Illicit Activity Detection in Bitcoin Transactions using Timeseries Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Maheshwari, Rohan [1 ]
Praveen, V. A. Sriram [1 ]
Shobha, G. [1 ]
Shetty, Jyoti [1 ]
Chala, Arjuna [2 ]
Watanuki, Hugo [2 ]
机构
[1] R V Coll Engn, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Bengaluru, India
[2] HPCC Syst LexisNexis Risk Solut, Alpharetta, GA USA
关键词
Bitcoin; time-series analysis; HPCC systems; random time interval; illicit activity detection;
D O I
10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140302
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A key motivator for the usage of cryptocurrency such as bitcoin in illicit activity is the degree of anonymity provided by the alphanumeric addresses used in transactions. This however does not mean that anonymity is built into the system as the transactions being made are still subject to the human element. Additionally, there is around 400 Gigabytes of raw data available in the bitcoin blockchain, making it a big data problem. HPCC Systems is used in this research, which is a data intensive, open source, big data platform. This paper attempts to use timing data produced by taking the time intervals between consecutive transactions performed by an address and make an Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Anderson-Darling test and Cramer -von Mises criterion, two addresses are compared to find if they are from the same source. The BABD-13 dataset was used as a source of illegal addresses, which provided both references and test data points. The research shows that time-series data can be used to represent transactional behaviour of a user and the algorithm proposed is able to identify different addresses originating from the same user or users engaging in similar activity.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting bitcoin price movements using sentiment analysis: a machine learning approach
    Gurrib, Ikhlaas
    Kamalov, Firuz
    STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2022, 39 (03) : 347 - 364
  • [42] Long Memory Analysis Using the GPH Method in Cryptocurrency Markets: The Case of Bitcoin
    Yurttaguler, Ipek M.
    EKONOMI POLITIKA & FINANS ARASTIRMALARI DERGISI, 2024, 9 (01): : 123 - 139
  • [43] Does transaction activity predict Bitcoin returns? Evidence from quantile-on-quantile analysis
    Hau, Liya
    Zhu, Huiming
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Sun, Wuqin
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2021, 55
  • [44] Evaluating Dimensionality Reduction Techniques in Bitcoin Ransomware Detection: Comparative Analysis of Incremental PCA and UMAP
    Amissah, Daniel Kwame
    Yaokumah, Winfred
    Ansong, Edward Danso
    Appati, Justice Kwame
    SECURITY AND PRIVACY, 2025, 8 (02):
  • [45] Predicting Bitcoin Trends Through Machine Learning Using Sentiment Analysis with Technical Indicators
    Jung H.S.
    Lee S.H.
    Lee H.
    Kim J.H.
    Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 2023, 46 (02): : 2231 - 2246
  • [46] A Study on adoption of Bitcoin in Taiwan-Using Big Data Analysis of Social Media
    Lu, Hsin-Ke
    Yang, Li-wei
    Lin, Peng-Chun
    Yang, Tzu-Han
    Chen, Alexander N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICCIP 2017), 2017, : 32 - 38
  • [47] To Fork or Not To Fork? Bitcoin Forks' Success Analysis Using Twitter Data: Preliminary Results
    Bouraga, Sarah
    2022 4TH CONFERENCE ON BLOCKCHAIN RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS FOR INNOVATIVE NETWORKS AND SERVICES (BRAINS), 2022, : 13 - 16
  • [48] Detecting intrusion transactions in databases using data item dependencies and anomaly analysis
    Hashemi, Sattar
    Yang, Ying
    Zabihzadeh, Davoud
    Kangavari, Mohammadreza
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2008, 25 (05) : 460 - 473
  • [49] Bitcoin price prediction based on other cryptocurrencies using machine learning and time series analysis
    Maleki, N.
    Nikoubin, A.
    Rabbani, M.
    Zeinali, Y.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2023, 30 (01) : 285 - 301
  • [50] Co-movement between RMB and Bitcoin with Effects of DCEP Using Wavelet Coherence Analysis
    Wu, Liang
    Zhang, Weifang
    FLUCTUATION AND NOISE LETTERS, 2023, 22 (04):