Networked nexus of science diplomacy and domestic funding agency coordination: a case study of IntSam

被引:0
作者
Lundin, Hans [1 ]
Brostrom, Anders [2 ]
Geschwind, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Learning Engn Sci, Brinellvagen 68, S-11428 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Ind Econ & Management, Lindstedtsvagen 30, S-11428 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
GOVERNANCE; POLICY; INTERNATIONALIZATION;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scae011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study explores the role of network administrative organizations (NAOs) in science diplomacy (SD) by means of a qualitative case study approach. The case in point is a Swedish government initiative to coordinate the internationalization efforts of domestic funding agencies. We examine how the NAO IntSam balances between governmental directives and agency autonomy. Utilizing primary data from semi-structured interviews supplemented by internal documents and policy reports, the analysis delves into the challenges and potential of NAOs in harmonizing top-down directives with agency autonomy. The findings highlight IntSam's role in facilitating collaboration and aligning domestic and international policy landscapes, while also revealing inherent tensions due to divergent governmental and agency priorities. This study contributes to understanding the complexities of coordinating cross-border Science, Technology, and Innovation efforts, offering insights into the nuances, potentials, and limitations of NAOs in the realm of SD.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 706
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation [J].
Flanagan, Kieron ;
Uyarra, Elvira ;
Laranja, Manuel .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (05) :702-713
[22]   Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches [J].
Flink, Tim ;
Schreiterer, Ulrich .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2010, 37 (09) :665-677
[23]  
Government Bill of the Swedish Government, 2016, 20161750 GOV BILL SW
[24]  
Guy Peters B., 2015, Pursuing Horizontal Management, The Politics of Public Sector Coordination
[25]   Purposes and criteria in network governance evaluation: How far does standard evaluation vocabulary takes us? [J].
Hertting, Nils ;
Vedung, Evert .
EVALUATION, 2012, 18 (01) :27-46
[26]  
Jones M.D., 2014, SCI STORIES APPL NAR, DOI [10.1057/9781137485861, DOI 10.1057/9781137485861, DOI 10.1057/9781137485861_1]
[27]  
Klijn EH, 2016, GOVERNANCE NETWORKS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, P1
[28]  
Koppenjan JoopF. M., 2004, Managing Uncertainties in Networks, DOI [10.4324/9780203643457, DOI 10.4324/9780203643457]
[29]  
Lepori B.e., 2007, Science and Public Policy, V34, P372, DOI DOI 10.3152/030234207X234578
[30]   Coordination modes in public funding systems [J].
Lepori, Benedetto .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (03) :355-367