Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders

被引:3
|
作者
Chanthana, Phongniwath [1 ]
Atthakomol, Pichitchai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Manosroi, Worapaka [3 ,4 ]
Wongpakaran, Tinakon [5 ]
Kraisarin, Jirachart [1 ]
Sananpanich, Kanit [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Musculoskeletal Sci & Translat Res Ctr, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Clin Epidemiol & Clin Stat Ctr, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[4] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[5] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient preference; Responsiveness; Hand; wrist; Injuries; Disorders; HAND QUESTIONNAIRE; UPPER EXTREMITY; SHOULDER; ARM; DISABILITIES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; SCALES; WRIST;
D O I
10.1186/s10195-022-00681-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were developed to examine patients' perceptions of functional health. Most studies compare the responsiveness of each type of questionnaire. However, reports of patient preferences among PROMs commonly used with patients with hand/wrist injuries or disorders are limited. This study aimed to compare patient preferences, factors associated with those preferences and responsiveness among the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and EQ-5D in patients with hand/wrist injuries or disorders.Material and methods This retrospective cohort study collected data on 183 patients with hand/wrist injuries or diseases who had visited a hand/wrist outpatient clinic or were hospitalized for surgery between 2017 and 2020. Patients had to be at least 18 years old and able to complete the four questionnaires included in the study. The four PROMs (DASH, MHQ, PRWHE and EQ-5D) were administered to the patients prior to treatment. After completing the questionnaires, patients were asked to answer two open-ended questions regarding their preferences. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors related to patient preferences. Results are presented as the relative risk ratio (RRR). The standardized response mean (SRM) was used to evaluate questionnaire responsiveness.Results Of the 183 patients, most preferred the PRWHE questionnaire (n = 74, 41%), with the main reasons cited being "specific to injuries/diseases and reflects hand/wrist function (n = 23, 31%) " and "easy to complete (n = 22, 30%). " Sex was found to be associated with patient preference after adjusting for demographic data and reasons for choosing a PROM as confounders (RRR = 0.46, P value = 0.049). The PRWHE had the highest SRM, followed by DASH (0.92 and 0.88, respectively).Conclusions The PRWHE is the most preferred by patients and is the most responsive questionnaire. It is recommended for use in clinical practice in situations where a clinician would like to use only one PROM for evaluating patients with various types of hand/wrist problems.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic Review of the Use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Studies of Electively-Managed Hand Conditions
    Lloyd-Hughes, Hawys
    Geoghegan, Luke
    Rodrigues, Jeremy
    Peters, Michele
    Beard, David
    Price, Andrew
    Jain, Abhilash
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-ASIAN-PACIFIC VOLUME, 2019, 24 (03) : 329 - 341
  • [32] Clinimetric Criteria for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Carrozzino, Danilo
    Patierno, Chiara
    Guidi, Jenny
    Berrocal Montiel, Carmen
    Cao, Jianxin
    Charlson, Mary E.
    Christensen, Kaj Sparle
    Concato, John
    De las Cuevas, Carlos
    De Leon, Jose
    Eory, Ajandek
    Fleck, Marcelo Pio
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Horwitz, Ralph I.
    Nierenberg, Andrew A.
    Rafanelli, Chiara
    Wang, Hongxing
    Wise, Thomas N.
    Sonino, Nicoletta
    Fava, Giovanni A.
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2021, : 222 - 232
  • [33] Patient-reported outcome measures for patients with hand-specific impairmentsd-A scoping review
    Woythal, L.
    Comins, J. D.
    Brorson, S.
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2021, 34 (04) : 594 - 603
  • [34] Patient-reported outcome measures in cerebrovascular neurosurgery
    Ramesh, Rithvik
    Haddad, Alexander F.
    Letchuman, Vijay
    Lee, Young M.
    Rinaldo, Lorenzo
    Abla, Adib A.
    Savastano, Luis E.
    Raper, Daniel M. S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 140 (05) : 1357 - 1368
  • [35] Using item response theory improved responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes measures in carpal tunnel syndrome
    Lyren, Per-Erik
    Atroshi, Isam
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (03) : 325 - 334
  • [36] Patient-reported outcome measures in knee injuries rehabilitation: A protocol for intervention
    Moreira, Jose
    Mesquita, Marina
    Flaminio, Jose
    de Almeida, Manuel
    Delgado, Bruno
    Boto, Paulo
    METHODSX, 2024, 12
  • [37] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Endometriosis
    Nicolas-Boluda, Alba
    Oppenheimer, Anne
    Bouaziz, Jerome
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [38] Patient-reported outcome measures in urology
    Narang, Gopal L.
    Pannell, Stephanie C.
    Laviana, Aaron A.
    Huen, Kathy H. Y.
    Izard, Jason
    Smith, Angela B.
    Bergman, Jonathan
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 366 - 374
  • [39] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Scoping Review
    Voet, Nicoline
    Pater, Ronne
    Garmendia, Joana
    Sistiaga, Andone
    Labayru, Garazi
    Gallais, Benjamin
    de Groot, Ingrid
    Muslemani, Samar
    Gagnon, Cynthia
    Graham, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 11 (03) : 567 - 577
  • [40] What Are the Minimally Important Changes of Four Commonly Used Patient-reported Outcome Measures for 36 Hand and Wrist Condition-Treatment Combinations?
    Hoogendam, Lisa
    Koopman, Jaimy Emerentiana
    van Kooij, Yara Eline
    Feitz, Reinier
    Hundepool, Caroline Anna
    Zhou, Chao
    Slijper, Harm Pieter
    Selles, Ruud Willem
    Wouters, Robbert Maarten
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 480 (06) : 1152 - 1166