Relationship status moderates sexual prejudice directed toward lesbian women but not gay men

被引:0
作者
Cook, Corey L. [1 ,3 ]
Cottrell, Catherine A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Lutheran Univ, Dept Psychol, Tacoma, WA USA
[2] New Coll Florida, Social Sci Div, Sarasota, FL USA
[3] Pacific Lutheran Univ, Dept Psychol, 12180 Pk Ave S, Tacoma, WA 98447 USA
关键词
Affordance management; relationship status; sexual prejudice; social distance; ATTITUDES; STIGMA; HOMOSEXUALITY; RESPONSES; SINGLES;
D O I
10.1080/00224545.2024.2321580
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
To determine whether relationship status moderates sexual prejudice, we compared heterosexual men and women's self-reported social distancing toward gay and lesbian targets who varied in relationship status (coupled, single, no information). Relationship status of gay male targets did not affect responses (Study 1): heterosexual men reported increased social distancing toward gay compared to heterosexual male targets, whereas women did not. Similarly, in Study 2, heterosexual men reported increased social distancing toward lesbian compared to heterosexual female targets, but women did not, and men reported decreased social distancing toward single lesbian women. Working from an affordance management approach, Study 3 replicated Studies 1 and 2, testing potential mediators of effects. In particular, heterosexual men reported increased social distancing toward gay male targets, compared to responses from heterosexual women. Moreover, heterosexual women reported increased social distancing toward single, compared to coupled, lesbian targets, mediated through perceptions of undesired sexual interest from the target. This work demonstrates the nuanced nature of sexual prejudice and provides further evidence of the role of perceptions of undesired sexual interest in prejudiced responses toward lesbian and gay individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Record-high 70% in U.S. support same-sex marriage
[2]   Gender, relationship status, and stereotyping about sexual risk [J].
Conley, TD ;
Collins, BE .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2002, 28 (11) :1483-1494
[3]   Fundamental Motives Illuminate a Broad Range of Individual and Cultural Variations in Thought and Behavior [J].
Cook, Corey L. ;
Krems, Jaimie Arona ;
Kenrick, Douglas T. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 30 (03) :242-250
[4]   You Don't Know Where He's Been: Sexual Promiscuity Negatively Affects Responses Toward Both Gay and Straight Men [J].
Cook, Corey L. ;
Cottrell, Catherine A. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF MEN & MASCULINITIES, 2021, 22 (01) :63-76
[5]   Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice" [J].
Cottrell, CA ;
Neuberg, SL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 88 (05) :770-789
[6]  
Cottrell CA, 2013, FRONT SOC PSYCHOL, P29
[7]   Predicting policy attitudes from general prejudice versus specific intergroup emotions [J].
Cottrell, Catherine A. ;
Richards, David A. R. ;
Nichols, Austin Lee .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (02) :247-254
[9]   Heterosexual People's Reactions to Same-Sex Romantic or Sexual Overtures: The Role of Attitudes About Sexual Orientation and Gender [J].
Davis-Delano, Laurel R. ;
Kuchynka, Sophie L. ;
Bosson, Jennifer K. ;
Morgan, Elizabeth M. .
ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 49 (07) :2561-2573
[10]   The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles [J].
DePaulo, Bella M. ;
Morris, Wendy L. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (05) :251-254