The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students

被引:0
|
作者
Ju, Changting [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Ning [3 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Jiang, Xu [4 ]
Xue, Jinfeng [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, 152 Luoyu St, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Anyang Inst Technol, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Anyang Univ, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
[4] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol Studies Educ, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[5] Hunan Univ Chinese Med, Sch Nursing, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Mindful Self-Care Scale; MSCS; Brief-MSCS; Chinese college students; Validity; Reliability; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; POSITIVE BODY-IMAGE; EATING-DISORDERS; COMPASSION; TRANSLATION; PREVENTION; STIGMA; STRESS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s12671-024-02308-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMindful self-care is a way of embodied self-regulation that can safeguard and enhance psychological well-being. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among college students.MethodA total of 1486 college students (Mage = 19.36, SD = 1.16) from four different universities participated in this study. All participants completed a series of online surveys, including the MSCS, the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form, the Body Appreciation Scale-2, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the validity of the MSCS, and the R package measureQ was utilized to calculate the reliability. Additionally, we conducted comparative analyses involving the MSCS (33 items), its brief version (Brief-MSCS, 24 items), and previous relevant research.ResultsThe MSCS and Brief-MSCS demonstrated an acceptable factor structure, while the Brief-MSCS exhibited a more robust structure. Notably, the bifactor model adequately fitted the data for both versions. In bifactor model, each item not only belonged to its own group of factors but also belonged to a general factor. Both versions displayed satisfactory convergent validity, discriminant validity, concurrent validity, and robust composite reliability. Furthermore, Chinese college students exhibited a higher level of mindful self-care than Chinese medical professionals and a Western community sample.ConclusionsThe MSCS and Brief-MSCS have been found to be reliable and valid tools for assessing the levels of mindful self-care among college students, with the brief version showing superior performance. The robust fit of the bifactor model suggests that there is an overarching structure of mindful self-care that can be used to assess an individual's level through the total score. Moreover, there are differences in the level of mindful self-care among different groups, which need further verification.PreregistrationThis study is not preregistered.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 630
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and reliability of the Danish version of the 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale
    Ostergaard, Birte
    Mahrer-Imhof, Romy
    Lauridsen, Jorgen
    Wagner, Lis
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2017, 31 (02) : 405 - 412
  • [32] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE SELF-CARE ACTIVITIES SCREENING SCALE DURING COVID-19 LOCKDOWN
    Tarus, Hamide Arslan
    Yalazi, Rueveyda Olmez
    Oz, Tugba
    Demirci, Nurdan
    JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 8 (01): : 20 - 29
  • [33] Validity and reliability of the German version of the 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale
    Koeberich, Stefan
    Glattacker, Manuela
    Jaarsma, Tiny
    Lohrmann, Christa
    Dassen, Theo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2013, 12 (02) : 150 - 158
  • [34] Validity and reliability of the German version of the 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale
    Koeberich, S.
    Glattacker, M.
    Jaarsma, T.
    Lohrmann, C.
    Dassen, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2012, 11 : S8 - S9
  • [35] The reliability and construct validity of scores on the Japanese version of an academic self-concept scale for a sample of college students
    Paik, CM
    Michael, WB
    JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 45 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [36] Reliability and validity of simple Chinese version of grit scale for elementary school students
    Jie, Wang
    Xinyi, Wang
    Tao, Xin
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [37] Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Arthritis Self-Care Behaviors Scale
    Ni, Jieqing
    Zhang, Mingming
    Xu, Anqi
    Hu, Huiling
    Wu, Bilin
    Wu, Xue
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2025, 28 (01)
  • [38] Validity of the Turkish version of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale
    Baydemir, Canan
    Ozdamar, Kazim
    Unalir, Ahmet
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 13 (06): : 573 - 579
  • [39] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Brief Emotion and Regulation Beliefs Scale in Chinese nursing students
    Zhang, Dongmei
    Yang, Liu
    Wang, Congzhi
    Yuan, Ting
    Wei, Huanhuan
    Li, Jing
    Lei, Yunxiao
    Sun, Lu
    Li, Xiaoping
    Hua, Ying
    Liu, Mingming
    Liu, Haiyang
    Zhang, Lin
    BMC NURSING, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [40] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Brief Emotion and Regulation Beliefs Scale in Chinese nursing students
    Dongmei Zhang
    Liu Yang
    Congzhi Wang
    Ting Yuan
    Huanhuan Wei
    Jing Li
    Yunxiao Lei
    Lu Sun
    Xiaoping Li
    Ying Hua
    Mingming Liu
    Haiyang Liu
    Lin Zhang
    BMC Nursing, 21