Clinical activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab, and TMZ in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

被引:3
作者
Lu, Yinghao [1 ]
Liao, Limin [1 ]
Du, Kunpeng [1 ]
Mo, Jianhua [2 ]
Zou, Xia [2 ]
Liang, Junxian [3 ]
Chen, Jiahui [1 ]
Tang, Wenwen [1 ]
Su, Liwei [1 ]
Wu, Jieping [1 ]
Zhang, Junde [1 ]
Tan, Yujing [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 253 Gongye Rd, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Image, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Dept Surg, Guangzhou 510280, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Recurrent glioblastoma; Immunotherapy; Sintilimab; Treatment outcomes; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; PHASE-II TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; TEMOZOLOMIDE; PLUS; COMBINATION; EXPRESSION; GRADE; IRINOTECAN; SORAFENIB;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-11848-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThere are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m(2)orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria.ResultsThe mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217-4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0-55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred.ConclusionIn this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Vascular endothelial growth factor expression correlates with tumour grade and vascularity in gliomas
    Chaudhry, IH
    O'Donovan, DG
    Brenchley, PEC
    Reid, H
    Roberts, ISD
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2001, 39 (04) : 409 - 415
  • [2] Is surgery at progression a prognostic marker for improved 6-month progression-free survival or overall survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma?
    Clarke, Jennifer L.
    Ennis, Michele M.
    Yung, W. K. Alfred
    Chang, Susan M.
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Cloughesy, Timothy F.
    DeAngelis, Lisa M.
    Robins, H. Ian
    Lieberman, Frank S.
    Fine, Howard A.
    Abrey, Lauren
    Gilbert, Mark R.
    Mehta, Minesh
    Kuhn, John G.
    Aldape, Kenneth D.
    Lamborn, Kathleen R.
    Prados, Michael D.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 (10) : 1118 - 1124
  • [3] Bevacizumab and daily temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma
    Desjardins, Annick
    Reardon, David A.
    Coan, April
    Marcello, Jennifer
    Herndon, James E., II
    Bailey, Leighann
    Peters, Katherine B.
    Friedman, Henry S.
    Vredenburgh, James J.
    [J]. CANCER, 2012, 118 (05) : 1302 - 1312
  • [4] Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination with Sorafenib in Recurrent Glioblastoma (N0776): A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial
    Galanis, Evanthia
    Anderson, S. Keith
    Lafky, Jackie M.
    Uhm, Joon H.
    Giannini, Caterina
    Kumar, Shaji K.
    Kimlinger, Teresa K.
    Northfelt, Donald W.
    Flynn, Patrick J.
    Jaeckle, Kurt A.
    Kaufmann, Timothy J.
    Buckner, Jan C.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 19 (17) : 4816 - 4823
  • [5] NRG oncology RTOG 0625: a randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab with either irinotecan or dose-dense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma
    Gilbert, Mark R.
    Pugh, Stephanie L.
    Aldape, Ken
    Sorensen, A. Gregory
    Mikkelsen, Tom
    Penas-Prado, Marta
    Bokstein, Felix
    Kwok, Young
    Lee, R. Jeffrey
    Mehta, Minesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 131 (01) : 193 - 199
  • [6] Combination of Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: Results From a Prospective Study
    Jiang, Haihui
    Yu, Kefu
    Cui, Yong
    Ren, Xiaohui
    Li, Mingxiao
    Yang, Chuanwei
    Zhao, Xuzhe
    Zhu, Qinghui
    Lin, Song
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [7] Temozolomide for immunomodulation in the treatment of glioblastoma
    Karachi, Aida
    Dastmalchi, Farhad
    Mitchell, Duane A.
    Rahman, Maryam
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 (12) : 1566 - 1572
  • [8] Phase II Trial of Single-Agent Bevacizumab Followed by Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan at Tumor Progression in Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Kreisl, Teri N.
    Kim, Lyndon
    Moore, Kraig
    Duic, Paul
    Royce, Cheryl
    Stroud, Irene
    Garren, Nancy
    Mackey, Megan
    Butman, John A.
    Camphausen, Kevin
    Park, John
    Albert, Paul S.
    Fine, Howard A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (05) : 740 - 745
  • [9] Progression-free survival: An important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas
    Lamborn, Kathleen R.
    Yung, W. K. Alfred
    Chang, Susan M.
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Cloughesy, Timothy F.
    DeAngelis, Lisa M.
    Robins, H. Ian
    Lieberman, Frank S.
    Fine, Howard A.
    Fink, Karen L.
    Junck, Larry
    Abrey, Lauren
    Gilbert, Mark R.
    Mehta, Minesh
    Kuhn, John G.
    Aldape, Kenneth D.
    Hibberts, Janelle
    Peterson, Pamela M.
    Prados, Michael D.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 10 (02) : 162 - 170
  • [10] Lassen U, 2013, ANTICANCER RES, V33, P1657