Effectiveness of mechanical recanalization for intraluminal occlusion of totally implantable venous access ports

被引:4
|
作者
Yang, Woo Jin [1 ]
Song, Myung Gyu [1 ]
Seo, Tae-Seok [1 ]
Park, Sung-Joon [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 148 Gurodong Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Ansan Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Ansan, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Venous access port; mechanical recanalization; intraluminal occlusion; clot occlusion; saline injection; TISSUE-PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR; RECOMBINANT UROKINASE; CATHETER OCCLUSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; VASCULAR ACCESS; SINGLE-ARM; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III; DEVICES; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.1177/11297298211034628
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate if the mechanical injection of saline is effective in restoring patency of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) with an intraluminal occlusion. Materials and methods: From January 2017 to June 2019, 64 cases of dysfunction of a TIVAP were referred to interventional radiology. Among these, 16 cases showed normal function of the TIVAP, 19 cases the showed the appearance of a fibroblastic sheath, and 29 cases showed intraluminal occlusion. Mechanical recanalization was performed for intraluminal occlusion of the TIVAP with an indeflator and a 20G non-coring needle. Linograms were performed in all recanalized cases. The success or failure of recanalization and the pressure of the indeflator were recorded. Linograms were evaluated for breakage or migration of catheters. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Among the 29 intraluminal occlusion cases, 24 cases (82.7%) were recanalized by mechanical recanalization via an indeflator. The pressure of the indeflator ranged from 29 to 220 psi (median: 118 psi). Linograms revealed breakage of the catheter of the TIVAP in two failed cases. The median interval from implantation to dysfunction was 405 days (range: 43-1723 days). The median interval from last use to dysfunction was 8 days (mean: 15.4 days; range: 1-119 days). The median re-occlusion free period after successful mechanical recanalization was 100.5 days (range: 6-859 days). Conclusion: In the absence of an available thrombolytic agent, mechanical injection of saline was a tolerable alternative method for restoring occluded catheters and sustaining the function of catheters. Because breakage of the catheter can occur during mechanical recanalization of a TIVAP, a linogram should follow the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 435
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perioperative and Postoperative Complications of Ultrasound-Guided Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports via the Brachiocephalic Vein in Patients with Cancer: A Prospective Study
    Sun, Xingwei
    Bai, Xuming
    Zhang, Yu
    Xu, Liang
    Yu, Zepeng
    Jin, Yong
    Zhuang, Zhixiang
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 12 (05): : 1379 - 1385
  • [42] Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports
    Nocito, A.
    Wildi, S.
    Rufibach, K.
    Clavien, P. -A.
    Weber, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (10) : 1129 - 1134
  • [43] Catheter fracture and pulmonary embolization of the distal fragment: A rare complication of the totally implantable venous access port
    Rebahi, H.
    El Adib, A. G.
    Mouaffak, Y.
    El Hattaoui, M.
    Chaara, A.
    Sadek, H.
    Khouchani, M.
    Mahmal, L.
    Younous, S.
    REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE, 2015, 36 (01): : 42 - 46
  • [44] Incidence and Risk Factors of Infectious Complications Related to Implantable Venous-Access Ports
    Shim, Jisue
    Seo, Tae-Seok
    Song, Myung Gyu
    Cha, In-Ho
    Kim, Jun Suk
    Choi, Chul Won
    Seo, Jae Hong
    Oh, Sang Cheul
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 15 (04) : 494 - 500
  • [45] Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: Catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception
    Plumhans, Cedric
    Mahnkena, Andreas H.
    Ocklenburg, Christina
    Keil, Sebastian
    Behrendt, Florian F.
    Guenther, Rolf W.
    Schoth, Felix
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 79 (03) : 338 - 342
  • [46] Risk factors for complications in cancer patients with totally implantable access ports: A retrospective study and review of the literature
    Bademler, Suleyman
    Ucuncu, Muhammed
    Yildirim, Ilknur
    Karanlik, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (02) : 702 - 709
  • [47] Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study
    Zhang, Hong
    Li, Yumei
    Zhu, Nannan
    Li, Yanfang
    Fu, Jinqiu
    Liu, Jing
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [48] Catheter malposition analysis of totally implantable venous access port in breast cancer patients
    Liu, Wenbo
    Han, Qingzheng
    Li, Lin
    Chi, Jiangrui
    Liu, Xinwei
    Gu, Yuanting
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [49] Femoral placement of totally implantable venous power ports as an alternative implantation site for patients with central vein occlusions
    Goltz, Jan P.
    Janssen, Hendrik
    Petritsch, Bernhard
    Kickuth, Ralph
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (02) : 383 - 387
  • [50] Primary Open Versus Closed Implantation Strategy for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports The Multicentre Randomized Controlled PORTAS-3 Trial (DRKS 00004900)
    Huettner, Felix J.
    Bruckner, Tom
    Hackbusch, Matthes
    Weitz, Juergen
    Bork, Ulrich
    Kotschenreuther, Peter
    Heupel, Oliver
    Kuemmel, Sabine
    Schlitt, Hans J.
    Mattulat, Matthias
    Pinter, Laszlo
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    Gutt, Carsten N.
    Nottberg, Hubertus S.
    Pohl, Alexander
    Ghanem, Firas
    Meyer, Thomas
    Imdahl, Andreas
    Neudecker, Jens
    Mueller, Verena A.
    Gehrig, Tobias
    Reineke, Mario
    von Frankenberg, Moritz
    Schumacher, Guido
    Hennes, Roland
    Mihaljevic, Andre L.
    Rossion, Inga
    Klose, Christina
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Diener, Markus K.
    Knebel, Phillip
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (06) : 950 - 960