The effect of 3D-printed bone tissue scaffolds geometrical designs on bacterial biofilm formation

被引:1
|
作者
Al-Tamimi, Abdulsalam A. [1 ]
Aldawood, Esraa [2 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Ind Engn Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Dept Clin Labs Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
3D printing; Auxetic; Bacterial biofilm; Bone scaffold; Geometrical design; Triply periodic minimal surface; PORE-SIZE; BIOMATERIALS; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.36922/ijb.1768
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Bone fractures are recognized as a global health problem. A common strategy to tackle this issue is to employ a tissue engineering scaffold to accelerate tissue healing. However, one of the main challenges that can result in delaying the recovery is the risk of bacterial infections. This study aims to assess the impact of the geometry and the porosity of tissue scaffolds on the Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Three triply periodic minimal surface designs of Schwarz primitive (SP), gyroid (GY), and Schwarz diamond (SD) and re-entrant auxetic (RE) design were examined and compared to a reference design (RD) considering two different porosity levels of 75% and 45%. The amount of biofilm was quantified using crystal violet assay and was visualized using scanning electron microscopy. The SP scaffold, with low porosity, exhibited a significantly less amount of bacterial biofilm formation and was regarded as having the best design among the others, while the SD with low porosity showed the greatest amount of biofilm. The morphological analysis was also in line with the crystal violet assay results. On the other hand, the surface roughness was affected by the complexity, geometrical variations, and limitations of fused filament fabrication three-dimensional printing. For the RD, SP, GY, and SD designs, an increase in surface roughness was demonstrated to increase the production of bacterial biofilms. Without statistical significance, the RE design showed the opposite trend. Contrary to other designs, the increase in pore size of the SP and GY designs was associated with the development of bacterial biofilms. This study suggests that it is possible to minimize the likelihood of bacterial biofilm formation by optimizing the scaffold geometry and its manufacturing.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 338
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chitosan-based 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Yadav, L. Roshini
    Chandran, S. Viji
    Lavanya, K.
    Selvamurugan, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2021, 183 : 1925 - 1938
  • [2] Evaluating the effect of pore size for 3d-printed bone scaffolds
    Seehanam, Saran
    Khrueaduangkham, Suppakrit
    Sinthuvanich, Chomdao
    Sae-Ueng, Udom
    Srimaneepong, Viritpon
    Promoppatum, Patcharapit
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [3] Hierarchically porous 3D-printed ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Chan, Shareen S. L.
    Black, Jay R.
    Franks, George, V
    Heath, Daniel E.
    BIOMATERIALS ADVANCES, 2025, 169
  • [4] Evaluating 3D-Printed Biomaterials as Scaffolds for Vascularized Bone Tissue Engineering
    Wang, Martha O.
    Vorwald, Charlotte E.
    Dreher, Maureen L.
    Mott, Eric J.
    Cheng, Ming-Huei
    Cinar, Ali
    Mehdizadeh, Hamidreza
    Somo, Sami
    Dean, David
    Brey, Eric M.
    Fisher, John P.
    ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2015, 27 (01) : 138 - 144
  • [5] 3D-printed injectable nanocomposite cryogel scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration
    Castanheira, Edgar J.
    Maia, Joao R.
    Monteiro, Luis P. G.
    Sobreiro-Almeida, Rita
    Wittig, Nina K.
    Birkedal, Henrik
    Rodrigues, Joao M. M.
    Mano, Joao F.
    MATERIALS TODAY NANO, 2024, 28
  • [6] Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials
    Hall, Donald C. Jr Jr
    Palmer, Phillip
    Ji, Hai-Feng
    Ehrlich, Garth D.
    Krol, Jaroslaw E.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [7] Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds
    Marjan Bahraminasab
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 19
  • [8] Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds
    Bahraminasab, Marjan
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [9] Bacterial Cellulose: A Sustainable Source for Hydrogels and 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
    Utoiu, Elena
    Manoiu, Vasile Sorin
    Oprita, Elena Iulia
    Craciunescu, Oana
    GELS, 2024, 10 (06)
  • [10] Multifunctional 3D-Printed Magnetic Polycaprolactone/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Petretta, Mauro
    Gambardella, Alessandro
    Desando, Giovanna
    Cavallo, Carola
    Bartolotti, Isabella
    Shelyakova, Tatiana
    Goranov, Vitaly
    Brucale, Marco
    Dediu, Valentin Alek
    Fini, Milena
    Grigolo, Brunella
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (21)