC
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1986, 34 (04) : 513 - 521
  • [5] SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
    BANKER, RD
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) : 1078 - 1092
  • [6] New methodology for urban seismic risk assessment from a holistic perspective
    Carreno, Martha L.
    Cardona, Omar D.
    Barbat, Alex H.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 10 (02) : 547 - 565
  • [7] Charnes A., 1978, European Journal of Operational Research, V2, P429, DOI DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  • [8] CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters), EM DAT DAT
  • [9] A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators
    de Ruiter, Marleen C.
    Ward, Philip J.
    Daniell, James E.
    Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 17 (07) : 1231 - 1251
  • [10] Perceptions of earthquake early warnings on the US West Coast
    Dunn, Peter T.
    Ahn, Alicia Y. E.
    Bostrom, Ann
    Vidale, John E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2016, 20 : 112 - 122