An artificial intelligence based abdominal aortic aneurysm prognosis classifier to predict patient outcomes

被引:4
|
作者
Chung, Timothy K. [1 ]
Gueldner, Pete H. [1 ]
Aloziem, Okechukwu U. [2 ]
Liang, Nathan L. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Vorp, David A. [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, McGowan Inst Regenerat Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[9] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Mech Engn & Mat Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[10] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Vasc Remodeling & Regenerat, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[11] Univ Pittsburgh, Bioengn Cardiothorac Surg Surg Chem & Petr Engn &, Ctr Bioengn, 300 Technol Dr,Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
关键词
MECHANICAL WALL STRESS; INTRALUMINAL THROMBUS; MODELS; BIOMECHANICS; BEHAVIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-53459-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) have been rigorously investigated to understand when their clinically-estimated risk of rupture-an event that is the 13th leading cause of death in the US-exceeds the risk associated with repair. Yet the current clinical guideline remains a one-size-fits-all "maximum diameter criterion" whereby AAA exceeding a threshold diameter is thought to make the risk of rupture high enough to warrant intervention. However, between 7 and 23.4% of smaller-sized AAA have been reported to rupture with diameters below the threshold. In this study, we train and assess machine learning models using clinical, biomechanical, and morphological indices from 381 patients to develop an aneurysm prognosis classifier to predict one of three outcomes for a given AAA patient: their AAA will remain stable, their AAA will require repair based as currently indicated from the maximum diameter criterion, or their AAA will rupture. This study represents the largest cohort of AAA patients that utilizes the first available medical image and clinical data to classify patient outcomes. The APC model therefore represents a potential clinical tool to striate specific patient outcomes using machine learning models and patient-specific image-based (biomechanical and morphological) and clinical data as input. Such a tool could greatly assist clinicians in their management decisions for patients with AAA.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frailty in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm predicts prognosis after elective endovascular aneurysm repair
    Morisaki, Koichi
    Furuyama, Tadashi
    Yoshiya, Keiji
    Kurose, Shun
    Yoshino, Shinichiro
    Nakayama, Ken
    Yamashita, Sho
    Kawakubo, Eisuke
    Matsumoto, Takuya
    Mori, Masaki
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : 138 - 143
  • [22] Medical image-based simulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth
    Zeinali-Davarani, S.
    Baek, S.
    MECHANICS RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 42 : 107 - 117
  • [23] Applying Artificial Intelligence to Predict Complications After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Long, Becky
    Cremat, Danielle L.
    Serpa, Eduardo
    Qian, Sinong
    Blebea, John
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 58 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [24] On the influence of patient-specific material properties in computational simulations: A case study of a large ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Doyle, Barry J.
    Callanan, Anthony
    Grace, Pierce A.
    Kavanagh, Eamon G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 29 (02) : 150 - 164
  • [25] Evaluation of five different aneurysm scoring systems to predict mortality in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients
    Vos, Cornelis G.
    de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    Werson, Debora A. B.
    van Dongen, Eric P. A.
    Schreve, Michiel A.
    Unlu, Cagdas
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 64 (06) : 1609 - 1616
  • [26] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians: clinical outcomes and complications
    Raju, Sneha
    Eisenberg, Naomi
    Montbriand, Janice
    Roche-Nagle, Graham
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 63 (04) : E329 - E337
  • [27] Risk diagnosis based on diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Jeong, Jin-Hyoung
    Kim, Jun-Tae
    Kim, Nam-Sun
    Cho, Jae-Hyun
    Kim, Ju-Hee
    Oh, Ji-Ye
    Jang, Jee-Hun
    Lee, Sang-Sik
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2016, 24 : S569 - S575
  • [28] The Glasgow Aneurysm Score does not predict mortality after open abdominal aortic aneurysm in the era of endovascular aneurysm repair
    Patterson, Benjamin Oliver
    Karthikesalingam, Alan
    Hinchliffe, Robert J.
    Loftus, Ian M.
    Thompson, Matt M.
    Holt, Peter J. E.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (02) : 353 - 357
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair based on aneurysm size
    Young, Kate C.
    Awad, Nadia A.
    Johansson, Marcia
    Gillespie, David
    Singh, Michael J.
    Illig, Karl A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [30] The Importance of Patient-Specific Regionally Varying Wall Thickness in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Biomechanics
    Raut, Samarth S.
    Jana, Anirban
    De Oliveira, Victor
    Muluk, Satish C.
    Finol, Ender A.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2013, 135 (08):