Reduction potential of the energy penalty for CO2 capture in CCS

被引:21
作者
Zheng, Yawen [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Lin [1 ]
He, Song [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Hongguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Engn Thermophys, Lab Integrated Energy Syst & Renewable Energy, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CO2 capture and storage (CCS); CO2; separation; energy penalty; CARBON CAPTURE; COMBUSTION; ABSORPTION; STORAGE; POWER; CONVERSION; SOLVENTS; SYSTEM; CYCLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11708-023-0864-x
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
CO2 capture and storage (CCS) has been acknowledged as an essential part of a portfolio of technologies that are required to achieve cost-effective long-term CO2 mitigation. However, the development progress of CCS technologies is far behind the targets set by roadmaps, and engineering practices do not lead to commercial deployment. One of the crucial reasons for this delay lies in the unaffordable penalty caused by CO2 capture, even though the technology has been commonly recognized as achievable. From the aspects of separation and capture technology innovation, the potential and promising direction for solving this problem were analyzed, and correspondingly, the possible path for deployment of CCS in China was discussed. Under the carbon neutral target recently proposed by the Chinese government, the role of CCS and the key milestones for deployment were indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 399
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [51] Reiner DM, 2016, NAT ENERGY, V1, DOI [10.1038/NENERGY.2015.11, 10.1038/nenergy.2015.11]
  • [52] Roberts L, 2020, E3G
  • [53] Designing learning curves for carbon capture based on chemical absorption according to the minimum work of separation
    Rochedo, Pedro R. R.
    Szklo, Alexandre
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 108 : 383 - 391
  • [54] Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology
    Rochelle, Gary
    Chen, Eric
    Freeman, Stephanie
    Van Wagener, David
    Xu, Qing
    Voice, Alexander
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2011, 171 (03) : 725 - 733
  • [55] Scott V, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P105, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1695, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1695]
  • [56] Comparative net energy analysis of renewable electricity and carbon capture and storage
    Sgouridis, Sgouris
    Carbajales-Dale, Michael
    Csala, Denes
    Chiesa, Matteo
    Bardi, Ugo
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2019, 4 (06) : 456 - 465
  • [57] Pilot plant results for advanced CO2 capture process using amine scrubbing at the Jaworzno II Power Plant in Poland
    Stec, Marcin
    Tatarczuk, Adam
    Wieclaw-Solny, Lucyna
    Krotki, Aleksander
    Sciazko, Marek
    Tokarski, Stanislaw
    [J]. FUEL, 2015, 151 : 50 - 56
  • [58] Wagener D H V, 2011, THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI
  • [59] Wamsted Dennis, 2020, Petra Nova Mothballing Post-Mortem: Closure of Texas Carbon Capture Plant Is a Warning Sign
  • [60] Thermodynamic considerations on MEA absorption: Whether thermodynamic cycle could be used as a tool for energy efficiency analysis
    Wang, Junyao
    Sun, Taiwei
    Zhao, Jun
    Deng, Shuai
    Li, Kaixiang
    Xu, Yaofeng
    Fu, Jianxin
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 168 : 380 - 392