The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students

被引:0
|
作者
Ju, Changting [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Ning [3 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Jiang, Xu [4 ]
Xue, Jinfeng [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, 152 Luoyu St, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Anyang Inst Technol, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Anyang Univ, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
[4] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol Studies Educ, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[5] Hunan Univ Chinese Med, Sch Nursing, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Mindful Self-Care Scale; MSCS; Brief-MSCS; Chinese college students; Validity; Reliability; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; POSITIVE BODY-IMAGE; EATING-DISORDERS; COMPASSION; TRANSLATION; PREVENTION; STIGMA; STRESS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s12671-024-02308-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMindful self-care is a way of embodied self-regulation that can safeguard and enhance psychological well-being. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among college students.MethodA total of 1486 college students (Mage = 19.36, SD = 1.16) from four different universities participated in this study. All participants completed a series of online surveys, including the MSCS, the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form, the Body Appreciation Scale-2, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the validity of the MSCS, and the R package measureQ was utilized to calculate the reliability. Additionally, we conducted comparative analyses involving the MSCS (33 items), its brief version (Brief-MSCS, 24 items), and previous relevant research.ResultsThe MSCS and Brief-MSCS demonstrated an acceptable factor structure, while the Brief-MSCS exhibited a more robust structure. Notably, the bifactor model adequately fitted the data for both versions. In bifactor model, each item not only belonged to its own group of factors but also belonged to a general factor. Both versions displayed satisfactory convergent validity, discriminant validity, concurrent validity, and robust composite reliability. Furthermore, Chinese college students exhibited a higher level of mindful self-care than Chinese medical professionals and a Western community sample.ConclusionsThe MSCS and Brief-MSCS have been found to be reliable and valid tools for assessing the levels of mindful self-care among college students, with the brief version showing superior performance. The robust fit of the bifactor model suggests that there is an overarching structure of mindful self-care that can be used to assess an individual's level through the total score. Moreover, there are differences in the level of mindful self-care among different groups, which need further verification.PreregistrationThis study is not preregistered.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 630
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students
    Changting Ju
    Ning Mo
    Wei Zhang
    Xu Jiang
    Jinfeng Xue
    Mindfulness, 2024, 15 : 616 - 630
  • [2] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-care Ability Scale for the Elderly
    Gao, Han
    Soderhamn, Ulrika
    Cliffordson, Christina
    Guo, Lina
    Guo, Qiyun
    Liu, Kun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (23-24) : 4489 - 4497
  • [3] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Diabetes Self-Care Scale
    Papatya Karakurt
    Magfiret Kasikci
    International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries, 2015, 35 : 148 - 156
  • [4] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Diabetes Self-Care Scale
    Karakurt, Papatya
    Kasikci, Magfiret
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIABETES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2015, 35 : S148 - S156
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the short version of the childhood abuse self report scale in Chinese college students
    Zhang, Yali
    Zhao, Jinxia
    Bian, Yuewen
    Zhang, Fuhai
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the contraceptive knowledge assessment scale in college students
    Zhang, Jiayang
    Tian, Maoting
    Xu, Lei
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the Geriatric Self-Care Scale among Chinese older adults
    Zeng, Hongji
    Zhao, Weijia
    Wang, Rui
    Wang, Xinao
    Luo, Pengchao
    Zhang, Xuyang
    Zeng, Xi
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2025, 57 (01)
  • [8] Validity and reliability of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale - Japanese version
    Kato, N.
    Ito, N.
    Kinugawa, K.
    Yao, A.
    Kazuma, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 85 - 85
  • [9] Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale
    Kato, Naoko
    Ito, Naomi
    Kinugawa, Koichiro
    Kazuma, Keiko
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2008, 7 (04) : 284 - 289
  • [10] Measuring self-as-context in Chinese college students: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of self-as-context scale (C-SACS)
    Fang, Shuanghu
    Huang, Mingjie
    Wang, Yiyi
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13