The complementarity of DDR, nucleic acids and anti-tumour immunity

被引:36
|
作者
Kornepati, Anand V. R. [1 ]
Rogers, Cody M. M. [2 ]
Sung, Patrick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Curiel, Tyler J. J. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth, Dept Biochem & Struct Biol, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio MD Anderson Canc Ctr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth, Dept Med, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[5] Dartmouth Canc Ctr, Dartmouth Hlth, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[6] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03755 USA
关键词
MISMATCH REPAIR-DEFICIENT; CYTOSOLIC DNA; I INTERFERON; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; CHECKPOINT BLOCKADE; OPEN-LABEL; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; ADJUVANT NIVOLUMAB; PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1038/s41586-023-06069-6
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapy is a first-line treatment for selected cancers, yet the mechanisms of its efficacy remain incompletely understood. Furthermore, only a minority of patients with cancer benefit from ICB, and there is a lack of fully informative treatment response biomarkers. Selectively exploiting defects in DNA damage repair is also a standard treatment for cancer, spurred by enhanced understanding of the DNA damage response (DDR). DDR and ICB are closely linked-faulty DDR produces immunogenic cancer neoantigens that can increase the efficacy of ICB therapy, and tumour mutational burden is a good but imperfect biomarker for the response to ICB. DDR studies in ICB efficacy initially focused on contributions to neoantigen burden. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that ICB efficacy is complicated by the immunogenic effects of nucleic acids generated from exogenous DNA damage or endogenous processes such as DNA replication. Chemotherapy, radiation, or selective DDR inhibitors (such as PARP inhibitors) can generate aberrant nucleic acids to induce tumour immunogenicity independently of neoantigens. Independent of their functions in immunity, targets of immunotherapy such as cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) or PD-L1 can crosstalk with DDR or the DNA repair machinery to influence the response to DNA-damaging agents. Here we review the rapidly evolving, multifaceted interfaces between DDR, nucleic acid immunogenicity and immunotherapy efficacy, focusing on ICB. Understanding these interrelated processes could explain ICB treatment failures and reveal novel exploitable therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancers. We conclude by addressing major unanswered questions and new research directions.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The complementarity of DDR, nucleic acids and anti-tumour immunity
    Anand V. R. Kornepati
    Cody M. Rogers
    Patrick Sung
    Tyler J. Curiel
    Nature, 2023, 619 : 475 - 486
  • [2] Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity
    Castano, Ana P.
    Mroz, Pawel
    Hamblin, Michael R.
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2006, 6 (07) : 535 - 545
  • [3] Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity
    Ana P. Castano
    Pawel Mroz
    Michael R. Hamblin
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2006, 6 : 535 - 545
  • [4] MicroRNAs Involved in Anti-Tumour Immunity
    Yu, Hong W. H.
    Sze, Daniel M. Y.
    Cho, William C. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2013, 14 (03) : 5587 - 5607
  • [5] Rewiring macrophages for anti-tumour immunity
    Yunqin Lee
    Subhra K. Biswas
    Nature Cell Biology, 2016, 18 : 718 - 720
  • [6] Acid affairs in anti-tumour immunity
    Cappellesso, Federica
    Mazzone, Massimiliano
    Virga, Federico
    CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Germline control of anti-tumour immunity
    Harjes, Ulrike
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2020, 20 (08) : 414 - 414
  • [8] Germline control of anti-tumour immunity
    Ulrike Harjes
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2020, 20 : 414 - 414
  • [9] UNBLOCKING SERA IN ANTI-TUMOUR IMMUNITY
    不详
    NATURE, 1971, 233 (5315) : 92 - +
  • [10] Rewiring macrophages for anti-tumour immunity
    Lee, Yunqin
    Biswas, Subhra K.
    NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2016, 18 (07) : 718 - 720