Comparison of patient preferences and responsiveness among common patient-reported outcome measures for hand/wrist injuries or disorders

被引:3
|
作者
Chanthana, Phongniwath [1 ]
Atthakomol, Pichitchai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Manosroi, Worapaka [3 ,4 ]
Wongpakaran, Tinakon [5 ]
Kraisarin, Jirachart [1 ]
Sananpanich, Kanit [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Musculoskeletal Sci & Translat Res Ctr, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Clin Epidemiol & Clin Stat Ctr, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[4] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[5] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient preference; Responsiveness; Hand; wrist; Injuries; Disorders; HAND QUESTIONNAIRE; UPPER EXTREMITY; SHOULDER; ARM; DISABILITIES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; SCALES; WRIST;
D O I
10.1186/s10195-022-00681-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were developed to examine patients' perceptions of functional health. Most studies compare the responsiveness of each type of questionnaire. However, reports of patient preferences among PROMs commonly used with patients with hand/wrist injuries or disorders are limited. This study aimed to compare patient preferences, factors associated with those preferences and responsiveness among the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and EQ-5D in patients with hand/wrist injuries or disorders.Material and methods This retrospective cohort study collected data on 183 patients with hand/wrist injuries or diseases who had visited a hand/wrist outpatient clinic or were hospitalized for surgery between 2017 and 2020. Patients had to be at least 18 years old and able to complete the four questionnaires included in the study. The four PROMs (DASH, MHQ, PRWHE and EQ-5D) were administered to the patients prior to treatment. After completing the questionnaires, patients were asked to answer two open-ended questions regarding their preferences. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors related to patient preferences. Results are presented as the relative risk ratio (RRR). The standardized response mean (SRM) was used to evaluate questionnaire responsiveness.Results Of the 183 patients, most preferred the PRWHE questionnaire (n = 74, 41%), with the main reasons cited being "specific to injuries/diseases and reflects hand/wrist function (n = 23, 31%) " and "easy to complete (n = 22, 30%). " Sex was found to be associated with patient preference after adjusting for demographic data and reasons for choosing a PROM as confounders (RRR = 0.46, P value = 0.049). The PRWHE had the highest SRM, followed by DASH (0.92 and 0.88, respectively).Conclusions The PRWHE is the most preferred by patients and is the most responsive questionnaire. It is recommended for use in clinical practice in situations where a clinician would like to use only one PROM for evaluating patients with various types of hand/wrist problems.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stroke survivors’ preferences on assessing patient-reported outcome measures
    Richard Schmidt
    Daniela Geisler
    Daniela Urban
    Rebecca Pries
    Christina Franzisket
    Christian Voigt
    Galina Ivanova
    Thomas Neumuth
    Joseph Classen
    Markus Wagner
    Dominik Michalski
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7
  • [22] The Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) - development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for wrist disorders
    Beirer, Marc
    Serly, Julian
    Vester, Helen
    Pforringer, Dominik
    Cronlein, Moritz
    Deiler, Stephan
    Biberthaler, Peter
    Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2016, 17
  • [23] The Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) – development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for wrist disorders
    Marc Beirer
    Julian Serly
    Helen Vester
    Dominik Pförringer
    Moritz Crönlein
    Stephan Deiler
    Peter Biberthaler
    Chlodwig Kirchhoff
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17
  • [24] Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Slovenian Version of the Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM-Slo) in Patients with Wrist and Hand Disorders
    Bojnec, Vida
    Lonzaric, Dragan
    Rebec, Ziva Klarer
    ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2023, 62 (04): : 198 - 206
  • [25] Responsiveness and Internal Validity of Common Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Sciascia, Aaron D.
    Morris, Brent J.
    Jacobs, Cale A.
    Edwards, T. Bradley
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 40 (03) : E513 - E519
  • [26] Comparison of Reliability and Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Clinical Outcome Measures in Knee Osteoarthritis Rehabilitation
    Williams, Valerie J.
    Piva, Sara R.
    Irrgang, James J.
    Crossley, Chad
    Fitzgerald, G. Kelley
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2012, 42 (08) : 716 - 723
  • [27] The importance of patient-reported outcome measures in reconstructive urology
    Jackson, Matthew J.
    N'Dow, James
    Pickard, Rob
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (06) : 495 - 499
  • [28] Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for peripheral nerve disorders of the hand, the I-HaND© Scale
    Ashwood, Mark
    Jerosch-Herold, Christina
    Shepstone, Lee
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (08) : 864 - 874
  • [29] Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis
    Schaeffler, N.
    Schoenberg, P.
    Stephan, J.
    Stellmann, J. -P.
    Gold, S. M.
    Heesen, C.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 128 (02): : 114 - 121
  • [30] Choosing patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder pathology
    Padua, Roberto
    de Girolamo, Laura
    Grassi, Alberto
    Cucchi, Davide
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2021, 6 (09) : 779 - 787