Universal Screening for Social-Emotional and Behavioral Risk: Differential Item Functioning on the SAEBRS

被引:2
|
作者
Izumi, Jared T. [1 ,3 ]
Eklund, Katie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol & Quantitat Fdn, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Educ Psychol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol & Quantitat Fdn, 361 Lindquist Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
universal screening; differential item functioning; social-emotional and behavior; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; TEACHER; ELEMENTARY; FRAMEWORK; SCALE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1037/spq0000542
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Universal screening for social-emotional and behavioral (SEB) risk is one strategy for schools to proactively identify students in need of additional supports and services. As schools serve an increasing number of children from racially and culturally diverse backgrounds, further research is needed to examine the differential functioning of brief behavior rating scales. The present study examined differential item functioning (DIF) on the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS)-Teacher Rating Scale. Participants included 11,496 kindergartens through 12th-grade students. DIF analyses were conducted by race/ethnicity, grade level, and biological sex. Results indicated small-to-large effects of DIF for teacher ratings of Black students compared to their non-Black peers on each item resulting in a moderate effect at the test level (Total Behavior [TB] expected test score standardized difference [ETSSD] = -0.67). There was a small-to-moderate effect of DIF for teacher ratings of White students compared to their non-White peers at the test level (TB ETSSD = 0.43). There was a small-to-moderate effect of DIF by biological sex, with teachers rating males differentially with high risk (TB ETSSD = -0.47). There were no significant effects at the test level for differences in ratings by grade level. Future research is needed to identify the factors influencing the interaction between the rater, the student, and the rating scale that could lead to resulting differential functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 246
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fatigue in Children With Sickle Cell Disease: Association With Neurocognitive and Social-Emotional Functioning and Quality of Life
    Anderson, Lindsay M.
    Allen, Taryn M.
    Thornburg, Courtney D.
    Bonner, Melanie J.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2015, 37 (08) : 584 - 589
  • [32] Twice as Nice? Sustained Exposure to a Universal Social-Emotional Learning Program Across Multiple Grades
    Hunter, Leah J.
    DiPerna, James C.
    Cheng, Weiyi
    Lei, Puiwa
    Hart, Susan Crandall
    SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 13 (01) : 84 - 100
  • [33] Differential Item Functioning of the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance-3 for White and Hispanic Students
    Lambert, Matthew C.
    Martin, Jodie
    Epstein, Michael H.
    Cullinan, Douglas
    JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2021, 29 (04) : 252 - 260
  • [34] A Comparison of Measures to Screen for Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Risk
    Miller, Faith G.
    Cohen, Daniel
    Chafouleas, Sandra M.
    Riley-Tillman, T. Chris
    Welsh, Megan E.
    Fabiano, Gregory A.
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2015, 30 (02) : 184 - 196
  • [35] Validity of social-emotional screening tool for newborns and infants: The effects of gender, ethnicity and age
    Antoniou, Faye
    Al-Khadim, Ghadah S.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [36] Differential Item Functioning for Boys and Girls in a Screening Instrument for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    Appelbaum, Sebastian
    Lefering, Rolf
    Wolff, Christian
    Tomasik, Martin J.
    Ostermann, Thomas
    GERMAN MEDICAL DATA SCIENCES: SHAPING CHANGE - CREATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR INNOVATIVE MEDICINE (GMDS 2019), 2019, 267 : 3 - 8
  • [37] Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function
    Eklund, Katie
    Kilgus, Stephen P.
    Taylor, Crystal
    Allen, Amanda
    Meyer, Lauren
    Izumi, Jared
    Beardmore, Megan
    Frye, Sara
    McLean, Deija
    Calderon, Fedra
    Kilpatrick, Kayla
    SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) : 678 - 691
  • [38] Screening for Student Mental Health Risk: Diagnostic Accuracy, Measurement Invariance, and Predictive Validity of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener-Student Rating Scale (SAEBRS-SRS)
    Nathaniel P. von der Embse
    Stephen P. Kilgus
    Stephanie Iaccarino
    Shana Levi-Nielsen
    School Mental Health, 2017, 9 : 273 - 283
  • [39] The Utility of Universal Screening to Guide School-Based Prevention Initiatives: Comparison of Office Discipline Referrals to Standardized Emotional and Behavioral Risk Screening
    Shereen Naser
    Jeffery Brown
    Jorge Verlenden
    Contemporary School Psychology, 2018, 22 (4) : 424 - 434
  • [40] A Critical Review of Five Commonly Used Social-Emotional and Behavioral Screeners for Elementary or Secondary Schools
    Lyndsay N. Jenkins
    Michelle K. Demaray
    Nicole Smit Wren
    Stephanie M. Secord
    Kelly M. Lyell
    Amy M. Magers
    Andrea J. Setmeyer
    Carlota Rodelo
    Ericka Newcomb-McNeal
    Jaclyn Tennant
    Contemporary School Psychology, 2014, 18 (4) : 241 - 254